Aller au contenu

Photo

Are the Geth Justifed


  • Ce sujet est fermé Ce sujet est fermé
368 réponses à ce sujet

#51
Dean_the_Young

Dean_the_Young
  • Members
  • 20 676 messages

DPSSOC wrote...

adam_grif wrote...


In the fight for survival, there are no rules.


Right, so when the Geth had won the fight to survival and could go wherever they wanted and had the Quarians military well and truly defeated, and they decided to just keep fighting them instead of negotiating a peace, that was... what exactly?


I believe I said it earlier but it bears repeating.  When your enemy desires nothing but your extinction the fight for survival doesn't end when they're beaten it ends when they're destroyed.

The people who wanted to kill the Geth were not every single man, woman, child, infirm, and/or dissidents who disagreed with the Quarian government. The people who wanted to kill the Geth were the government and officials pursing the policy.


And while it's true the Geth made no attempts at brokering peace did the Quarians?  Neither side was willing to sit down and settle for peace and we can't even be sure the Geth intelligence was sophisticated enough to grasp the concept.  Another problem is we don't have any good info on the War.  Maybe the Geth did offer terms of surrender/peace and the Quarians just didn't accept them or vice-versa.

The Quarians may or may not, but the Geth didn't give them a chance either. The Geth didn't give anyone a chance to so much establish relations: the Geth have uniformly killed all emissionaries and contact attempts from any source.

#52
Schneidend

Schneidend
  • Members
  • 5 768 messages

Dean_the_Young wrote...
The fact that it requires an extensive amount of time makes it require sustained orbital dominance to not be disarmed.

Fearing death has nothing to do with it.


It doesn't take orbital dominance to defend a target from attack. You don't have to have beaten the quarian fleet to drop a colony or asteroid, you just have to keep them from effectively entering into melee range.

Regardless, these sorts of attacks did occur, and were used by both sides. Legion states as much. It's canonical.

Modifié par Schneidend, 03 février 2011 - 06:01 .


#53
Moiaussi

Moiaussi
  • Members
  • 2 890 messages

Dean_the_Young wrote...

The Quarians may or may not, but the Geth didn't give them a chance either. The Geth didn't give anyone a chance to so much establish relations: the Geth have uniformly killed all emissionaries and contact attempts from any source.


We were told that, yes. We were also told that no ships going past the veil came back. However in ME2 we learn that the Quarians do so routinely, and when TIM sends the Normandy into the veil after Tali, noone even mentions the the border at all... it is treated like a non-event.

#54
Dean_the_Young

Dean_the_Young
  • Members
  • 20 676 messages

Schneidend wrote...

Dean_the_Young wrote...
The fact that it requires an extensive amount of time makes it require sustained orbital dominance to not be disarmed.

Fearing death has nothing to do with it.


It doesn't take orbital dominance to defend a target from attack. You don't have to have beaten the quarian fleet to drop a colony or asteroid, you just have to keep them from effectively entering into melee range.

Since they don't need to enter melee range, you pretty much do have to be able to beat back the Quarian fleet.

All the Quarians have to do is shoot the motors. Which, from range and in terms of orbital trajectories, is pretty easy.

Regardless, these sorts of attacks did occur, and were used by both sides. Legion states as much. It's canonical.

Legion says WMD's, and makes no assertion of planetary-altering colony/asteroid drops akin to BDtS. So no, such an assertion is not cannonical.

#55
DarthSliver

DarthSliver
  • Members
  • 3 335 messages

hawat333 wrote...

DarthSliver wrote...

Quarians had a chance to keep peace with the Geth, instead they choose to attack the Geth and shut them down. The Quarians in a way end up building their own Skynet without realizing it, just this Skynet only attacked after be provoked.



I quote hawat333 of what he quoted of me saying 11 hours ago. Reading my quote, its clear that the Quarians had brought this about themselves. They are responsible for the Geth getting intelligence enough to gasp the meaning of life. The Quarians didnt create a failsafe for their Machines and allowed them to become sentient beings. Also watch Bicentennial Man to refer to what the Quarians allowed. Its a movie that essentially explains a Machine gaining sentient status and than it going on and understanding the meaning of life.  Also it evolved and eventually knew what being human actually meant. 
So all in all the Quarians allowed the Geths programming to evolve enough and brought this upon themselves. From my understanding they didnt have a failsafe mechanism like they shouldve to easily shut their machines down. Geth programming evolved and brought them into sentient status because the Quarians allowed it

#56
Dean_the_Young

Dean_the_Young
  • Members
  • 20 676 messages

Moiaussi wrote...

Dean_the_Young wrote...

The Quarians may or may not, but the Geth didn't give them a chance either. The Geth didn't give anyone a chance to so much establish relations: the Geth have uniformly killed all emissionaries and contact attempts from any source.


We were told that, yes. We were also told that no ships going past the veil came back. However in ME2 we learn that the Quarians do so routinely, and when TIM sends the Normandy into the veil after Tali, noone even mentions the the border at all... it is treated like a non-event.

Moiaussi, limited incursions by the Quarians, who aren't part of the public/intelligence community of the Citadel members who make the claims (Anderson, for example), and changing circumstances after the Geth broke isolation and invaded the Alliance, are a completely different magnitudes and scale to diplomatic relations with the Geth.

Now, if you intend to make a position that just because they say they haven't made contact, and no evidence to suggest the Geth have ever received diplomatic contact has ever been presented in the game, and the geth never refer to any sort of diplomatic contact, it remains a good position that the Geth really have been receptive to diplomatic entreties and such has occured... well, then I'll be looking at you like you're taking a silly position in light of our current facts.

#57
Schneidend

Schneidend
  • Members
  • 5 768 messages

Dean_the_Young wrote...

Since they don't need to enter melee range, you pretty much do have to be able to beat back the Quarian fleet.

All the Quarians have to do is shoot the motors. Which, from range and in terms of orbital trajectories, is pretty easy.


And that's where the geth lack of fear comes into play. They can intercept slugs with their own ships.

Also, they can harry the quarians' artillery ships to prevent them from being able to fire accurate shots on the asteroid's acceleration rig.

Legion says WMD's, and makes no assertion of planetary-altering colony/asteroid drops akin to BDtS. So no, such an assertion is not cannonical.


In the Mass Effect universe colony drops and asteroid drops are lumped into the WMDs, because they are just as accessible.

The Citadel conventions banned colony drops and asteroid drops after the Krogan Rebellions and the codex entry detailing this refers to them as WMDs.

Regardless, my point was that both sides were brutally slaughtering each other, and that Legion didn't condone either side doing so. All WMDs are brutal and indiscriminate.

#58
Dean_the_Young

Dean_the_Young
  • Members
  • 20 676 messages

Schneidend wrote...

Dean_the_Young wrote...

Since they don't need to enter melee range, you pretty much do have to be able to beat back the Quarian fleet.

All the Quarians have to do is shoot the motors. Which, from range and in terms of orbital trajectories, is pretty easy.


And that's where the geth lack of fear comes into play. They can intercept slugs with their own ships.

They do that, they run out of ships. And meat shields.

Also, they can harry the quarians' artillery ships to prevent them from being able to fire accurate shots on the asteroid's acceleration rig.

Not really: it doesn't take a long time to calculate or aim by trajectories. To be able to harry a ship at such a point would require space dominance.

In the Mass Effect universe colony drops and asteroid drops are lumped into the WMDs, because they are just as accessible.

But they aren't the WMD's alluded to.

The Citadel conventions banned colony drops and asteroid drops after the Krogan Rebellions and the codex entry detailing this refers to them as WMDs.

And nothing in the Geth war implies colony drops.

Regardless, my point was that both sides were brutally slaughtering each other, and that Legion didn't condone either side doing so. All WMDs are brutal and indiscriminate.

Some are very, very discriminate.

#59
Pro_Consul

Pro_Consul
  • Members
  • 481 messages

adam_grif wrote...

 Yeah, the Quarians misunderstood the nature of the Geth as well as their motivations, but the geth made no attempt to be understood. It's not sufficient for them to just throw their hands up and shout "they started it!" At no point did they attempt diplomacy, and in the hundreds of years since the Geth uprisings not only have they made no attempt at diplomacy, they have also destroyed anybody who attempted to contact them, just for committing the crime of entering Geth territory.

The Quarians understood the Geth as a dangerous threat that needed to be destroyed at any cost because that's how the Geth were behaving, and the Geth made no attempts to indicate that they were anything but. This is why it's difficult to blame the Quarians retrospectively - they were rational beings acting on the information they had. It's funny that in the video someone linked above, the Geth say that the Quarians have to meet them halfway for peace, because the Geth refuse to even try.


Basically your logic reads like this: I have given birth to a new person. That person has not taken any steps to assure me that he won't someday grow up to be hostile to me. Ergo I should immediately kill him. I might expect that kind of thinking from a machine, but you are attributing it to the Quarians.


You are trying to blame the victim for the actions of the aggressor. The Geth didn't one day wake to sentience, start killing Quarians, and then the Quarians decided to exterminate them. The Geth woke to sentience; and the moment they realized they were no longer dealing with simple machines but with a sentient species, the Quarians decided that the "safest" course was to exterminate that new species because it MIGHT turn out to be hostile and probably wouldn't want to be a slave race. It was only after the Quarians began their campaign of extermination that the Geth fought back and drove them from the homeworld. And once the Quarians were "driven from the field" the Geth established their lines and stayed behind them. (Until the Reapers came along and messed with their heads, that is.)

LookingGlass93 wrote...

The geth were justified in fighting back, but they went too far (unless it turn out the quarians wiped out their own populations through nukes or something).


Huh?! When someone is trying to exterminate your entire species what difference does it make if they use WMDs or just shoot each and every last person in the head with a pistol. Extermination is, by itself, going way too far. And the Quarians were the ones trying to exterminate the Geth without provocation, so they have no right to complain and the Geth were completely justified in defending themselves by whatever means were available. The only way in which the Geth would cease to be justified is if the Quarians either decide they don't want to enslave and/or exterminate them, or the Quarians cease to exist.

shatteredstar56 wrote...

The geth are justified in fighting for their freedom, however I don't think they are justified in keeping the quarian homeworld. I think they're keeping it because it would give a huge advantage the quarians, and they can keep  them at bay otherwise. The geth don't need to live in any one environment, they are machines and can live  wherever they want.



It ceased to be exclusively the Quarians' homeworld the moment the Quarians created another sentient species  there. At that point it became jointly the Quarians' and the Geth's homeworld. And then the moment the Quarians decided to exterminate their cohabitants they sacrificed any claim to it. After all, if a married couple jointly owns a  house and then one of them tries to kill the other, they have no right to complain if they get driven out and not  allowed back in. In fact, they should be thankful not to be killed in the attempt.


shatteredstar56 wrote...

I feel bad that they're controlled by the reapers, to an extent, but they did follow that road and become that way. If  the geth are to be treated as a race, in some point at the future, then they should be heldaccountable for all actions.


Perhaps, but by that logic the Alliance should also be held accountable for all the atrocities committed by Cerberus.

Modifié par Pro_Consul, 03 février 2011 - 09:41 .


#60
Schneidend

Schneidend
  • Members
  • 5 768 messages

Dean_the_Young wrote...

But they aren't the WMD's alluded to.


I don't believe any specifics are mentioned. I assumed colony drops and asteroids, and you did not. Either way, its massive destruction and brutality, and Legion doesn't think the geth should have done it any more than he thinks the quarians should have.

And nothing in the Geth war implies colony drops.

Nothing in the Morning War implies that they were not colony drops.

Some are very, very discriminate.


That would actually work on the geth? An EMP blast is the only thing I could imagine, since they can't be hacked long-term or in large numbers.

#61
EternalPink

EternalPink
  • Members
  • 472 messages
As i recall from the codex the citadel conventions only prohibit WMD/asteroid drops on garden worlds since they take about 5 million years to come about.



If you enemy is on anything but a garden world, those rules don't apply.



I've always assumed thats how the turians managed to drop rocks on the human colony (shanxi was it? ) that you are told about in dialogue from ashley in ME1

#62
adam_grif

adam_grif
  • Members
  • 1 923 messages

Basically your logic reads like this: I have given birth to a new person. That person has not taken any steps to assure me that he won't someday grow up to be hostile to me. Ergo I should immediately kill him. I might expect that kind of thinking from a machine, but you are attributing it to the Quarians.


No, it's like finding out your girlfriend is pregnant, trying to get an abortion, but then when you head into the surgery it turns out she's already given birth, the child is twenty five years old and is waving a shotgun in your face and starts trying to kill you because wanted to destroy it. Your analogy is bad because it implies that the Geth couldn't understand things, when prior to their rebellion they had an understanding of the metaphysical concept of the soul and were asking serious philosophical questions. They were built for performing labor and clearly did not possess the intelligence of a new born baby.

The Quarians had no idea the geth neural networks were so advanced, and were shutting them down at the first sign that they were in danger of becoming sentient and possibly rebelling. They were doing what they thought was preempting that from happening, only it turns out they were already fully developed in those regards and prevented a shutdown with force.


You are trying to blame the victim for the actions of the aggressor. The Geth didn't one day wake to sentience, start killing Quarians, and then the Quarians decided to exterminate them.


Your "BUT THEY STARTED IT" mentality is juvenile, even if the Quarians were moustache twirling supervillains and tortured puppies in their spare time and knew the Geth were sentient and tried to kill them just to be evil, there is still no excuse for the Geth not attempting to negotiate peace or even let the Quarians know that they were open to peaceful coexistence. Hey, the Germans started World War II, so I guess that makes it okay for the Allies to hunt down and kill every german, right? Down to the last man, woman and child? Even the ones who aren't old enough to know what is happening, or were uninvolved, or were actually trying to stop the war? Because that is what we are talking about. Complete extermination of civilian population except for the ones who fled before the Geth had the means to destroy them.

Modifié par adam_grif, 04 février 2011 - 12:21 .


#63
EternalPink

EternalPink
  • Members
  • 472 messages

adam_grif wrote...

Your "BUT THEY STARTED IT" mentality is juvenile, even if the Quarians were moustache twirling supervillains and tortured puppies in their spare time and knew the Geth were sentient and tried to kill them just to be evil, there is still no excuse for the Geth not attempting to negotiate peace or even let the Quarians know that they were open to peaceful coexistence.


And if the thing in question happens to have a juvenile mentality since they have only just become self aware surely excuses the geth for not attempting to negotiate (the realisation that others are indiviuals with wants and needs themselves is an abstract we don't expect from recently self aware humans)

#64
adam_grif

adam_grif
  • Members
  • 1 923 messages

And if the thing in question happens to have a juvenile mentality since they have only just become self aware surely excuses the geth for not attempting to negotiate (the realisation that others are indiviuals with wants and needs themselves is an abstract we don't expect from recently self aware humans)




That excuse isn't going to cut it, because Geth aren't human infants. They are and were highly intelligent, more intelligent than any single human could hope to be when they are networked on the scales that they are and were. They don't get born, raised and slowly nurtured over a 20 year period into their adulthood, they're built with the knowledge and experience inside them and they share all of it with every other Geth in the network. They are a superintelligence.



They don't have emotions so they don't have to learn to master them. The only thing they have is cold hard facts and calculations. They determined that wiping the Quarians out was the best course of action for whatever reason, and did not care about the moral implications. They have continued to display this behaviour long, long after the morning war. If we accept your ballocks about being babies who didn't understand, why haven't they attempted to do anything to right their wrongs in the hundreds of years since then? Why have the so called "true geth", not heretics, killed any and all envoys that came into their territory?



The only conclusion we can arrive at is that they simple don't care. They never cared, and they never will care. They are acting out of pure self interest, and their quarian Genocide was not "morally justified".

#65
Schneidend

Schneidend
  • Members
  • 5 768 messages
Their supposed infantile nature may be why the killing went so far.

Once they achieved consensus that they should do as much damage as possible to the quarian population, they may have been unable to achieve consensus to stop until after the quarians fled and were no longer a threat. If the inability to act without consensus is a limitation of their software, then are they not blameless for the way their creators made them?

An interesting thought to ponder, speculative though it may be.

adam_grif wrote...

The only conclusion we can arrive at is
that they simple don't care. They never cared, and they never will
care. They are acting out of pure self interest, and their quarian
Genocide was not "morally justified".


It may be more accurate to say that they lack the ability to "care" entirely.

Modifié par Schneidend, 04 février 2011 - 01:13 .


#66
EternalPink

EternalPink
  • Members
  • 472 messages
when legion played there first recorded entry for me, they didn't sound so super intelligent and that they were asking whether they had a soul also doesnt sound super intelligent.



were told multiple times they are stupid in small numbers/on there own and that it takes 10 to 50 of them to have the brains to plan how to take over a ship and execute it and this is after they've been self optimising/evolving for 300 years.



so back when the war started 300 years ago why would they be super intelligent? what are you basing that on?

#67
Jamin101

Jamin101
  • Members
  • 242 messages
Im with eternalpink on this one no offence to adam. The audio legion played sounded like a 6 year old asking about life.



So we have a group of children in adult bodies who start evolving intelligence and are immediately determined dangerous and genocide is the only option. These child like creatures are twice the soldiers the quarians are and pwn them in the war.



Like another poster said maybe they couldnt reach consensus until their homeworld was secure, I say its theirs like that other poster said quarians lost the right when they lost the war. The geth then never leave their territory and only attack if their empire is penetrated. People say this is bad but if the alliance saw a rachni or geth ship it would instantly be shot down.



Another poster keeps saying why didnt they try to make peace. Besides the fact the quarians never did Legion addresses this (paraphrased): "every time creators thought they had a chance at victory/an advantage they attacked 100% of the time"



I dont even see how one could argue it is not the quarians who take the blame. Its not like terminator where they discover skynet is intelligent at 2am, try to shut it down and by 2:15am the nukes are launched. This was a bloody war of extermination against a sentient species that lasted a long time. The quarians should be thankfull the geth stay in the veil or havent sent an attack force against the migrant fleet

#68
Pro_Consul

Pro_Consul
  • Members
  • 481 messages

adam_grif wrote...

No, it's like finding out your girlfriend is pregnant, trying to get an abortion, but then when you head into the surgery it turns out she's already given birth, the child is twenty five years old and is waving a shotgun in your face and starts trying to kill you because wanted to destroy it. Your analogy is bad because it implies that the Geth couldn't understand things, when prior to their rebellion they had an understanding of the metaphysical concept of the soul and were asking serious philosophical questions. They were built for performing labor and clearly did not possess the intelligence of a new born baby.

The Quarians had no idea the geth neural networks were so advanced, and were shutting them down at the first sign that they were in danger of becoming sentient and possibly rebelling. They were doing what they thought was preempting that from happening, only it turns out they were already fully developed in those regards and prevented a shutdown with force.


Where are you getting this from? First off, it was the Quarians who first tried to wipe out the Geth as soon as they realized the Geth were sentient. Second, the Geth were never "waving a shotgun" in the Quarians' face, metaphorically of course. They went from being a newly nascent consciousness straight to being the target of a genocide campaign in one fell swoop, without ever doing anything more threatening than beginning to think for themselves.



You are trying to blame the victim for the actions of the aggressor. The Geth didn't one day wake to sentience, start killing Quarians, and then the Quarians decided to exterminate them.


Your "BUT THEY STARTED IT" mentality is juvenile, even if the Quarians were moustache twirling supervillains and tortured puppies in their spare time and knew the Geth were sentient and tried to kill them just to be evil, there is still no excuse for the Geth not attempting to negotiate peace or even let the Quarians know that they were open to peaceful coexistence.


With all polite respectfulness, baloney! When someone launches an unprovoked surprise invasion of your country and starts systematically killing every single person they find, are you going to lobby your government to open diplomatic negotiations with them to find a peaceful solution? Heck no! You're going to demand immediate mobilization of your country's entire military to launch an all-out attack on this vicious, rampaging genocidal enemy. And if you aren't in the military yourself you're gonna make sure to get the best weapon you can so that you can kill every single one of these genocidal maniacs who dares to come anywhere near you or your family.

You are apparently thinking my argument is simply "they started it". But it isn't. My point is that the Geth were ALREADY peacefully coexisting with their Quarian creators when those creators suddenly turned on them and tried to wipe them all out. What other reaction beyond fighting back would make any sense in the face of such sudden, brutal and unprovoked murderous actions? You can negotiate with a mugger, perhaps, but trying to negotiate with someone who has already killed a good portion of your family and is currently blazing away with his weapon trying to kill you is just plain suicidal.

#69
Jedi Master of Orion

Jedi Master of Orion
  • Members
  • 6 911 messages
That still doesn't make wiping them out yourself any more right or justifiable.

#70
Guest_Juromaro_*

Guest_Juromaro_*
  • Guests

adam_grif wrote...

Schneidend wrote...

adam_grif wrote...
No.

Well that was easy. Systmatically exterminating the Quarian people, and only failing because their last remaining survivors fled is what we would consider a war crime.


Both sides went to excessive and brutal extremes to try and take each other out completely.


Genocide is not acceptable just because the other side wanted to do it to you first. The geth should have defeated the Quarian miliatary then fled. At worst, you could justify the occupation of the Quarian civilian population and maybe even forcibly relocating them (maybe). You can't justify total obliteration.



As garrus put it, an eye for an eye, a life for a life. If my people were created by someone and the moment we asked why we are, and they tried to slaughter all of us then yes Genocide is justified. It would take thousands of years to convince the entire Quarian population that the geth are not the enemy and they can live together in relative peace. It's kinda like trying to convince an atheist there is a god and vice versa.

#71
Pro_Consul

Pro_Consul
  • Members
  • 481 messages

Jedi Master of Orion wrote...

That still doesn't make wiping them out yourself any more right or justifiable.


Still, if you don't wanna get wiped out, don't go around launching unprovoked wars of genocide. If you do launch such an atrocious pogrom, don't complain if you barely survive afterward...instead be thankful. And if your race is 99.99% wiped because of having tried to launch an unprovoked genocidal war, then what in the blue blazes are you doing preparing to launch ANOTHER one!?!

Honestly, the Quarians even thinking of trying again to enslave or wipe out the Geth sounds to me a lot like they are TRYING to select themselves for extinction.

#72
Jedi Master of Orion

Jedi Master of Orion
  • Members
  • 6 911 messages

Juromaro wrote...

As garrus put it, an eye for an eye, a life
for a life. If my people were created by someone and the moment we asked
why we are, and they tried to slaughter all of us then yes Genocide is
justified. It would take thousands of years to convince the entire
Quarian population that the geth are not the enemy and they can live
together in relative peace. It's kinda like trying to convince an
atheist there is a god and vice versa.


No it isn't. Billions of men women and children were guilty of nothing. Murdering them does not avenge the death of anybody else. They are innocent. By that logic then all germans, turks, rawandan hutus and every other people who were involved in genocide in the past deserved to be exterminated.

Pro_Consul wrote...

Jedi Master of Orion wrote...

That still doesn't make wiping them out yourself any more right or justifiable.


Still,
if you don't wanna get wiped out, don't go around launching unprovoked
wars of genocide. If you do launch such an atrocious pogrom, don't
complain if you barely survive afterward...instead be thankful. And if
your race is 99.99% wiped because of having tried to launch an
unprovoked genocidal war, then what in the blue blazes are you doing
preparing to launch ANOTHER one!?!

Honestly, the Quarians even
thinking of trying again to enslave or wipe out the Geth sounds to me a
lot like they are TRYING to select themselves for extinction.


You keep talking as if innocent quarians (the ones who's only crime was being quarian) have no right to be unhappy at being murdered and that the geth don't bear any responsibility for their own decisions.

Modifié par Jedi Master of Orion, 04 février 2011 - 02:59 .


#73
Pro_Consul

Pro_Consul
  • Members
  • 481 messages

Jedi Master of Orion wrote...

You keep talking as if innocent quarians (the ones who's only crime was being quarian) have no right to be unhappy at being murdered and that the geth don't bear any responsibility for their own decisions.


Actually, being murdered, they have no right to be unhappy at anything...that is a right reserved for the living. ;-)

Seriously, though, these innocent Quarians of whom you speak should not hate the Geth for what happened to their race. They should instead learn not to choose leaders who will launch genocidal pogroms on their behalf and start wars they have no hope of winning. Seriously, we need to stay in tune with the real world just a little here. If you walk up to some stranger, and then for no justifiable reason whatsoever you pull out a weapon and try to kill him, what right do you have to expect mercy from him? Where would you derive any right to complain if he, having the option to merely scare you, chose to shoot you dead. After all, you were really trying to kill him...

The same applies at the macro level. If your nation launches an unprovoked war to try to annihilate some neighbor that has never done anything to threaten you, just how much right do you have to heap curses on them if they should decide to nuke your country into oblivion to end the matter. Bottom line, when the defenders are fighting for their very existence from an unprovoked attack meant to completely annihilate them, then there is no room for the attackers to blame anyone but themselves for any excesses that occur in the ensuing struggle. I mean just look at the hypocrisy: a Quarian whose people launched an unprovoked war of genocide complaining that the defender went too far in fighting back against imposed extinction?! That is whack!

#74
Kasces

Kasces
  • Members
  • 138 messages

Pro_Consul wrote...

Jedi Master of Orion wrote...

You keep talking as if innocent quarians (the ones who's only crime was being quarian) have no right to be unhappy at being murdered and that the geth don't bear any responsibility for their own decisions.


Actually, being murdered, they have no right to be unhappy at anything...that is a right reserved for the living. ;-)

Seriously, though, these innocent Quarians of whom you speak should not hate the Geth for what happened to their race. They should instead learn not to choose leaders who will launch genocidal pogroms on their behalf and start wars they have no hope of winning. Seriously, we need to stay in tune with the real world just a little here. If you walk up to some stranger, and then for no justifiable reason whatsoever you pull out a weapon and try to kill him, what right do you have to expect mercy from him? Where would you derive any right to complain if he, having the option to merely scare you, chose to shoot you dead. After all, you were really trying to kill him...

The same applies at the macro level. If your nation launches an unprovoked war to try to annihilate some neighbor that has never done anything to threaten you, just how much right do you have to heap curses on them if they should decide to nuke your country into oblivion to end the matter. Bottom line, when the defenders are fighting for their very existence from an unprovoked attack meant to completely annihilate them, then there is no room for the attackers to blame anyone but themselves for any excesses that occur in the ensuing struggle. I mean just look at the hypocrisy: a Quarian whose people launched an unprovoked war of genocide complaining that the defender went too far in fighting back against imposed extinction?! That is whack!


This. People seem to really be downplaying the Quarian's genocidal attitude. To logical machines with the sapience of a 5 year old, what else were they suppose to do? They kicked ass and the Quarians have no one to blame but themselves.

#75
adam_grif

adam_grif
  • Members
  • 1 923 messages
[quote]And if the thing in question happens to have a juvenile mentality
since they have only just become self aware surely excuses the geth for
not attempting to negotiate (the realisation that others are indiviuals
with wants and needs themselves is an abstract we don't expect from
recently self aware humans)[/quote]

Except they obviosuly do have an extremely well developed theory of mind,  since they understand that Quarians have motivations other than their own. The ability to realize that other people have viewpoints dissimilar to your own and that other people have different knowledge, desires etc is an important milestone in developmental psychology, but one that the Geth had already long since passed.

And I'm going to say it again, you can't just compare Geth to babies based on "what they sound like", because they do NOT undergo human cognitive development. They are wholly different beasts. Things like "but they had only just developed sentience" mean nothing because there isn't some ladder of mental development that sentient species climb, where they must have been sentient for X number of years before they understand concept Y.


[quote]Once they achieved consensus that they should do as much damage as
possible to the quarian population, they may have been unable to achieve
consensus to stop until after
the quarians fled and were no longer a threat. If the inability to act
without consensus is a limitation of their software, then are they not
blameless for the way their creators made them?

An interesting
thought to ponder, speculative though it may be.[/quote]

This implies highly innacurate evaluations on the part of the geth, the generalization that all Quarians are hostile by nature, that Quarians cannot be negotiated with, and that because of these things the Quarian civilian population must be destroyed in addition to all of their military assets, as opposed to occupation or even just Geth retreat to some far away place.


[quote]

were told multiple times they are stupid in small numbers/on
there own and that it takes 10 to 50 of them to have the brains to plan
how to take over a ship and execute it and this is after they've been
self optimising/evolving for 300 years.



so back when the
war started 300 years ago why would they be super intelligent? what are
you basing that on?[/quote]

They form local hive minds, a planet full of Geth were obviously intelligent enough to overthrow their Quarian masters, form military units, plan and win a war against a starfaring civilization. I would say this requires a large deal of intelligence, wouldn't you?


[quote]So we have a group of children in adult bodies who start evolving
intelligence and are immediately determined dangerous and genocide is
the only option. These child like creatures are twice the soldiers the
quarians are and pwn them in the war.[/quote]

They aren't children, they're robots. They performed actions and displayed intelligence that can never be mistaken for that of a child, but because one robot once asked a Quarian whether it had a soul or not you're stating that every Geth is a child, and that collctively, millions of networked Geth all acting in unison are also like children? This is not an acceptable generalization to make, especially since you're basing it solely on intuition ("Well that one sounded like a child").


[quote]Like another poster said maybe they couldnt reach consensus
until their homeworld was secure, I say its theirs like that other
poster said quarians lost the right when they lost the war. The geth
then never leave their territory and only attack if their empire is
penetrated. People say this is bad but if the alliance saw a rachni or
geth ship it would instantly be shot down.[/quote]

Homeworld, every single Quarian orbital station and every single Quarian Colony. It's not like they didn't have time to think this over and it happened in the blink of an eye or anything. This was followed by several centuries of refusing interaction with the outside world, blasting anybody who came into their space etc.


[quote]I dont even see how one could argue it is not the quarians who
take the blame. Its not like terminator where they discover skynet is
intelligent at 2am, try to shut it down and by 2:15am the nukes are
launched. This was a bloody war of extermination against a sentient
species that lasted a long time. The quarians should be thankfull the
geth stay in the veil or havent sent an attack force against the migrant
fleet[/quote]

Because "The Quarians" are tens of billions of people, most of whom are innocent but never the less got exterminated by the Geth? Because their attempt to shut down the Quarians occured when only a handful of isolated Geth had gained sentience, and they were hoping to prevent the others from reaching that state, as opposed to killing them all after they were clearly sentients? Because the Geth retaliated by wiping them all out?

All of this is just granting you all the notion that Geth lives are as important as Quarian lives, when really that isn't a clear cut issue at all, and whether the Geth should even have rights isn't either. But whatever.


[quote]Where are you getting this from? First off, it was the Quarians who
first tried to wipe out the Geth as soon as they realized the Geth were
sentient. Second, the Geth were never "waving a shotgun" in the
Quarians' face, metaphorically of course. They went from being a newly
nascent consciousness straight to being the target of a genocide
campaign in one fell swoop, without ever doing anything more threatening
than beginning to think for themselves.[/quote]

In my analogy going to the abortion clinic and booking an appointment is the "try to prevent the rest of the geth from gaining sentience" phase of the deal. The geth waving a shotgun in your face is the Geth uprising. Obviously we're substituting a species for one individula in thre analogy, but...


[quote]
With all polite respectfulness, baloney! When someone launches an
unprovoked surprise invasion of your country and starts systematically
killing every single person they find, are you going to lobby your
government to open diplomatic negotiations with them to find a peaceful
solution? Heck no! You're going to demand immediate mobilization of your
country's entire military to launch an all-out attack on this vicious,
rampaging genocidal enemy. And if you aren't in the military yourself
you're gonna make sure to get the best weapon you can so that you can
kill every single one of these genocidal maniacs who dares to come
anywhere near you or your family.[/quote]

Except "those genocidal maniacs" are the military, and you're supporting the extermination of their civilian population too, many of whom can not be blamed for anything that happened. You're generalizating an entire race of people as being entirely homogonous, where ALL QUARIANS ARE EVIL BECAUSE SOME QUARIANS DID SOMETHING BAD, and this generalization is morally reprehensible.

The geth resisting the attepts at shut down is at least justifiable, and defeating the Quarian military is also justifiable because a war has broken out. What is not justifiable is the extermianion of all Quarians they could get their hands on, and the unwillingness to negotiate peace once it is clear that the Quarians could not win the war.

And once again, the centuries that follow the morning war are also filled with unjustifiable behaviour by rejecting any and all contact with the outside world by destroying anybody who came into their territory regardless of intent.


[quote]Still, if you don't wanna get wiped out, don't go around launching
unprovoked wars of genocide.[/quote]

You're acting like it was obviously genocide and that the Quarians knew all of the facts of the matter. A.I.s were and continue to be highly dangerous in-unvierse, and preventing a race of A.I.'s from developing is an understandable concern. That the geth behaved the way they did in response is just reinforcing this notion that they are inherently dangerous - they committed genocide in retaliation even when it wasn't necessary to survive.

Secondly, the Geth weren't all sentient at that stage, or rather the Quarians didn't realize they all were. They thought it was just an isolated thing, and wanted to shut them down before it could become widespread. So even if you want to argue that what they did was effectively genocide, it was not known to be such to the Quarians at the time. And again, this is based on the somewhat tenuous assumption that shutting down a bunch of robots is genocide, a position I'm sure most people in MEverse do not share with you.

Saying "you shouldn't commit genocide if you don't expect to be wiped out in response" is also somewhat naive to say, because you're still failing to take into account the vast array of people who are innocent because they were too young to know what was going on, who were uninvolved in the proceedings, who did not know about the proceedings, or who were actively protesting the shut-down. All of these people were killed because some Quarians decided to shut the geth down. To make another analogy, this would be like arguing that all humans deserve to be destroyed because some humans have committed genocide.


[quote]
Seriously, though, these innocent Quarians of whom you speak should
not hate the Geth for what happened to their race.[/quote]

Their hate is perfectly justified because the Geth response was disproportionate, which is something we've been arguing here. It doens't matter if the Geth were provoked, their response was not acceptable.

[quote]I mean just look at the hypocrisy: a Quarian whose people launched an
unprovoked war of genocide complaining that the defender went too far in
fighting back against imposed extinction?! That is whack![/quote]

If all the Geth did was kill the people who tried to shut them down nobody would be complaining about anything. Once again you're displaying the attiude that all Quarians area guilty of the sins that only a few of them have mad.e