The human (good) the elf (bad) the dwarf (ugly)
#1
Posté 03 février 2011 - 04:18
This is just my opinion
Just wondering if anyone else has this problem.
#2
Posté 03 février 2011 - 04:21
#3
Posté 03 février 2011 - 04:21
#4
Posté 03 février 2011 - 04:22
#5
Posté 03 février 2011 - 04:23
#6
Guest_distinguetraces_*
Posté 03 février 2011 - 04:25
Guest_distinguetraces_*
Despite the tiny percentage who choose non-humans when given a range of options, I think a DA game with a Dalish elf protagonist could connect with a mass audience if he weren't presented as "the elfin option" but simply as "our hero, Stabsalot."
And if he were extremely butch.
#7
Posté 03 février 2011 - 04:26
#8
Posté 03 février 2011 - 04:28
distinguetraces wrote...
"our hero, Stabsalot."
And if he were extremely butch.
I would definitely be taking a pass on that game.
#9
Posté 03 février 2011 - 04:30
#10
Posté 03 février 2011 - 04:33
I would not mind a Elf PC in the future though
#11
Posté 03 février 2011 - 04:39
#12
Posté 03 février 2011 - 04:41
Modifié par hart37, 03 février 2011 - 04:42 .
#13
Posté 03 février 2011 - 04:42
Of course the second time around I was a human arcane warrior so that is where I am. Of course both times were very entertaining because the first play-through I did what my character would have done and the second I did what I would have done.
Anyway Bioware is aware that most people who play the game played humans (They even quoted some statistics in one of these threads) and I seriously doubt they would release a game with either just elf or dwarf as your only option. But I certainly did appreciate the option in DAO.
Edit: Hu go figure. Did not realize **** counted as a swear word.
Modifié par Denvian, 03 février 2011 - 04:45 .
#14
Posté 03 février 2011 - 04:44
Denvian wrote...
Well I had a problem playing a noble in DAO because I did not want to be a over privileged **** so that left me with either being a human mage or a non-human warrior.
Your human noble in DAO can be remarkably egalitarian.
#15
Posté 03 février 2011 - 04:48
Denvian wrote...
Well I had a problem playing a noble in DAO because I did not want to be a over privileged jerk so that left me with either being a human mage or a non-human warrior. Since I wanted to be a dual wielding warrior that left me with Elf (Oh yeah I also have a problem being a dwarf). Anyway of course I do not want to be a fruity male elf so I decided to go with a female elf because if I am going to go with a character that is not like me at all I am going to go all the way to a different gender.
Of course the second time around I was a human arcane warrior so that is where I am. Of course both times were very entertaining because the first play-through I did what my character would have done and the second I did what I would have done.
Anyway Bioware is aware that most people who play the game played humans (They even quoted some statistics in one of these threads) and I seriously doubt they would release a game with either just elf or dwarf as your only option. But I certainly did appreciate the option in DAO.
Edit: Hu go figure. Did not realize **** counted as a swear word.
I agree with the Human nobel. The character was rich, cocky and such a toss. Another reason why I didn't play as a human, I like playing Rogue or warrior. Maybe if there was a commoner option in Origins I would have considered it, especially if they were cockney
#16
Posté 03 février 2011 - 04:48
#17
Posté 03 février 2011 - 04:49
#18
Posté 03 février 2011 - 04:50
marshalleck wrote...
Denvian wrote...
Well I had a problem playing a noble in DAO because I did not want to be a over privileged **** so that left me with either being a human mage or a non-human warrior.
Your human noble in DAO can be remarkably egalitarian.
He certainly could be if you made him that way but I still would have a problem with a bourgeoisie upbringing and the first play through I had no idea really.
#19
Posté 03 février 2011 - 04:51
A what?LexXxich wrote...
a pre-justice,
limiting the character to one race or more importantly, a more clearly defined identity can also result in a tighter and more interesting narrative than one which has to be watered-down and simplified to make it "one size fits all."
#20
Posté 03 février 2011 - 04:51
Denvian wrote...
marshalleck wrote...
Denvian wrote...
Well I had a problem playing a noble in DAO because I did not want to be a over privileged **** so that left me with either being a human mage or a non-human warrior.
Your human noble in DAO can be remarkably egalitarian.
He certainly could be if you made him that way but I still would have a problem with a bourgeoisie upbringing and the first play through I had no idea really.
How could a nobleman have a bourgeoisie upbringing? Wouldn't it be aristocratic, if anything?
#21
Posté 03 février 2011 - 04:52
#22
Posté 03 février 2011 - 04:55
Ha! Very true my good man!How could a nobleman have a bourgeoisie upbringing? Wouldn't it be aristocratic, if anything?
Modifié par Denvian, 03 février 2011 - 04:57 .
#23
Posté 03 février 2011 - 04:56
hart37 wrote...
I agree with the Human nobel. The character was rich, cocky and such a toss. Another reason why I didn't play as a human, I like playing Rogue or warrior.
And yet your most played characters were dwarves? Not dwarf noble I hope, since they were far more arrogant and condescending than the human noble. Hysterically so in some cases, such as addressing others indirectly through your right hand man.
Anyways clearly you did not spend much time at all with human noble, since you say you prefer to play warriors and rogues--that's all the human noble could be! The human mage was not nobility, at least not in a practical sense.
#24
Posté 03 février 2011 - 05:00
#25
Posté 03 février 2011 - 05:40





Retour en haut







