Val Seleznyov wrote...
Babli wrote...
Nice speech man. I wonder what girls/women on this forum think about your..ehm...enlightened viewVal Seleznyov wrote...
I find it interesting that the only people that bring up Miranda's overt sexualism are the codex zealots and armour fundamentalists.
I'm capable of looking at Miranda and seeing past that -- seeing what her outfits really say about her as a human being. But like i said in another thread, i just have a more enlightened attitude on women and equality.
I'm sure that many of them would agree with me.
Most of you are completely missing the point though. It's not about putting a woman in skintight clothing. I'd feel the same way if Miranda's outfit was a tracksuit.
It is established that she's good at what she does, and that she takes pride in her appearance. She's confident enough that her desire to look the way that she wants to look entices her to disregard battlefield practicality to a small extent.
Putting her in armour is a total disregard for her confidence, combat ability and desire to look a certain way. That's not a good message for women.
Miranda is said to be very inteligent ...yet you are insinuating that her confidence or should I say ego is so big that she will blatantly look over any practical/lore based advantage of use of proper armor protection for enhancing her personal feeling of superiority?
Modifié par Remus Artega, 06 février 2011 - 11:33 .





Retour en haut




