297 réponses à ce sujet

[Fatex3]

The Rogue daggers in the screen shots remind me of Assassin's Daggers in Guild Wars.

[TJPags]

Filament wrote...

She's holding the sword with one hand at the very top of the hilt (near the cross guard), with the sword behind her back in preparation for a slam much like Mario with his Donkey Kong hammer. She's not facing away from the hurlock.

I've zoomed that thing up to 400% magnification.  I still don't see a hand on the hilt.  Hell, I can't even see her arms.  I also can't see her face . . .I see black where the face should be - I'm assuming that's the back of her head.

If she is preparing to slam it at the hurlock, is she using it like a spear?  That's the only way the sword can be in that position and intended to hit that hurlock.

Oh wait - she's in the foreground relative to the hurlock?  Is that it?

If so, her aim is off . . . .

[PsychoBlonde]

ViSeirA wrote...

Just found these at GameTree

Is this a Qunari wearing a *shirt*?  I can't think of anything else it may be.

[TJPags]

That silhouette really helped.  Now, the picture makes sense.

That is one bad screenshot, or the lighting in the game was awful, or the resolution was awful . . . or the graphics are going to have me beating my head against a desk.

[Pseudo the Mustachioed]

PsychoBlonde wrote...

Is this a Qunari wearing a *shirt*?  I can't think of anything else it may be.

Hawke?

[NightmarezAbound]

PsychoBlonde wrote...

ViSeirA wrote...

Just found these at GameTree

Is this a Qunari wearing a *shirt*?  I can't think of anything else it may be.

Rogue Male Hawke slicing up a darkspawn. 
 Two weapon style,  the rogue red armour.

[Apollo Starflare]

Looking good! These seem like they were just taken during gameplay unlike most screenshots we get which are obviously carefully designed/picked. Graphics aren't important to me, but it definitely looks better than Origins did on the Xbox.

Pseudocognition wrote...

PsychoBlonde wrote...

Is this a Qunari wearing a *shirt*?  I can't think of anything else it may be.

Hawke?

Yeah, it's just rogue Hawke after stabbing a Hurlock?

[lazuli]

Fatex3 wrote...

The Rogue daggers in the screen shots remind me of Assassin's Daggers in Guild Wars.

I pointed this out in another thread, but they look an awful lot like Ungues.  With the new angles these screenshots provide, though, the comparison is no longer as strong.

[tondratic]

 

I. . .kinda hope the visual effect of whatever ability Hawke's using will look less like, um, micturition when I actually play the game. 

Just so you know, I feel horrible for noticing this too.

[PrinceOfFallout13]

TJPags wrote...

That silhouette really helped.  Now, the picture makes sense.

That is one bad screenshot, or the lighting in the game was awful, or the resolution was awful . . . or the graphics are going to have me beating my head against a desk.

or you may never see it ingame since i doubt you will do the exact move at the same exact location

[PsychoBlonde]

TJPags wrote...

That is one bad screenshot, or the lighting in the game was awful, or the resolution was awful . . . or the graphics are going to have me beating my head against a desk.

They're bad screenshots.  Still nice to see, though, but they aren't "set up" like the official shots so they all look a bit awkward.

[PrinceOfFallout13]

RitaChe wrote...

 

I. . .kinda hope the visual effect of whatever ability Hawke's using will look less like, um, micturition when I actually play the game. 

Just so you know, I feel horrible for noticing this too.

remember how you take pictures while talking and how hideous it looks? exactly (pictures on things in motion makes things look uglier)

[xXSnak3Eat3rXx]

Wow, the textures look terrible. Even Fallout 3 looks better than this.

Modifié par xXSnak3Eat3rXx, 06 février 2011 - 01:33 .

[Cutlasskiwi]

xXSnak3Eat3rXx wrote...

Wow, the textures look terrible. Even Fallout 3 looks better than this.

Really? I think this looks much better than Fallout 3 ever did, without mods. 

[Amyntas]

Some screenshots look great, and then there are screenshots like this. The graphical quality seems all over the place. Makes me even more interested in the demo so I can see the truth for myself.

[L0ckd0wn325]

I like the graphics they are a mix between realistic and cell shaded it looks awesome and different and I support that.

[TJPags]

PrinceOfFallout13 wrote...

TJPags wrote...

That silhouette really helped.  Now, the picture makes sense.

That is one bad screenshot, or the lighting in the game was awful, or the resolution was awful . . . or the graphics are going to have me beating my head against a desk.

or you may never see it ingame since i doubt you will do the exact move at the same exact location

Oh sure, I never may see this scene.

What I'm hoping is that I don't see others as bad.

[Brockololly]

RitaChe wrote...

I. . .kinda hope the visual effect of whatever ability Hawke's using will look less like, um, micturition when I actually play the game. 

Just so you know, I feel horrible for noticing this too.

When you gotta go, you gotta go.

Modifié par Brockololly, 06 février 2011 - 01:57 .

[DragonOfWhiteThunder]

Falls Edge wrote...

If they're smart enough to know that their thighs have, like a billion nerves in them, they're smart enough to wear armor on their back.

Not necessarily. In David Eddings'...umm...the books involving Sparhawk, one nation had completely ineffectual armor. Why? Because the paladins that completely destroyed them the last time they went to war wore armor, and the people of that nation are terrified of those knights. Thus their armor is designed to intimidate, because they found it incredibly intimidating. They are completely unaware of the protective value it has.

Darkspawn could work the same way.

[Falls Edge]

DragonOfWhiteThunder wrote...

Falls Edge wrote...

If they're smart enough to know that their thighs have, like a billion nerves in them, they're smart enough to wear armor on their back.

Not necessarily. In David Eddings'...umm...the books involving Sparhawk, one nation had completely ineffectual armor. Why? Because the paladins that completely destroyed them the last time they went to war wore armor, and the people of that nation are terrified of those knights. Thus their armor is designed to intimidate, because they found it incredibly intimidating. They are completely unaware of the protective value it has.

Darkspawn could work the same way.

They don't look intimidating though, they look silly, like they don't know how to dress themselves in the morning or something. <_<

Edit: Maybe a dev person can answer this question, it isn't really a harmful question and doesn't spoil the game in anyway. I guess maybe they were trying to go with the 'barbarian' or 'berserker' look, but then they did that wrong too by strapping chunks of heavy metal to themselves instead of leather.

Now that I think about it, maybe the change went because of their potrayal as children in awakening, so they adapted how they wore armor accordingly.

Modifié par Falls Edge, 06 février 2011 - 02:18 .

[The Bard From Hell]

So, Rogues get giant batrangs as weapons? Nice to know... I mean really nice to know, I love doble weapons, and dual wielding them makes it even better. I can see why the devs (Mr. Laidlaw, if memory serves me right) said that some blades look really cool.

[crimzontearz]

MMMMMMM......looks delicious

[crimzontearz]

the more I see Aveline the more I think she should rise her sword aloft and say "by the power of greyskull"