Aller au contenu

Photo

Did the Geth commit genocide?


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
349 réponses à ce sujet

#26
wulf3n

wulf3n
  • Members
  • 1 339 messages

General User wrote...
To my knowledge, none of the former quarian worlds have any quarians living on them now.


Genocide isn't about a race being on their home planet, its about them being extinct. Since the quarians had enough numbers to sustain a viable population at the end of the morning war, the geth obviously didn't make them extinct, so they didn't commit genocide.

#27
Atmosfear3

Atmosfear3
  • Members
  • 1 654 messages
Based on the questions that Legion asks Shepard on the Normandy, I've come to this conclusion:



- If your toaster and vacuum one day asks you if it has a soul, what would be your first reaction? I don't know about you guys but I'd smash the thing to pieces and wonder what other machines are talking. That is a natural human response. The Quarians may not be human but we can assume most sentient species share characteristics.

- The Geth are obviously still exploring their sentience. They may not realize the difference between a soldier, a child, an elderly, etc.

- Legion has mentioned that the Geth (read: not Heretics) are caretakers on the Quarian worlds now, cleaning away toxins and debris from the war. Its obvious that the Geth don't hold some sort of grudge (and probably not capable of either). Their response in the Morning War is most likely just a reaction.

#28
Phaedon

Phaedon
  • Members
  • 8 617 messages

wulf3n wrote...

General User wrote...
To my knowledge, none of the former quarian worlds have any quarians living on them now.


Genocide isn't about a race being on their home planet, its about them being extinct. Since the quarians had enough numbers to sustain a viable population at the end of the morning war, the geth obviously didn't make them extinct, so they didn't commit genocide.

The UN would like to have a word with you.

"any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, anationalethnicalracial or religious group,"

Modifié par Phaedon, 06 février 2011 - 08:03 .


#29
wulf3n

wulf3n
  • Members
  • 1 339 messages

Phaedon wrote...
The UN would like to have a word with you.

"any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, anationalethnicalracial or religious group,"


Im not saying they didn't "attempt" genocide, they just didn't commit genocide.

#30
James2912

James2912
  • Members
  • 1 339 messages

wulf3n wrote...

General User wrote...
To my knowledge, none of the former quarian worlds have any quarians living on them now.


Genocide isn't about a race being on their home planet, its about them being extinct. Since the quarians had enough numbers to sustain a viable population at the end of the morning war, the geth obviously didn't make them extinct, so they didn't commit genocide.



Genocide is the mass killing of a people not their extinction.

Modifié par James2912, 06 février 2011 - 08:23 .


#31
AkiKishi

AkiKishi
  • Members
  • 10 898 messages

Phaedon wrote...

wulf3n wrote...

General User wrote...
To my knowledge, none of the former quarian worlds have any quarians living on them now.


Genocide isn't about a race being on their home planet, its about them being extinct. Since the quarians had enough numbers to sustain a viable population at the end of the morning war, the geth obviously didn't make them extinct, so they didn't commit genocide.

The UN would like to have a word with you.

"any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, anationalethnicalracial or religious group,"



What are the following acts?

#32
General User

General User
  • Members
  • 3 315 messages
Genocide is a tough act to follow!

Image IPBImage IPBImage IPBImage IPB


too soon?

Modifié par General User, 06 février 2011 - 08:09 .


#33
Phaedon

Phaedon
  • Members
  • 8 617 messages

BobSmith101 wrote...
What are the following acts?

"killing members of the group; causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group; deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life, calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part; imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group; [and] forcibly transferring children of the group to another group."

#34
wulf3n

wulf3n
  • Members
  • 1 339 messages

James2912 wrote...
Genocide is the mass killing of a people not their extinction.


Yeah, ok. I stand corrected.

But you still have to argue intent. With only 2 known quarian planets, and no information about the battles, and no information about the geths consciousness at the time, it's impossible to tell.

Modifié par wulf3n, 06 février 2011 - 08:12 .


#35
Phaedon

Phaedon
  • Members
  • 8 617 messages

wulf3n wrote...

Phaedon wrote...
The UN would like to have a word with you.

"any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, anationalethnicalracial or religious group,"


Im not saying they didn't "attempt" genocide, they just didn't commit genocide.


"any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, anationalethnicalracial or religious group,"

"any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy

intent



#36
Phaedon

Phaedon
  • Members
  • 8 617 messages

wulf3n wrote...
But you still have to argue intent. With only 2 known quarian planets, and no information about the battles, and no information about the geths consciousness at the time, it's impossible to tell.

the drastic population decline of the Quarians (from billions prebellum to 17 million postbellum)

I doubt all of them were soldiers.

#37
Mecha Tengu

Mecha Tengu
  • Members
  • 1 823 messages
who cares



it's just Quarians anyway

#38
wulf3n

wulf3n
  • Members
  • 1 339 messages

Phaedon wrote...
I doubt all of them were soldiers.


Yes, but civilians do die in war. Then you've got to consider if the early geth even understood the concept of civilian. There are no geth civilians, so maybe geth believed the same to be true of quarians. Same goes for killing. Destroying a geth body doesn't kill the geth, it just gets transferred, maybe the geth thought the same was happening for the quarians.

#39
AkiKishi

AkiKishi
  • Members
  • 10 898 messages

Phaedon wrote...

BobSmith101 wrote...
What are the following acts?

"killing members of the group; causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group; deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life, calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part; imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group; [and] forcibly transferring children of the group to another group."


Thanks.

I'm still not sure that you could say the Geth had intent.

#40
James2912

James2912
  • Members
  • 1 339 messages

Mecha Tengu wrote...

who cares

it's just Quarians anyway


please leave this thread if you have nothing to contribute. Thank you very much.

#41
Phaedon

Phaedon
  • Members
  • 8 617 messages

wulf3n wrote...
Yes, but civilians do die in war. Then you've got to consider if the early geth even understood the concept of civilian. There are no geth civilians, so maybe geth believed the same to be true of quarians. Same goes for killing. Destroying a geth body doesn't kill the geth, it just gets transferred, maybe the geth thought the same was happening for the quarians.

No, you can't accidentally kill billions of civvies. And again, if the geth could not tell soldier from civvie, then they would be simple robots, with no sentience. Which is wrong.

#42
Mr.BlazenGlazen

Mr.BlazenGlazen
  • Members
  • 4 159 messages
Yes.

#43
StarGateGod

StarGateGod
  • Members
  • 537 messages
no, they didnt it was war, and the quaians kept fighting to the very end. it would of been differnet if they had given up and the geth continued to kill them. Its like the japanese it WW2, if we hadnt droped the nule on them we would have killed everyone on that island becuase they would have fought to the last m,an woman and child

#44
James2912

James2912
  • Members
  • 1 339 messages

StarGateGod wrote...

no, they didnt it was war, and the quaians kept fighting to the very end. it would of been differnet if they had given up and the geth continued to kill them. Its like the japanese it WW2, if we hadnt droped the nule on them we would have killed everyone on that island becuase they would have fought to the last m,an woman and child


There actions fit the definition of genocide whether they were justified is a matter of opinion. But its is a fact they comitted genocide. 

P.S. There is another thread below this one that is just about whether the Geth are justified in comitting genocide. 

Modifié par James2912, 06 février 2011 - 09:01 .


#45
Chuvvy

Chuvvy
  • Members
  • 9 686 messages
Both sides sort of did. Just the only ones that are still talking about it are the Quarians.

#46
CroGamer002

CroGamer002
  • Members
  • 20 672 messages
Yes, they did genocide but I don't think they intended to do it.

Most of them weren't even sentient, let alone sapient then.

They were just fighting for their survival.

#47
James2912

James2912
  • Members
  • 1 339 messages
I think the Geth have or are learning from their actions. I look forward to hearing more about have Geth have "evolved" since the war.

#48
bookwurmneo

bookwurmneo
  • Members
  • 38 messages

StarGateGod wrote...

no, they didnt it was war, and the quaians kept fighting to the very end. it would of been differnet if they had given up and the geth continued to kill them. Its like the japanese it WW2, if we hadnt droped the nule on them we would have killed everyone on that island becuase they would have fought to the last m,an woman and child


--Removed response to WW2 as it wasn't relevant to discussion--

More Importantly in terms of this debate we don't know if the quarians would have fought to last man and evidently they didn't as a large number of them fled.  We don't know the basic tactics or goals of the geth or quarians of that time, the geth could have simply decided to destroying the quarians was the most efficient way to save themselves.

Finally, The morality of the geths actions doesn't decide whether or not it was genocide; what decides genocide is whther or not the geth went thru the process of systematically destroying the quarians.  Say if earth was invaded by a race of cannabilistic aliens and theonly way to survive is to completely destroy their species.  While the act is necessary it sill would be genocide.

Modifié par bookwurmneo, 06 février 2011 - 09:44 .


#49
James2912

James2912
  • Members
  • 1 339 messages

bookwurmneo wrote...

StarGateGod wrote...

no, they didnt it was war, and the quaians kept fighting to the very end. it would of been differnet if they had given up and the geth continued to kill them. Its like the japanese it WW2, if we hadnt droped the nule on them we would have killed everyone on that island becuase they would have fought to the last m,an woman and child


First of in regards to the Atomic attacks on Japan during WW2, The use of nuclear weapons was contested at time of the attacks and is still up for debate.

More Importantly in terms of this debate we don't know if the quarians would have fought to last man and evidently they didn't as a large number of them fled.  We don't know the basic tactics or goals of the geth or quarians of that time, the geth could have simply decided to destroying the quarians was the most efficient way to save themselves.

Finally, The morality of the geths actions doesn't decide whether or not it was genocide; what decides genocide is whther or not the geth went thru the process of systematically destroying the quarians.  Say if earth was invaded by a race of cannabilistic aliens and theonly way to survive is to completely destroy their species.  While the act is necessary it sill would be genocide.


Exactly! 

#50
Pro_Consul

Pro_Consul
  • Members
  • 481 messages

General User wrote...

Whatever their motivations, following the Morning War, the geth either wiped out the quarian survivors not on the Flotilla, or allowed them to die when they could have prevented it. Either way constitutes genocide.


Those are not the only two possibilities. Option #3: the non-evacuating surviving Quarians died because they were left behind on a planet that they themselves had rendered uninhabitable with their relentless "attack, ATTACK, ATTACK!!!!" approach to warfare, and the Geth were powerless to do anything about that.