I don't think the Geth "regret" anything. They just don't know better. They were created to take care of all the mundane tasks for the Quarians, and since they can't yet find a purpose of their own, they just keep on doing stuff to busy themselves with something.Yakko77 wrote...
Given how little we know about the "Morning War" it seems clear the Geth regret for lack of better term the result hence their actions as "caretaker" of the Quarian homeworld. The Geth actions may have initially been in "self defense" but when it devolves into what can be literally describes as genocide, is it still "self defense"? Again, we know too little about the war and how it progressed. I'm almost certain there will be a way for the Quarians to negotiate the retaking of their homeworld without a fight in ME3 given what Legion said about being caretakers in a manner like Arlington National Cemerary.
Did the Geth commit genocide?
#151
Posté 07 février 2011 - 07:58
#152
Posté 07 février 2011 - 08:08
Zulu_DFA wrote...
I don't think the Geth "regret" anything. They just don't know better. They were created to take care of all the mundane tasks for the Quarians, and since they can't yet find a purpose of their own, they just keep on doing stuff to busy themselves with something.Yakko77 wrote...
Given how little we know about the "Morning War" it seems clear the Geth regret for lack of better term the result hence their actions as "caretaker" of the Quarian homeworld. The Geth actions may have initially been in "self defense" but when it devolves into what can be literally describes as genocide, is it still "self defense"? Again, we know too little about the war and how it progressed. I'm almost certain there will be a way for the Quarians to negotiate the retaking of their homeworld without a fight in ME3 given what Legion said about being caretakers in a manner like Arlington National Cemerary.
The Geth took on a "caretaker" role regarding the Quarian homeworld for a reason. They could've just abandoned it after the war or even occupied it but they chose to live on space stations.
We just don't know what reason it truly is yet.
Regret, redemption, love... you name it.
#153
Guest_iOnlySignIn_*
Posté 07 février 2011 - 08:10
Guest_iOnlySignIn_*
I didn't mean that the Quarians's central purpose in the Morning War was to *destroy* (or deactivate) the Geth. Their central purpose in the Morning War was to *re-enslave* the Geth by eliminating their abilities of independent thought and consciousness, i.e. Admiral Xen's approach. Admiral Gerrel and Admiral Koris's camps (Gerrel: revenge through another war; Koris: apology and peace) only came into being *after* the Morning War.Zulu_DFA wrote...
No, that doesn't make much sense. "We can't live without them, so let's permanantly deactivate them." Even the Quarians aren't that stupid. The were syupid enough thoug to for the last resort option before exploring other options, and that means they could have been stupid enough to not realize that they couldn't live without the Geth.iOnlySignIn wrote...
Which is probably why the Quarians freaked out when the Geth first rebelled. If the Quarians could live just as well without the Geth, why not just grant them freedom and let whichever Geth willing to continue serving the Quarians continue? Isn't giving up part of your property preferrable to death? It's the same reason why Romans crushed all the slave rebellions - they can't possibly maintain their lifestyle without the slaves and the whole socio-economic structure would collapse. It's a war for survival on both sides - that makes it the bloodiest of all wars.
The Romans like Crassus slaughtering rebellious slaves like Spartacus's is not for the purpose of killing all slaves, but for the purpose of quelling slave rebellions, making them obedient again. I think the case is the same for the Quarians in the Morning War. I imagine a lot of Geth-hacking by the Quarians went on in the war, and that's where the Geth's famous unhackability came to be known.
But I do admit that I sometimes tacitly assume that every party in every conflict is strategizing completely rationally, while actual and fictional history has proven otherwise. I just thought that even the most unintelligent species (e.g. Krogans) may have some very intelligent leaders (e.g. Wrex, Okeer, Ganar Wrang).
Modifié par iOnlySignIn, 07 février 2011 - 08:21 .
#154
Posté 07 février 2011 - 08:24
Reason: they did pretty much the dame stuff when they were "slaves" to the Quarians.Yakko77 wrote...
The Geth took on a "caretaker" role regarding the Quarian homeworld for a reason.
Dwelling in space stations is more efficient for them. But it must be kind of dull.Yakko77 wrote...
They could've just abandoned it after the war or even occupied it but they chose to live on space stations.
You bet.Yakko77 wrote...
We just don't know what reason it truly is yet.
Even in humans those are chemically determined bodily states. For the Geth it's just math.Yakko77 wrote...
Regret, redemption, love... you name it.
#155
Posté 07 février 2011 - 08:33
iOnlySignIn wrote...
I didn't mean that the Quarians's central purpose in the Morning War was to *destroy* (or deactivate) the Geth. Their central purpose in the Morning War was to *re-enslave* the Geth by eliminating their abilities of independent thought and consciousness, i.e. Admiral Xen's approach. Admiral Gerrel and Admiral Koris's camps (Gerrel: revenge through another war; Koris: apology and peace) only came into being *after* the Morning War.Zulu_DFA wrote...
No, that doesn't make much sense. "We can't live without them, so let's permanantly deactivate them." Even the Quarians aren't that stupid. The were syupid enough thoug to for the last resort option before exploring other options, and that means they could have been stupid enough to not realize that they couldn't live without the Geth.iOnlySignIn wrote...
Which is probably why the Quarians freaked out when the Geth first rebelled. If the Quarians could live just as well without the Geth, why not just grant them freedom and let whichever Geth willing to continue serving the Quarians continue? Isn't giving up part of your property preferrable to death? It's the same reason why Romans crushed all the slave rebellions - they can't possibly maintain their lifestyle without the slaves and the whole socio-economic structure would collapse. It's a war for survival on both sides - that makes it the bloodiest of all wars.
The Romans like Crassus slaughtering rebellious slaves like Spartacus's is not for the purpose of killing all slaves, but for the purpose of quelling slave rebellions, making them obedient again. I think the case is the same for the Quarians in the Morning War. I imagine a lot of Geth-hacking by the Quarians went on in the war, and that's where the Geth's famous unhackability came to be known.
But I do admit that I sometimes tacitly assume that every party in every conflict is strategizing completely rationally, while actual and fictional history has proven otherwise. I just thought that even the most unintelligent species (e.g. Krogans) may have some very intelligent leaders (e.g. Wrex, Okeer, Ganar Wrang).
Tali said in ME1, that the order was to "deactivate all geth". For the Geth it meant desctruction, as even it the Quarians tried later to "re-enslave" the mobile platforms, they would have serieously changed the programming, algorythms, limited networking capabilities and purged all memory banks. In other words, they would have destroyed the Geth.
Xen's program seems to be more limited than that: hack 'em and install Isaac Asimov's "Three Laws", which would probably mean keeping the gestalt intelect of the Geth intact, while "enslaving" it. But to me it seems like it's the most fresh approach.
Modifié par Zulu_DFA, 07 février 2011 - 08:35 .
#156
Guest_iOnlySignIn_*
Posté 07 février 2011 - 08:53
Guest_iOnlySignIn_*
Hm, I agree that for the Geth deactivation (and possible later reprogamming) means destruction. But Quarians always impress me as mechanical geniuses who make scrap metal to build jump drives (Tali said something like that if you ask her if the new Normandy is giving her any trouble). So naturally I assumed they will reprogram the Geth (with Asimov's Laws perhaps) after deactivating them as that is more efficient use of resources.Zulu_DFA wrote...
iOnlySignIn wrote...
I didn't mean that the Quarians's central purpose in the Morning War was to *destroy* (or deactivate) the Geth. Their central purpose in the Morning War was to *re-enslave* the Geth by eliminating their abilities of independent thought and consciousness, i.e. Admiral Xen's approach. Admiral Gerrel and Admiral Koris's camps (Gerrel: revenge through another war; Koris: apology and peace) only came into being *after* the Morning War.
The Romans like Crassus slaughtering rebellious slaves like Spartacus's is not for the purpose of killing all slaves, but for the purpose of quelling slave rebellions, making them obedient again. I think the case is the same for the Quarians in the Morning War. I imagine a lot of Geth-hacking by the Quarians went on in the war, and that's where the Geth's famous unhackability came to be known.
But I do admit that I sometimes tacitly assume that every party in every conflict is strategizing completely rationally, while actual and fictional history has proven otherwise. I just thought that even the most unintelligent species (e.g. Krogans) may have some very intelligent leaders (e.g. Wrex, Okeer, Ganar Wrang).
Tali said in ME1, that the order was to "deactivate all geth". For the Geth it meant desctruction, as even it the Quarians tried later to "re-enslave" the mobile platforms, they would have serieously changed the programming, algorythms, limited networking capabilities and purged all memory banks. In other words, they would have destroyed the Geth.
Xen's program seems to be more limited than that: hack 'em and install Isaac Asimov's "Three Laws", which would probably mean keeping the gestalt intelect of the Geth intact, while "enslaving" it. But to me it seems like it's the most fresh approach.
I don't think Xen even acknowledges that the Geth are conscious or sentient. I doubt if she'd be kind enough to keep the Geth genstalt intellect intact - that would not only be uncharacteristic of her, but also incredibly stupid - it's much safer and more Xen-like to just wipe their memories and reduce their intellect to the level of insects, and forbid any large scale networking. Better to live with limited functionality than die with rebellious killer bots.
Modifié par iOnlySignIn, 07 février 2011 - 08:56 .
#157
Posté 07 février 2011 - 09:01
Phaedon wrote...
No, you can't accidentally kill billions of civvies. And again, if the geth could not tell soldier from civvie, then they would be simple robots, with no sentience. Which is wrong.
I know this is late but...
You're applying your own current level of perception, on an intelligence, the concept of which is far beyond our understanding. Do you think humans had all these concepts of morality and right and wrong when we first achieved sentience.
Basically what you're saying is you expect a 1yr old child, to have the same reasoning as that of a 20yr old.
#158
Posté 07 février 2011 - 09:09
iOnlySignIn wrote...
I don't think Xen even acknowledges that the Geth are conscious or sentient.
I am pretty sure this is right. Doesn't she refer to them more than once as nothing more than malfunctioning equipment, or something along those lines? She seems to me to be setting herself up to make matters much worse for the Quarians by repeating the biggest mistake the original "switch em off" Quarians made 300 years ago: underestimating the Geth's intelligence. She is planning to meddle in the workings of Geth minds after all, and she clearly doesn't have the first clue how they actually work or how complex they can be any more than Rael Zorah did.
#159
Posté 07 février 2011 - 09:12
wulf3n wrote...
Phaedon wrote...
No, you can't accidentally kill billions of civvies. And again, if the geth could not tell soldier from civvie, then they would be simple robots, with no sentience. Which is wrong.
I know this is late but...
You're applying your own current level of perception, on an intelligence, the concept of which is far beyond our understanding. Do you think humans had all these concepts of morality and right and wrong when we first achieved sentience.
Basically what you're saying is you expect a 1yr old child, to have the same reasoning as that of a 20yr old.
I don't think that applies here because the Geth are machines who share lots of information with each other (and who's to say they didn't have access to information), while a 1yr old baby couldn't do anything like that. Also, the Quarians had the Geth for at least a while, so the Geth could have more info just because of that.
#160
Posté 07 février 2011 - 09:20
Ramirez Wolfen wrote...
I don't think that applies here because the Geth are machines who share lots of information with each other (and who's to say they didn't have access to information), while a 1yr old baby couldn't do anything like that. Also, the Quarians had the Geth for at least a while, so the Geth could have more info just because of that.
That's kinda my point. the geth aren't like anything we know or comprehend, yet ppl seem to be applying there own level of reasoning upon them. There's a difference between data and knowledge. The geth may have the data, but they may not understand it, effectively making them a walking, talking, 1yr old, with the ability to fight as elite soldiers.
#161
Posté 07 février 2011 - 09:28
Ramirez Wolfen wrote...
I don't think that applies here because the Geth are machines who share lots of information with each other (and who's to say they didn't have access to information), while a 1yr old baby couldn't do anything like that. Also, the Quarians had the Geth for at least a while, so the Geth could have more info just because of that.
There is something to what you say here, but I don't think we can simply dismiss the immaturity factor so easily. Consider Legion's playback of that conversation when the early Geth asks about souls and its purpose and so on. That early Geth sounded really childlike in both its way of speaking and the nature of the questions it was asking. And though Legion are nowhere near that childlike, there does at times seem to be a childlike innocence to the tenor of their questions. I think the Geth may actually have been infant-like in certain ways back at the time of the MW. And though they may have since matured somewhat in those particular areas they are still rather childlike. In other ways, however, they are nothing at all like children and never have been, particularly regarding matters of strict mentation. As aliens go they are prolly the most alien of all in the MEverse, or at least are neck and neck with the Reapers. Which is extremely cool.
#162
Posté 07 février 2011 - 09:29
#163
Posté 07 février 2011 - 11:11
Xen wants the Geth specificly for the greater functionality their AI provides. Just look at her fascination with Legion (if you bring him along to talk to her). If she wanted to reduce them to the state of simple mechs, she could have as easly advocated settling a planet and building a mech factory. And I wouldn't call keeping the gestalt intellect intact "kind" at all if it was to be enslaved.iOnlySignIn wrote...
I don't think Xen even acknowledges that the Geth are conscious or sentient. I doubt if she'd be kind enough to keep the Geth genstalt intellect intact - that would not only be uncharacteristic of her, but also incredibly stupid - it's much safer and more Xen-like to just wipe their memories and reduce their intellect to the level of insects, and forbid any large scale networking. Better to live with limited functionality than die with rebellious killer bots.
#164
Posté 07 février 2011 - 12:45
#165
Posté 07 février 2011 - 01:32
BrotherBeavis14 wrote...
I'm not saying that doesn't make them guilty I'm just throwing
another point of view out there to give a more light shedding idea on what the Geth could be thinking. I was making a connection to infants
because of their limited understanding of how the world works that related to the Geth being new to the galaxy. And my
first sentence about expierencing genocide was messed up. I meant to say
it like We(humanity) look at it as a race of people that expierieced genocide and know what it is but the Geth know neither of these.
But should that absolve them of any responsibility though?? There still needs to be consequences for their actions, not just patting them on the hand and telling them their actions are understandable and thusly have no reprecussions.
#166
Posté 07 février 2011 - 01:46
Slayer299 wrote...
But should that absolve them of any responsibility though?? There still needs to be consequences for their actions, not just patting them on the hand and telling them their actions are understandable and thusly have no reprecussions.
Happens frequently as long as it leads to a peaceful outcome. It's in the interests of both sides.
#167
Posté 07 février 2011 - 02:49
Slayer299 wrote...
BrotherBeavis14 wrote...
I'm not saying that doesn't make them guilty I'm just throwing
another point of view out there to give a more light shedding idea on what the Geth could be thinking. I was making a connection to infants
because of their limited understanding of how the world works that related to the Geth being new to the galaxy. And my
first sentence about expierencing genocide was messed up. I meant to say
it like We(humanity) look at it as a race of people that expierieced genocide and know what it is but the Geth know neither of these.
But should that absolve them of any responsibility though?? There still needs to be consequences for their actions, not just patting them on the hand and telling them their actions are understandable and thusly have no reprecussions.
I just said in my first sentence that it doesn't make them not guilty. I only commented because eveybody here seems to think that the Geth knew all the galactic laws and how society is when they first came to be conscious. They aren't made with all the information in the world and need to learn it. It's unfortunate that they learned of organic society and morals until after they whooped the Quarians. I would say they would be held responsible by us and even Legion came to understand the organic thought process and admitted something along the lines that they were responsible.
#168
Posté 07 février 2011 - 03:36
#169
Posté 07 février 2011 - 03:48
In fact, after the Geth survived for so long they faced little threat from quarians. Geth are for all intents immortal and almost impossible to destroy, because their data can be transferred wirelessly to other platforms or servers.
It was one-sided and very bloody decimation of the Quarians.
Whos to assume if the Quarians hadn't attacked then the Geth would have been peaceful as a slave race? I don't think that plausible either.
#170
Posté 07 février 2011 - 06:21
InvincibleHero wrote...
They know cesation of life and indeed that was their plan to exterminate the Quarians to ensure their own survival.
Really? How do you know this?
InvincibleHero wrote...
Geth are highly intelligent and know exactly what they are doing.
"There was a hole."
InvincibleHero wrote...
just becasue they are a machine and not organic is no reason to grant them special rights or a mulligan.
Well, just because you and everyone else has failed to actually prove they committed genocide IS a good reason to assume they didn't. Innocent until proven guilty - ring a bell?
InvincibleHero wrote...
Whos to assume if the Quarians hadn't attacked then the Geth would have been peaceful as a slave race? I don't think that plausible either.
How is this relevant? Please explain, because it sounds like you are not content with just condemning the Geth for what you think, but cannot prove, they have done but also condemning them for something you know they didn't do just because you think they would have done it. I hope I'm wrong on that.
Modifié par Pro_Consul, 07 février 2011 - 06:23 .
#171
Posté 07 février 2011 - 06:36
Pro_Consul wrote...
InvincibleHero wrote...
Geth are highly intelligent and know exactly what they are doing.
"There was a hole."
Huh???? I really don't get that answer other than the obvious Legion reference about his armor.
Well, just because you and everyone else has failed to actually prove they committed genocide IS a good reason to assume they didn't.
I think the problem is that you seem determined to are doing the exact opposite, but for the Geth instead. Every argument you've made about this has been to suggest that the Quarians themselves wiped out over 90% of their race and the Geth were utterly innocent of any wrong doing.
#172
Guest_iOnlySignIn_*
Posté 07 février 2011 - 07:06
Guest_iOnlySignIn_*
Perhaps, but if you ask all the Admirals about the situation on the Alerei, Admiral Xen gives the clearest and most helpful answer (she gave an accurate estimate of number of Geth platforms on the ship, without ever directly partaking in Rael's top-secret project). Perhaps it's Claudia Black's voice, but I've always assumed that she's one of the brightest Quarian minds.Pro_Consul wrote...
iOnlySignIn wrote...
I don't think Xen even acknowledges that the Geth are conscious or sentient.
I am pretty sure this is right. Doesn't she refer to them more than once as nothing more than malfunctioning equipment, or something along those lines? She seems to me to be setting herself up to make matters much worse for the Quarians by repeating the biggest mistake the original "switch em off" Quarians made 300 years ago: underestimating the Geth's intelligence. She is planning to meddle in the workings of Geth minds after all, and she clearly doesn't have the first clue how they actually work or how complex they can be any more than Rael Zorah did.
#173
Posté 07 février 2011 - 07:08
#174
Guest_iOnlySignIn_*
Posté 07 février 2011 - 07:18
Guest_iOnlySignIn_*
I think her efforts are mostly motivated by her sense of ownership ("Their (the Geth's) rightful masters, the Quarian race!"), rather than her fascination with the Geth's *intelligence* in particular. Perhaps she wants to study them, but that doesn't mean she wants to keep them.Zulu_DFA wrote...
Xen wants the Geth specificly for the greater functionality their AI provides. Just look at her fascination with Legion (if you bring him along to talk to her). If she wanted to reduce them to the state of simple mechs, she could have as easly advocated settling a planet and building a mech factory. And I wouldn't call keeping the gestalt intellect intact "kind" at all if it was to be enslaved.iOnlySignIn wrote...
I don't think Xen even acknowledges that the Geth are conscious or sentient. I doubt if she'd be kind enough to keep the Geth genstalt intellect intact - that would not only be uncharacteristic of her, but also incredibly stupid - it's much safer and more Xen-like to just wipe their memories and reduce their intellect to the level of insects, and forbid any large scale networking. Better to live with limited functionality than die with rebellious killer bots.
If you don't bring Legion to the Migrant Fleet, she does not express any fascination/admiration of the Geth. Rather, she compares them to a ship's jump drive or her childhood toys - mere equipments rather than sentient beings. Her fascination with Legion has a much simpler explanation: Legion is unique, an unprecedented Geth platform. Even someone uninterested in AI tech should be impressed by Legion, a Geth platform capable of speech. For Xen, an AI tech expert, it might just be simple professional interest. She may even be thinking that Legion is a particularly dangerous example of what the Geth may become, and therefore must be studied to find its weakness. That her voice sounds excited, perhaps even aroused ("marvelous machine!"), is just Claudia Black being the smoking hot mama that she is.
Anyways, Admiral Xen has way too few lines for us to accurately gauge her intentions.
Modifié par iOnlySignIn, 07 février 2011 - 07:21 .
#175
Posté 07 février 2011 - 07:19
That's an assumption. They understand the cessation of their life, but beyond that we don't know.InvincibleHero wrote...
They know cesation of life
Another assumption. if we knew their plan their'd be no debate. as it stands the goal could have been to merely exile the quarians.InvincibleHero wrote...
and indeed that was their plan to exterminate the Quarians to ensure their own survival.
InvincibleHero wrote...
Geth are highly intelligent and know exactly what they are doing.
Another assumption. The geth were, at the time of the morning war, barely sentient. They had only just achieved the ability to "know" and your assuming they know practically everything.
InvincibleHero wrote...
just becasue they are a machine and not organic is no reason to grant them special rights or a mulligan.
NO, the mulligan comes from the fact that they were a brand new race, barely sentient, that everyone seems to hold up to the standards of those that have achieved space flight.
InvincibleHero wrote...
Whos to assume if the Quarians hadn't attacked then the Geth would have been peaceful as a slave race? I don't think that plausible either.
And that's justification for the quarians? they won't be our slaves so we must kill them all?





Retour en haut




