ApolloCloud wrote...
To each their own, I guess. I enjoy both, but I prefer artistic realism.
The way I see it is that, as far as we know, realism is cursed with the imperfection of randomness, and by that I mean that we can't say for sure that what we see in this world of natural origin was created with any such intention or purpose of being great, whether its from a visual, audiological or any such perspective, but rather, that it may just be the way it is for no real, particular reason. Art, on the other hand, is usually created with such an intention or purpose, and by principle I feel that it has the potential to far surpass reality in that it is not faced by that same imperfection (though there are of course other limitations), so I feel that art, by good reason, should try to seperate itself from realism as much as it possibly can (though there are other issues to take into consideration, such as the person's ability to relate to the piece of art, where a certain degree of realism may be required). I guess I'd say a balance is required, but that I feel it should be leaning far more to the side of imagination than that of realism.
Good post btw.
THIS is the crux of your argument? "Too grounded in reality"?
Whatever.
I'll take based-on-reality 'art' over preposterous/pretentious abstract BS any day of the week, but Maybe I'm Just Not As Smart/Cultured As You.




Ce sujet est fermé
Retour en haut




