LordShrike wrote...
You really did a stellar job at finding out all those wiki entries. I myself tried to find something similar, but was stumped by either my own stupidity, or the total lack of pre-knowledge on the subject. This really is only intelligent guess work to the anatomy of indoc. BUT: So any place descripted as haunted in ME has high possibility of hosting a Indoc. device. Also would like to point out one small detail i found curious; non of the places without an actual Reaper provided any Indoctrinees, just Husks. Maybe the Indoc. requires a active Reaper to be Indoc. otherwise it is just an subliminal message to huskify yourself and those around you. So i guess Dragons Teeth have a Subliminal message device similar to indoc. device in their construction. Without a Reaper you only get insane people with a penchant to impale themselves. So, actual reasoning on the indoctrinees part requires an active response-return from a Reaper or a Reaper device designed for such a thing.
Well, I was afraid my description was too vague, especially because I didn't emphasise that infrasonic waves have very weak penetration, they bounce back even from air... that's why they are used to study weather.
Very good point that there has been only Husks where there has been indoctrination device. I think it's exactly like you describe it. Without Reaper involved in the process, devices can't create but those mindless minions.
I think it's also very interesting that in derelict Reaper we encounter Scions and those exploding kind of husks too. They are also described as improved in comparison to Husks Shep & co met in ME1. So in addition to indoctrination like Saren and Matriarch Benezia Reaper can also create
variety of troops.
indoctrination device + humans = simple Husks.
indoctrination Reaper + humans = Improved Husks, flaming Husks, Scions.
Of course there is also alternate possibility (There was a hole) but I don't really want to think about that.

I think the process of creating Husks is that indoctrination device reprograms target on psychological and physical level. Psychological effect is important to keep target fascinated and coming back into area of influence. Then I guess process continues by manipulating brain and other physiology.
To make simple example: Say if we could find a way to stimulate area of the brain that controls our appetite we could make a person feel either hungry or satisfied no matter if this person actually has a full or empty stomach.
Then indoctrination devices go even further than that. They could re-program a brain to start growing stage again and manipulate other physiology to comply with that. Say some flesh of victims index finger starts turning to bone again and nail changes too, it comes stronger and there are structural changes too, it shapes bit like chisel towards the end. Of course material needs to be taken from somewhere so it's taken slowly from non-essential parts... reproductive system, tongue, digestive system (not too early though) and so on. Process is actually pretty fast and target must not to die in shock or rejection so I think manipulating targets physiology via indoctrination signal might be necessarily too. Anyway, in the end we would get husk that index finger functions like a screw driver. Maybe not very... useful, but well, that's just an example.
Hmm.. did I really wrote all that creepy stuff?
LordShrike wrote...
Witch is loosely tied to this next parts outcome. So, i got thinking on this "how to kill a Reaper" thing with spare time on my hands. I filled a lot of A4s with guess work and solid math to get something useful. I wont bore you with the tech. (and because i really don't feel like repeating my self any more than is neccesary. Deel Wit it...) End result: There is no surefire way to kill them, that won't get instakill-countered. Or worse, turned against you on strategic level. Lets extrapolate: First thing to take in account are the Reapers capabilities themselves. 1: Millions of years of succesful execution of extinction level events. So, they have a information repository spanning all those years detailing all hostile encounters during that time, Or worse; they were there in person(integrated memory of that should give same effective result.). 2:"Cybernetical capabilities and Intellectual processes." Reapers do not view any tactical or strategic conflict as we do. For them any possible engagement has likely already happened during their existence. Leading directly to optimization of execution in processing intensive situations; conflict. Where humans must do the following; Identify, optimize, reorg, communicate, prepare, execute. Reapers can; Identify, execute. Reapers enter any conflict with a significant advantage in execution times and preformed tactics and strategies. even with out the material advantage. Reapers can also communicate possible scenarios with an significant speed boost due to being cybernetical in nature.
These are just part of what i put together, maybe i'll add them later. But this is the thing that got me derailed mid-process: How did the Geth got the "brilliant" idea to follow Nazara? They can't be indoctrinated. I looked at the mess of papers i had, full of proof Reapers are going to win; Geth did the exact same thing (albeit much better...) as i had. And came to the conclusion that Reapers are going to win, Argument ensues; some have the "Math error" and become heretics. (Maybe it is the Geth who are in error, not Heretics...)
Ow, my arm hurts... Need better keypad... More to come.
I'm very curious about what you have in your mind. I have odd feeling that there is something there regarding this thing:
Harby (via Collectors) and derelict Reaper produced exactly the same kind of husks. There's no evolution between Reaper cannon fodder produced by Reaper created 37 million years ago and what Harby is producing now. Given the same material (humans) they produce exactly the same kind of troops. It's of course logical, why change the formula that works, but I think that may also hint us that Reapers aren't very creative.
But still, how to defeat them... how does one exactly "out of the box" think a Reaper? Waiting incoming transmission...
Modifié par ZLurps, 20 février 2011 - 06:46 .