ME3 Interview
#51
Posté 13 février 2011 - 08:13
#52
Posté 13 février 2011 - 08:23
Fiery Phoenix wrote...
We won't know anything until May or June, basically around E3.
I'm expecting an epic trailer at E3.
#53
Posté 13 février 2011 - 08:25
That was a promo trailer, not game footage. It didn't really happen in-universe: Miranda was on the Normandy all the time Shepard was building the team, so she could not be there with TIM.Silmane wrote...
Zulu_DFA wrote...
I don't know about you guys, but I'm not going to believe a word, especially from someone who isn't really on the ME3 team.
Only official screenshots and footage are reliable sources for rumors. But even that is subject to change. For instance, in one of the trailers for ME2 Jacob was to be seen in normal hardsuit.
Not sure if you remember, but the dialog from Illusive Man was really weird in the ME2 trailer. "He doesn't even konw what he's getting into. He's building an impressive team. Scouring the galaxy.." Illusive Man put Shep in that position to begin with. Your thoughts on that?
And I agree. I'm not believing anything. That interview was not intended to reveal any info that we didn't already know.
Even the trailers that are supposedly compiled of the in-game material can mix match the characters' lines with visual scenes they don't really have any relation to.
Modifié par Zulu_DFA, 13 février 2011 - 08:29 .
#54
Posté 13 février 2011 - 08:29
[quote]Silmane wrote...
[quote]Zulu_DFA wrote...
snip
[/quote]
That was a promo trailer, not game footage. It didn't really happen in-universe: Miranda was on the Normandy all the time Shepard was building the team, so she could not be there with TIM.
[/quote]
True.
#55
Posté 13 février 2011 - 08:38
#56
Posté 13 février 2011 - 08:44
That's the rules.Nightwriter wrote...
So they will be making ME3 just as accommodating to new players as ME2 was.
#57
Posté 13 février 2011 - 08:58
Zulu_DFA wrote...
That's the rules.Nightwriter wrote...
So they will be making ME3 just as accommodating to new players as ME2 was.
*groans*
Dumb just dumb.
I suppose the CB will end up another email again?
*throws up hands in disgust and walks away*
#58
Posté 13 février 2011 - 09:20
Night, you know that you can complain directly and not post something vague.Nightwriter wrote...
So they will be making ME3 just as accommodating to new players as ME2 was.
And no
http://www.joystiq.c...effect-2-and-3/
Also, Casey Hudson: "We'll go crazy with consequences"
There's a whole thread about this, with sources. Surely it'd take less effort for everyone to check that thread before making assumptions and proceeding to whine about them?
Modifié par Phaedon, 13 février 2011 - 09:23 .
#59
Posté 13 février 2011 - 09:29
Phaedon wrote...
Night, you know that you can complain directly and not post something vague.Nightwriter wrote...
So they will be making ME3 just as accommodating to new players as ME2 was.
And no
http://www.joystiq.c...effect-2-and-3/
Also, Casey Hudson: "We'll go crazy with consequences"
There's a whole thread about this, with sources. Surely it'd take less effort for everyone to check that thread before making assumptions and proceeding to whine about them?
You must be new to the internet. Or maybe just a lapse in thinking.
Gonna go with the latter.
#60
Posté 13 février 2011 - 09:35
Taking additional step = less effort. Sure.Phaedon wrote...
Surely it'd take less effort for everyone to check that thread before making assumptions and proceeding to whine about them?
Why am I not surprized?.. Ah, yes, you think calibrations are elemantary. That's why they take that long.
#61
Posté 13 février 2011 - 09:38
1. Making assumptionZulu_DFA wrote...
Taking additional step = less effort. Sure.Phaedon wrote...
Surely it'd take less effort for everyone to check that thread before making assumptions and proceeding to whine about them?
Why am I not surprized?.. Ah, yes, you think calibrations are elemantary. That's why they take that long.
2. Whining about it
3. ???
4. Profit
1.Check thread
2. ???
3. Profit
#62
Posté 13 février 2011 - 09:40
Phaedon wrote...
1. Making assumptionZulu_DFA wrote...
Taking additional step = less effort. Sure.Phaedon wrote...
Surely it'd take less effort for everyone to check that thread before making assumptions and proceeding to whine about them?
Why am I not surprized?.. Ah, yes, you think calibrations are elemantary. That's why they take that long.
2. Whining about it
3. ???
4. Profit
1.Check thread
2. ???
3. Profit
I AM ASSUMING YOU MEANT BOTH AT ONCE.
YOUR LOGIC SUCKS
Modifié par Adugan, 13 février 2011 - 09:42 .
#63
Posté 13 février 2011 - 09:43
2. Make assumption
3. Check Thread
4. Whine about it
5. ???
6. Profit
#64
Posté 13 février 2011 - 09:47
Fixed only for you.Phaedon wrote...
1. Making assumptionZulu_DFA wrote...
Taking additional step = less effort. Sure.Phaedon wrote...
Surely it'd take less effort for everyone to check that thread before making assumptions and proceeding to whine about them?
Why am I not surprized?.. Ah, yes, you think calibrations are elemantary. That's why they take that long.
2. Whining about it
3. ???
4. Profit
1. Make an assumption
2.Check thread
3. Unmake the assumption
4. ???
5. Profit
#65
Posté 13 février 2011 - 09:50
Phaedon wrote...
Night, you know that you can complain directly and not post something vague.Nightwriter wrote...
So they will be making ME3 just as accommodating to new players as ME2 was.
And no
http://www.joystiq.c...effect-2-and-3/
Also, Casey Hudson: "We'll go crazy with consequences"
There's a whole thread about this, with sources. Surely it'd take less effort for everyone to check that thread before making assumptions and proceeding to whine about them?
Wowz. I do not often get an opportunity to be this honest, or to be so earnest when I say: you took that to a place totally of your own choosing there.
I was wondering about import handling.
#66
Posté 13 février 2011 - 09:51
Yes, because they are very important. More so than those who gave their souls spending months playing the first two titles to ensure they get the best possible experience in the finale.Nightwriter wrote...
So they will be making ME3 just as accommodating to new players as ME2 was.
#67
Posté 13 février 2011 - 09:51
Nightwriter wrote...
Phaedon wrote...
Night, you know that you can complain directly and not post something vague.Nightwriter wrote...
So they will be making ME3 just as accommodating to new players as ME2 was.
And no
http://www.joystiq.c...effect-2-and-3/
Also, Casey Hudson: "We'll go crazy with consequences"
There's a whole thread about this, with sources. Surely it'd take less effort for everyone to check that thread before making assumptions and proceeding to whine about them?
Wowz. I do not often get an opportunity to be this honest, or to be so earnest when I say: you took that to a place totally of your own choosing there.
I was wondering about import handling.
OH SHIZ, THE IRONY!
#68
Posté 13 février 2011 - 09:53
Make an assumption when you don't need to put effort into it at all? Doesn't sound so smart to me.Fixed only for you.Zulu_DFA wrote...
1. Make an assumption
2.Check thread
3. Unmake the assumption
4. ???
5. Profit
Which is my exact point. Don't bother making assumptions that will probably be incorrect when you have some of the answers ready.
Modifié par Phaedon, 13 février 2011 - 09:54 .
#69
Posté 13 février 2011 - 09:53
Zulu_DFA wrote...
That's the rules.Nightwriter wrote...
So they will be making ME3 just as accommodating to new players as ME2 was.
#70
Posté 13 février 2011 - 09:53
Modifié par Greybox_Inception, 13 février 2011 - 09:54 .
#71
Posté 13 février 2011 - 09:56
D'aww, I don't hate new gamers. I welcome them! All must experience the glorifying transcendence that is Mass Effect!Fiery Phoenix wrote...
Yes, because they are very important. More so than those who gave their souls spending months playing the first two titles to ensure they get the best possible experience in the finale.Nightwriter wrote...
So they will be making ME3 just as accommodating to new players as ME2 was.
No, I only have issue with recreating the entire plot status every time they want to bring in a new crowd of gamers.
For after all, making a cohesive trilogy is helping all gamers, old and new. For when you bring in new gamers, won't they want to go back and play game one, and then game two? And then will they not experience our same dismay that their choices and character consistency is not given due attention?
#72
Posté 13 février 2011 - 10:01
You can't become interested in the answers, before you have already made the assumption. And looking for ready answers is not always the best way to seek out the truth. Especially when those ready answers are based on somebody else's assumptions.Phaedon wrote...
Make an assumption when you don't need to put effort into it at all? Doesn't sound so smart to me.Fixed only for you.Zulu_DFA wrote...
1. Make an assumption
2.Check thread
3. Unmake the assumption
4. ???
5. Profit
Which i my exact point. Don't bother making assumptions that will probably be incorrect when you have some of the answers ready.
But Adugan^^ has summed it up better.
Modifié par Zulu_DFA, 13 février 2011 - 10:26 .
#73
Posté 13 février 2011 - 10:03
You can't become interested in the answers, before you have already made the assumption.
You make an assumption for every question? And you complain about the assumption on forums? Yes? Well.
And looking for ready answers is not always the best way to deek out the truth. Especially whaen those ready answers are based on somebody else's assumptions.
um nope
#74
Posté 13 février 2011 - 10:45
GodWood wrote...
Zulu_DFA wrote...
That's the rules.Nightwriter wrote...
So they will be making ME3 just as accommodating to new players as ME2 was.
BEST REPLY EVER!
#75
Posté 13 février 2011 - 10:58
I facepalmed when they said it. Bet that we will heard that in every interview from now.PoliteAssasin wrote...
ME3 a great point of entry. Are
you kidding me?
Funny how my anticipation about ME 3 declines with every single news that appeared since announcement.
Modifié par Babli, 13 février 2011 - 10:58 .





Retour en haut







