Saves eliminate any real cost you may attempt to attach to respecs. So why even bother to try? Attach a nominal gold fee per respec as a matter of convenience and leave it at that--which is what it's sounding like they've decided to do, if other posters are correct. Let people play and enjoy the game rather than fight with it. It's a single player game anyways, there's no "imbalance" or advantage gained that isn't already superceded by the ability to directly rewind time by loading a quicksave, which arguably breaks far more than letting a player trade out 1% damage increase for 1 second less cooldown on an ability.TJPags wrote...
marshalleck wrote...
Abuse? Break the game? It would break the game no more than relying on a massive cache of quicksaves breaks the game. It merely circumvents the inane drudgery of file management. And much of the need for respecs could be done away with by making tooltips reasonably useful compared to their uselessness in DAO.
I'm sorry but I just don't believe that fun or interesting gameplay is being forced to play a retarded character build because you had no idea that the spell you thought sounded cool from the description actually completely sucks in practice. That's one facet of old-school RPG game design that deserves to be shot out of a cannon into the sun and never used again.
I grant that the descriptions can and should be informative.
The difference is that saves make you replay everything from the save forward. So you'd have to save, level up, choose your spell, go someplace, fight something to test it, and then if you don't like it, load the save, try another spell, etc.
Much more effort there, IMO, then buying a re-spec for, say, 6 gold, changing your entire spell tree, go fight, don't like the new spell tree, go spnd another 6 gold and rinse and repeat.
However, if the problem is the skill/spell description - and yes, some of them in DA:O and DA:A were lacking, to say the least - then the solution is to fix that, not give you endless re-spec with no real cost.
Modifié par marshalleck, 14 février 2011 - 04:19 .





Retour en haut







