Chouan wrote...
Maelora wrote...
Stating your opinion as fact is just misleading people, like the above posters.
Chouan wrote...
THIS is a fact: month or so ago, Mike Laidlaw said this in an interview with RPG France: "* Concerning the romances and love
interest, are all the followers subject to this if I take in account the
two genders of Hawke?
Not every follower is interested romantically in Hawke, though there are options for players of all genders and orientations." That is (at least to people who aren't trolls or complete morons) 100% confirmation that there are s/s-romanceable companions.
No, you are wrong. Even I who know only basic English see at once you are wrong.
How the sentence can be logically interpreted is that
there are options for all genders and orientations, and those options
can be other than "followers".
It does not say there is for 100% sure all options served by "followers", and I don't begin to speculate what they meant when they wrote that.
Modifié par moilami, 20 février 2011 - 08:34 .