Aller au contenu

Photo

Dragon Age 2 Romances confirmed


6813 réponses à ce sujet

#4426
Ryzaki

Ryzaki
  • Members
  • 34 427 messages

MorningBird wrote...
I don't need to dream!  It's the truth!:o

Honestly, the ONLY thing I'm hoping right now is that there are no 'gender-favorite' bi romances, and by that, what I mean to say is that I hope we don't get a scenario like the following:

"If you play a lady!Hawke, you can romance Isabela AND Merrill!  Isn't that great?  Um, but sadly, if your Hawke is a dude, he only get's this guy!"

Or:

"Good news, gang!  Fenris and Anders are both open to a male!Hawke romances!  Unfortunately, since not enough ladies play our games, they can only romance this one chick."

That would sadden me. :crying:  But somehow, I doubt this will happen.  It sounds like completely irrational fear, even inside my head.

So I'm going to ignore it in favor of spreading the word that all of the romances are bi. :P


*shakes head* They wouldn't make everyone bi. Just not going to happen. Ever. I can guarantee you that. 

#4427
MorningBird

MorningBird
  • Members
  • 1 429 messages

Ryzaki wrote...

*shakes head* They wouldn't make everyone bi. Just not going to happen. Ever. I can guarantee you that. 


*stiples fingers* would you care to make a wager on that? ;)

#4428
Ryzaki

Ryzaki
  • Members
  • 34 427 messages

MorningBird wrote...

Ryzaki wrote...

*shakes head* They wouldn't make everyone bi. Just not going to happen. Ever. I can guarantee you that. 


*stiples fingers* would you care to make a wager on that? ;)


O-ho! You wanna bet? 

#4429
MorningBird

MorningBird
  • Members
  • 1 429 messages

Ryzaki wrote...

O-ho! You wanna bet? 


Indeed! *twirls fake moustache* Let's have a gentlemanly/gentlewomanly wager! :D

#4430
Ryzaki

Ryzaki
  • Members
  • 34 427 messages

MorningBird wrote...

Ryzaki wrote...

O-ho! You wanna bet? 


Indeed! *twirls fake moustache* Let's have a gentlemanly/gentlewomanly wager! :D


Alrighty then. What do you want to wager? 

#4431
MorningBird

MorningBird
  • Members
  • 1 429 messages

Ryzaki wrote...

MorningBird wrote...

Ryzaki wrote...

O-ho! You wanna bet? 


Indeed! *twirls fake moustache* Let's have a gentlemanly/gentlewomanly wager! :D


Alrighty then. What do you want to wager? 


Eh, nothing too over the top.  Loser (depending on circumstance) has to post "ISMAELTHEFORSAKEN WAS RIGHT!" or "ISHMAELTHEFORSAKEN LIED TO ME!" into their signature for the duration of their first DA2 play-through? :P

Modifié par MorningBird, 24 février 2011 - 05:02 .


#4432
Ryzaki

Ryzaki
  • Members
  • 34 427 messages

MorningBird wrote...

Ryzaki wrote...

MorningBird wrote...

Ryzaki wrote...

O-ho! You wanna bet? 


Indeed! *twirls fake moustache* Let's have a gentlemanly/gentlewomanly wager! :D


Alrighty then. What do you want to wager? 


Eh, nothing too overthetop.  Loser (depending on circumstance) has to post "ISMAELTHEFORSAKEN WAS RIGHT!" or "ISHMAELTHEFORSAKEN LIED TO ME!" into their signature for the duration of their first DA2 play-through? :P


Agreed. Virtual handshake on it? *offers hand* 

#4433
MorningBird

MorningBird
  • Members
  • 1 429 messages

Ryzaki wrote...

Agreed. Virtual handshake on it? *offers hand* 


*indeed* *virtual return shake* Now we either have to wait for a more obvious leak of the romance details, or March 8th. :P

#4434
lilliful

lilliful
  • Members
  • 593 messages

MorningBird wrote...

Eh, nothing too over the top.  Loser (depending on circumstance) has to post "ISMAELTHEFORSAKEN WAS RIGHT!" or "ISHMAELTHEFORSAKEN LIED TO ME!" into their signature for the duration of their first DA2 play-through? :P


"Ish is wrong" seems like an undue penalty on Ish, though. I vote the penalty is a stupid avatar, chosen by the winning party for the losing party, for the duration of the DA2 play-through.

EDIT: Too late I guess. Poor Ish >.>

Modifié par lilliful, 24 février 2011 - 05:05 .


#4435
Ryzaki

Ryzaki
  • Members
  • 34 427 messages

MorningBird wrote...

*indeed* *virtual return shake* Now we either have to wait for a more obvious leak of the romance details, or March 8th. :P


Well you know deep down I"m right. 

:innocent:

#4436
MorningBird

MorningBird
  • Members
  • 1 429 messages

Ryzaki wrote...

MorningBird wrote...

*indeed* *virtual return shake* Now we either have to wait for a more obvious leak of the romance details, or March 8th. :P


Well you know deep down I"m right. 

:innocent:


Lies and slander! :P

@liliful: not sure I can edit rediculous avs into my profile anyway, I play on console. xD  ALSO, IF ISHMAEL HAS LED ME ASTRAY, I SHALL WEEP SALTY TEARS UNTIL THE FORUM FLOODS. :innocent:

#4437
Ryzaki

Ryzaki
  • Members
  • 34 427 messages

MorningBird wrote...

Ryzaki wrote...

MorningBird wrote...

*indeed* *virtual return shake* Now we either have to wait for a more obvious leak of the romance details, or March 8th. :P


Well you know deep down I"m right. 

:innocent:


Lies and slander! :P

@liliful: not sure I can edit rediculous avs into my profile anyway, I play on console. xD  ALSO, IF ISHMAEL HAS LED ME ASTRAY, I SHALL WEEP SALTY TEARS UNTIL THE FORUM FLOODS. :innocent:


Hmph. Keep dreaming! 

Lulz. Get ready to weep then. 

#4438
lilliful

lilliful
  • Members
  • 593 messages
Okay guys, now that you have a bet, let's calm it down a little hahaha. Even though there's no point in betting because they're all bi. Back to what's REALLY important. Lusting after imaginary characters. Speaking of which, not enough Anders love in this thread:



Posted Image

#4439
Ryzaki

Ryzaki
  • Members
  • 34 427 messages
Ah that pic makes me feel bad for poor Anders.


#4440
edgemeltdown

edgemeltdown
  • Members
  • 1 messages
hah! my dreams about wooing bethany in this game is utterly crushed *sigh* T_T lol.

#4441
upsettingshorts

upsettingshorts
  • Members
  • 13 950 messages

Ryzaki wrote...

Well you know deep down I"m right. 

:innocent:


Not in any way I'd be proud of.  It's baseless speculation.  If you're right it'll just be because you got lucky, not because you interpreted any evidence more accurately than anyone else - because there isn't any evidence, other than a lack of it.  Which is not a kind of evidence. 

Modifié par Upsettingshorts, 24 février 2011 - 05:50 .


#4442
Ryzaki

Ryzaki
  • Members
  • 34 427 messages

Upsettingshorts wrote...
Not in any way I'd be proud of.  It's baseless speculation.  If you're right it'll just be because you got lucky, not because you interpreted any evidence more accurately than anyone else - because there isn't any evidence, other than a lack of it.  Which is not a kind of evidence. 


Yes because I was obviously so proud of knowing this. I'm practically giddy. Bouncing up and down and giggling like a schoolgirl.

Yes so very proud. 

Modifié par Ryzaki, 24 février 2011 - 05:54 .


#4443
mellifera

mellifera
  • Members
  • 10 061 messages
But you don't know.

#4444
Ryzaki

Ryzaki
  • Members
  • 34 427 messages

yukidama wrote...

But you don't know.


And neither does anyone else. It's all speculation. 

But of course the negative one gets everyone quick to point out that their speculating. 

Modifié par Ryzaki, 24 février 2011 - 05:56 .


#4445
upsettingshorts

upsettingshorts
  • Members
  • 13 950 messages

Ryzaki wrote...

Yes because I was obviously so proud of knowing this. I'm practically giddy. Bouncing up and down and giggling like a schoolgirl.

Yes so very proud. 


What emotion would you use to describe your attachment to this prediction of yours, then?

Ryzaki wrote...

But of course the negative one gets everyone quick to point out that their speculating. 


I seem to recall someone suggesting it being a good idea to ignore those people. 

Modifié par Upsettingshorts, 24 février 2011 - 05:57 .


#4446
mellifera

mellifera
  • Members
  • 10 061 messages
No, I'd probably support you if there were any basis to what you were saying. I just don't believe that the absence of evidence is evidence of absence, to use the cliche.

Modifié par yukidama, 24 février 2011 - 05:57 .


#4447
Ryzaki

Ryzaki
  • Members
  • 34 427 messages

Upsettingshorts wrote...

Ryzaki wrote...

Yes because I was obviously so proud of knowing this. I'm practically giddy. Bouncing up and down and giggling like a schoolgirl.

Yes so very proud. 


What emotion would you use to describe your attachment to this prediction of yours, then?


Who knows. You obviously know me so well you can speak for me? You decided on pride did you not? 

yukidama wrote...

No, I'd probably support you if there were any basis to what you were saying. I just don't believe that the absence of evidence is evidence of absence, to use the cliche.


*shrugs* To each their own. 

Modifié par Ryzaki, 24 février 2011 - 05:59 .


#4448
upsettingshorts

upsettingshorts
  • Members
  • 13 950 messages

Ryzaki wrote...

Who knows. You obviously know me so well you can speak for me? You decided on pride did you not? 


Nice try.  I said not in any way I'd be proud of.  Meaning me.  Because I don't place much value on the accuracy of my predictions, only the effort put into making them.  

If I made a bold prediction based on no effort and no evidence, I wouldn't be proud of it.  How you feel about it remains to be seen.  

Modifié par Upsettingshorts, 24 février 2011 - 06:00 .


#4449
Ryzaki

Ryzaki
  • Members
  • 34 427 messages

Upsettingshorts wrote...
Nice try.  I said not in any way I'd be proud of.  Meaning me.  Because I don't place much value on the accuracy of my prediction, only the effort put into making them.  

If I made a bold prediction based on no effort and no evidence, I wouldn't be proud of it.  How you feel about it remains to be seen.  


And that's you and yes such a bold prediction based on no effort or evidence. Of course. 

#4450
gammle

gammle
  • Members
  • 382 messages
is there only gona be only one female that travels whit the gang?