Aller au contenu

Photo

Dragon Age 2 Romances confirmed


6813 réponses à ce sujet

#6151
Guest_Meta Ray Mek_*

Guest_Meta Ray Mek_*
  • Guests

catabuca wrote...

This isn't the place to get into a debate over what asexuality is or isn't. Seriously, it only leads to bannings and/or thread closure. You should take it to PM for the good of everyone else who would like the thread to stay alive.

(not trying to be forum police, honestly, just don't want to see the thread derailed - we're a happy place :))


Fair enough! =>

... mmmmmmm. Sebastian.

#6152
Trophonius

Trophonius
  • Members
  • 1 032 messages
I wouldn't say Sebastian is asexual himself. Just celibate, which is understandable given that he's a priest. I interpreted the ending of his short story to mean that he transiently questions his faith because of his intimate desires, but that he ultimately chose to stay in the chantry to fulfill his priestly duties, willingly. He is, however, someone that I would consider an option for asexual people who simply don't want to engage in sexual relationships.

#6153
Phate Phoenix

Phate Phoenix
  • Members
  • 4 339 messages

Trophonius wrote...

I wouldn't say Sebastian is asexual himself. Just celibate, which is understandable given that he's a priest. I interpreted the ending of his short story to mean that he transiently questions his faith because of his intimate desires, but that he ultimately chose to stay in the chantry to fulfill his priestly duties, willingly. He is, however, someone that I would consider an option for asexual people who simply don't want to engage in sexual relationships.


This is very true, and the distinction should be made. (Trust me, most asexuals won't call a celibate person asexual, simply because we're trying to separate ourselves from that.) However, for an asexual Hawke, Sebastian is perfect.

#6154
Russalka

Russalka
  • Members
  • 3 867 messages
Are priests not allowed to kill either? It is kind of an odd double standard, just like all that censoring with films, series, games et cetera.

#6155
My Avatar is a Lizard

My Avatar is a Lizard
  • Members
  • 1 044 messages

Phate Phoenix wrote...

Trophonius wrote...

I wouldn't say Sebastian is asexual himself. Just celibate, which is understandable given that he's a priest. I interpreted the ending of his short story to mean that he transiently questions his faith because of his intimate desires, but that he ultimately chose to stay in the chantry to fulfill his priestly duties, willingly. He is, however, someone that I would consider an option for asexual people who simply don't want to engage in sexual relationships.


This is very true, and the distinction should be made. (Trust me, most asexuals won't call a celibate person asexual, simply because we're trying to separate ourselves from that.) However, for an asexual Hawke, Sebastian is perfect.

1 more mention of outside sexuality and i debate.

#6156
Maugrim

Maugrim
  • Members
  • 3 639 messages

My Avatar is a Lizard wrote...

Phate Phoenix wrote...

Trophonius wrote...

I wouldn't say Sebastian is asexual himself. Just celibate, which is understandable given that he's a priest. I interpreted the ending of his short story to mean that he transiently questions his faith because of his intimate desires, but that he ultimately chose to stay in the chantry to fulfill his priestly duties, willingly. He is, however, someone that I would consider an option for asexual people who simply don't want to engage in sexual relationships.


This is very true, and the distinction should be made. (Trust me, most asexuals won't call a celibate person asexual, simply because we're trying to separate ourselves from that.) However, for an asexual Hawke, Sebastian is perfect.

1 more mention of outside sexuality and i debate.


Posted Image

#6157
Russalka

Russalka
  • Members
  • 3 867 messages
The chastity is especially odd if Hawke is allowed to sponsor Sebastian back to power. He needs someone to who would give an heir, or at the very least a scruffy concubine!

Modifié par Russalka, 03 mars 2011 - 11:26 .


#6158
My Avatar is a Lizard

My Avatar is a Lizard
  • Members
  • 1 044 messages

makenzieshepard wrote...

My Avatar is a Lizard wrote...

Phate Phoenix wrote...

Trophonius wrote...

I wouldn't say Sebastian is asexual himself. Just celibate, which is understandable given that he's a priest. I interpreted the ending of his short story to mean that he transiently questions his faith because of his intimate desires, but that he ultimately chose to stay in the chantry to fulfill his priestly duties, willingly. He is, however, someone that I would consider an option for asexual people who simply don't want to engage in sexual relationships.


This is very true, and the distinction should be made. (Trust me, most asexuals won't call a celibate person asexual, simply because we're trying to separate ourselves from that.) However, for an asexual Hawke, Sebastian is perfect.

1 more mention of outside sexuality and i debate.


Posted Image

Catabuca cares.
And i'm simply saying that i will debate if this topic is brought up again as it does not pertain to DA2 in anyway and i do not agree
I don't give a **** if you give a **** or not i'm simply saying

#6159
catabuca

catabuca
  • Members
  • 3 229 messages
Oh makenzie ilu so hard right now.

#6160
Curlain

Curlain
  • Members
  • 1 829 messages

Russalka wrote...

The chastity is especially odd if Hawke is allowed to sponsor Sebastian back to power. He needs someone to give an heir or at the very least a scruffy concubine!


Depends on the rules of succession, it's possible he could be allowed to nominate an heir, or adopted someone as his child and heir 

#6161
catabuca

catabuca
  • Members
  • 3 229 messages
It really does make me wonder about Hawke's line in the trailer about ruling by his side.

<3

#6162
Russalka

Russalka
  • Members
  • 3 867 messages
His family was massacred, at least he should continue the bloodline. It does not make sense.

#6163
Mikka-chan

Mikka-chan
  • Members
  • 433 messages
Denying someone else's sexuality is a horrible thing to do. There isn't any difference between telling an asexual person they can't really be asexual because they have 'hormones' or telling a lesbian that she doesn't really like girls, she just hasn't found the right guy yet. Or telling a transexual that despite how their brain and body works, they really aren't the gender they feel themselves to be, because it's wrong or weird.

Is that really the hill you want to stand on? That my sexuality doesn't really exist, despite having never felt aroused, feeling no desire to have sex (or even kiss, for that matter, although I find hugs somewhat comforting), and being able to stare at naked attractive bodies of both genders without feeling anything besides, occasionally, uncomfortable?

I think that's apretty ignorant hill to stand on. There are quite a few studies on asexuality: hell, wikipedia has names of what, twenty some? Where are these studies that 'prove' their is no asexuality (preferably having been done in, say, the last twenty or so years by a University or group that isn't crazy)?

#6164
lilliful

lilliful
  • Members
  • 593 messages

makenzieshepard wrote...

*snip*

That cat is so cute!

...

......

WHY SER POUNCE-A-LOT, WHY? *breaks into a fresh batch of tears*

#6165
My Avatar is a Lizard

My Avatar is a Lizard
  • Members
  • 1 044 messages

Mikka-chan wrote...

Denying someone else's sexuality is a horrible thing to do. There isn't any difference between telling an asexual person they can't really be asexual because they have 'hormones' or telling a lesbian that she doesn't really like girls, she just hasn't found the right guy yet. Or telling a transexual that despite how their brain and body works, they really aren't the gender they feel themselves to be, because it's wrong or weird.

Is that really the hill you want to stand on? That my sexuality doesn't really exist, despite having never felt aroused, feeling no desire to have sex (or even kiss, for that matter, although I find hugs somewhat comforting), and being able to stare at naked attractive bodies of both genders without feeling anything besides, occasionally, uncomfortable?

I think that's apretty ignorant hill to stand on. There are quite a few studies on asexuality: hell, wikipedia has names of what, twenty some? Where are these studies that 'prove' their is no asexuality (preferably having been done in, say, the last twenty or so years by a University or group that isn't crazy)?

HERE WE GO
There is a huge difference between Asexuality and gay/Transexuality as it was originally used to describe asexual reproduction and was later adapted to describe people who apparently have no Hormones. It's without hormone which both gays and Transexuals still have. Completley diffrent subject matter.
And your history in sexuality is just some random story on the internet to me. Wikipedia on the otherhand has sources that can be dictated as opinion and for every study thats says sexuality is real there is one that says it isn't. If it is a sexual orrientation it is extremley rare and not normal in humans and likley a genetic mutation/disorder or chemical imbalance in the brain. It is not an sexual Orientation because it would actually be the lack of Sexual Orientation.

Humans are natrually Sexual beings, Asexuality is not normally part of our programming. There's nothing wrong with thinking your Asexual or being Asexual. It's just not a Orientation. It's something in a whole different category.

#6166
RVonE

RVonE
  • Members
  • 433 messages

My Avatar is a Lizard wrote...

Mikka-chan wrote...

Denying someone else's sexuality is a horrible thing to do. There isn't any difference between telling an asexual person they can't really be asexual because they have 'hormones' or telling a lesbian that she doesn't really like girls, she just hasn't found the right guy yet. Or telling a transexual that despite how their brain and body works, they really aren't the gender they feel themselves to be, because it's wrong or weird.

Is that really the hill you want to stand on? That my sexuality doesn't really exist, despite having never felt aroused, feeling no desire to have sex (or even kiss, for that matter, although I find hugs somewhat comforting), and being able to stare at naked attractive bodies of both genders without feeling anything besides, occasionally, uncomfortable?

I think that's apretty ignorant hill to stand on. There are quite a few studies on asexuality: hell, wikipedia has names of what, twenty some? Where are these studies that 'prove' their is no asexuality (preferably having been done in, say, the last twenty or so years by a University or group that isn't crazy)?

HERE WE GO
There is a huge difference between Asexuality and gay/Transexuality as it was originally used to describe asexual reproduction and was later adapted to describe people who apparently have no Hormones. It's without hormone which both gays and Transexuals still have. Completley diffrent subject matter.
And your history in sexuality is just some random story on the internet to me. Wikipedia on the otherhand has sources that can be dictated as opinion and for every study thats says sexuality is real there is one that says it isn't. If it is a sexual orrientation it is extremley rare and not normal in humans and likley a genetic mutation/disorder or chemical imbalance in the brain. It is not an sexual Orientation because it would actually be the lack of Sexual Orientation.

Humans are natrually Sexual beings, Asexuality is not normally part of our programming. There's nothing wrong with thinking your Asexual or being Asexual. It's just not a Orientation. It's something in a whole different category.


This debate is useless without some actual sources backing up the claims made. Also, as has been observed by others, this is hardly the place for such an exchange.

#6167
koshiee

koshiee
  • Members
  • 312 messages
back to important information.
Who are the bi characters? Isabella ......????????
What's the current popular theory?

#6168
lilliful

lilliful
  • Members
  • 593 messages

koshiee wrote...

back to important information.
Who are the bi characters? Isabella ......????????
What's the current popular theory?

Anders seems the most likely if there are only two bisexual options.

#6169
mesmerizedish

mesmerizedish
  • Members
  • 7 776 messages

lilliful wrote...

koshiee wrote...

back to important information.
Who are the bi characters? Isabella ......????????
What's the current popular theory?

Anders seems the most likely if there are only two bisexual options.


Which there aren't. Because they're all bi.

#6170
nelly21

nelly21
  • Members
  • 1 247 messages

lilliful wrote...

koshiee wrote...

back to important information.
Who are the bi characters? Isabella ......????????
What's the current popular theory?

Anders seems the most likely if there are only two bisexual options.


Making Anders bisexual would be stupid since he's a ladies' man in Awakening. My money is on Fenris.

#6171
Ryzaki

Ryzaki
  • Members
  • 34 424 messages

nelly21 wrote...

lilliful wrote...

koshiee wrote...

back to important information.
Who are the bi characters? Isabella ......????????
What's the current popular theory?

Anders seems the most likely if there are only two bisexual options.


Making Anders bisexual would be stupid since he's a ladies' man in Awakening. My money is on Fenris.


It's Anders. 

<3  
If hit on by a male PC he responds favorably. 

He's also one of the party members a male PC can "bone". 

Modifié par Ryzaki, 04 mars 2011 - 12:49 .


#6172
purplerose1414

purplerose1414
  • Members
  • 10 messages

nelly21 wrote...

lilliful wrote...

koshiee wrote...

back to important information.
Who are the bi characters? Isabella ......????????
What's the current popular theory?

Anders seems the most likely if there are only two bisexual options.


Making Anders bisexual would be stupid since he's a ladies' man in Awakening. My money is on Fenris.


Yes, but in DA2 we have an unreliable narrator, which means there's some leeway in characterization. Meta answer being it's a different writer for him this time around. Not to mention at the very least Anders flirting with Mhawk has already been confirmed.

#6173
Taleroth

Taleroth
  • Members
  • 9 136 messages
My bet is on whatever causes Ms. Ryzaki the most distress.

Modifié par Taleroth, 04 mars 2011 - 12:50 .


#6174
Ryzaki

Ryzaki
  • Members
  • 34 424 messages

Taleroth wrote...

My bet is on whatever causes Ms. Ryzaki the most distress.


*drop kicks*

It better be Anders! 

Or...Or...

*bursts into tears* 

Edit: not seriously just in case someone thought that. 

I just hope it is Anders. 
^_^

Modifié par Ryzaki, 04 mars 2011 - 01:04 .


#6175
mesmerizedish

mesmerizedish
  • Members
  • 7 776 messages

Taleroth wrote...

My bet is on whatever causes Ms. Ryzaki the most distress.


That would be them all being bi, because she'd have to wear an "ish was RIGHT" banner.