6813 réponses à ce sujet

[Sabariel]

Gill Kaiser wrote...

errant_knight wrote...

I think I'll forgo trying to explain why incest is both taboo and deeply creepy, as well as the damage it does to those involved. If I have to explain, I don't think there's much point.

Censensual incest without reproduction hurts nobody, actually.

Ah yes, "incest". We have dismissed that claim.

[Skilled Seeker]

JrayM16 wrote...

Skilled Seeker wrote...

Leliana hit on Morrigan too. That was most entertaining.

Don't forget Morrigan hitting on Sten.  That was my favorite.

Ah yes, that was hilarious!

[Shepard Lives]

In keeping with the Anders story, this thread has become an abomination.

[lilliful]

JrayM16 wrote...

Skilled Seeker wrote...

Leliana hit on Morrigan too. That was most entertaining.

Don't forget Morrigan hitting on Sten.  That was my favorite.

That was PRICELESS. Sten was like the Worf of DA:O.

[Maugrim]

Shepard Lives wrote...

In keeping with the Anders story, this thread has become an abomination.

*Sends off for authorization for the Right of Annulment.*

[Ryzaki]

JrayM16 wrote...

Ryzaki wrote...

I'm fine with consensual incest between two adults. Frankly I don't think that's any of anyone else's business. People just insist on being the morality police for some reason /shrugs

But I also respect the devs wishes not to write such a relationship.
As for killing kids some of those little bastards deserve it. *mutters about Fallouts money stealing little bastards* 

If the sex doesn't produce children, then fine, that's cool, none of my business.  But children out of incest can have a lot of genetic disorders.  That's my opinion anyhow.

And some kids DO deserve it. 

I don't agree about the producing children bit. I have genetic trait that is pretty common in my family. If I have a child with the wrong person (who has a trait as well and not the full disease) the chance of my child having a full blown disease is extremly high. Does this mean people should dictate who I choose to have kids with? No it doesn't. As long as no child abuse is going on it really isn't anyone else's business. No matter how strange it is. 

[Skilled Seeker]

One step at a time Ryzaki, one step at a time. Wait for incest to be accepted first

[lilliful]

makenzieshepard wrote...

Shepard Lives wrote...

In keeping with the Anders story, this thread has become an abomination.

*Sends off for authorization for the Right of Annulment.*

[JrayM16]

Ryzaki wrote...

JrayM16 wrote...

Ryzaki wrote...

I'm fine with consensual incest between two adults. Frankly I don't think that's any of anyone else's business. People just insist on being the morality police for some reason /shrugs

But I also respect the devs wishes not to write such a relationship.
As for killing kids some of those little bastards deserve it. *mutters about Fallouts money stealing little bastards* 

If the sex doesn't produce children, then fine, that's cool, none of my business.  But children out of incest can have a lot of genetic disorders.  That's my opinion anyhow.

And some kids DO deserve it. 

I don't agree about the producing children bit. I have genetic trait that is pretty common in my family. If I have a child with the wrong person (who has a trait as well and not the full disease) the chance of my child having a full blown disease is extremly high. Does this mean people should dictate who I choose to have kids with? No it doesn't. As long as no child abuse is going on it really isn't anyone else's business. No matter how strange it is. 

I don't know, I feel like kids being born with genetic disorders because of a situation where it is likely to happen is not good.  I agree with you in principle, that people shouldn't dictate who has kids with who.  But I just don't think it behooves anyone to produce children knowing full well that they could be disabled in some way.  To me, that's just a reckless attitude.

[Ryzaki]

Skilled Seeker wrote...

One step at a time Ryzaki, one step at a time. Wait for incest to be accepted first

I don't really care what's accepted or not. I just believe in people minding their business. 

[Ryzaki]

JrayM16 wrote..
I don't know, I feel like kids being born with genetic disorders because of a situation where it is likely to happen is not good.  I agree with you in principle, that people shouldn't dictate who has kids with who.  But I just don't think it behooves anyone to produce children knowing full well that they could be disabled in some way.  To me, that's just a reckless attitude.

/shrugs

I don't expect to be met with agreement. Just stating what I think. 

[Elsariel]

lilliful wrote...

In other news, has anybody thought about how odd it might be to have competition? Like, if I was a manly manhawke, and Isabela was hitting on Carver in the party banter? Or worse, Carver hitting on manhawke's woman? I'm excited to see this happen, hahaha. My hawke never would have taken it seriously if it was just any companion, but dude, that's my brother!

Yes!  I totally want competition in-game for my LI.  It doesn't even have to be a companion character.  This This This!

[JrayM16]

Skilled Seeker wrote...

One step at a time Ryzaki, one step at a time. Wait for incest to be accepted first

And that's the tricky part.  It's probably nigh impossible for incest to be allowed without making incest-based children allowed as well.  Cause if incest is accepted, then everyone's just gonna be like, "Well, why can't we have children?"  It's a tricky thing.  That decreases the chances of incest being accepted exponentially.

[JrayM16]

Ryzaki wrote...

JrayM16 wrote..
I don't know, I feel like kids being born with genetic disorders because of a situation where it is likely to happen is not good.  I agree with you in principle, that people shouldn't dictate who has kids with who.  But I just don't think it behooves anyone to produce children knowing full well that they could be disabled in some way.  To me, that's just a reckless attitude.

/shrugs

I don't expect to be met with agreement. Just stating what I think. 

Very true.  As am I.

/tips hat

[Curlain]

Elsariel wrote...

lilliful wrote...

In other news, has anybody thought about how odd it might be to have competition? Like, if I was a manly manhawke, and Isabela was hitting on Carver in the party banter? Or worse, Carver hitting on manhawke's woman? I'm excited to see this happen, hahaha. My hawke never would have taken it seriously if it was just any companion, but dude, that's my brother!

Yes!  I totally want competition in-game for my LI.  It doesn't even have to be a companion character.  This This This!

Will I be able to duel for them, that could be kinda cool (though depending on the LI attitude it could backfire on you)

[Ryzaki]

JrayM16 wrote...

Skilled Seeker wrote...

One step at a time Ryzaki, one step at a time. Wait for incest to be accepted first

And that's the tricky part.  It's probably nigh impossible for incest to be allowed without making incest-based children allowed as well.  Cause if incest is accepted, then everyone's just gonna be like, "Well, why can't we have children?"  It's a tricky thing.  That decreases the chances of incest being accepted exponentially.

Except of course there's nothing stopping said people from having kids in the first place. 

[Jessihatt]

Mash Mashington wrote...

CommanderJessica wrote...

Maelora wrote...

lots of fans are cool with murdering kids but would never accept brother-sister love.  Funny morals there.

I'd rather kill a child than sleep with my brother..

what is this i don't even

I interpreted that as saying it's more socially acceptable to commit incest than kill someone, perhaps it is, actually it probably is, just saying if I was forced at gunpoint I'd be less repulsed to kill someone, but that's just me 

Anyways, I'm delighted with the LI options as it is, even if we weren't related to Bethany and Carver :happy:

[Elsariel]

Curlain wrote...

Elsariel wrote...

lilliful wrote...

In other news, has anybody thought about how odd it might be to have competition? Like, if I was a manly manhawke, and Isabela was hitting on Carver in the party banter? Or worse, Carver hitting on manhawke's woman? I'm excited to see this happen, hahaha. My hawke never would have taken it seriously if it was just any companion, but dude, that's my brother!

Yes!  I totally want competition in-game for my LI.  It doesn't even have to be a companion character.  This This This!

Will I be able to duel for them, that could be kinda cool (though depending on the LI attitude it could backfire on you)

Sure, why not?  And having it backfire on you makes the whole interaction that much more interesting, don't you think? 

[Skilled Seeker]

Curlain wrote...

Elsariel wrote...

lilliful wrote...

In other news, has anybody thought about how odd it might be to have competition? Like, if I was a manly manhawke, and Isabela was hitting on Carver in the party banter? Or worse, Carver hitting on manhawke's woman? I'm excited to see this happen, hahaha. My hawke never would have taken it seriously if it was just any companion, but dude, that's my brother!

Yes!  I totally want competition in-game for my LI.  It doesn't even have to be a companion character.  This This This!

Will I be able to duel for them, that could be kinda cool (though depending on the LI attitude it could backfire on you)

Duel? Bah. A magical curse or drop of poison is a much more effective method of eliminating adversaries

[JrayM16]

Ryzaki wrote...

JrayM16 wrote...

Skilled Seeker wrote...

One step at a time Ryzaki, one step at a time. Wait for incest to be accepted first

And that's the tricky part.  It's probably nigh impossible for incest to be allowed without making incest-based children allowed as well.  Cause if incest is accepted, then everyone's just gonna be like, "Well, why can't we have children?"  It's a tricky thing.  That decreases the chances of incest being accepted exponentially.

Except of course there's nothing stopping said people from having kids in the first place. 

Well there's always that.  There's also nothing stopping people from incest either.  Or pretty much any private sexual activity that is largely looked down on.  This is purely a hypothetical acceptance scenario.

[lilliful]

So, in other non-incest-bannination-related news, do you think manhawke will be topping in the m/m samesex romance custcene? I remember if you were a male elf warden, you got the same cutscene as the women with Zevran, but you topped if you were human. However, Fenris is now equal height to manhawke. Or... hope beyond hope... do you think we'll get more than one cutscene? I mean, 10 years is a long time. If it's Fenris, I hope he tops. If it's Anders, I home mhawke does.

Modifié par lilliful, 17 février 2011 - 10:23 .

[Skilled Seeker]

CommanderJessica wrote...

Mash Mashington wrote...

CommanderJessica wrote...

Maelora wrote...

lots of fans are cool with murdering kids but would never accept brother-sister love.  Funny morals there.

I'd rather kill a child than sleep with my brother..

what is this i don't even

I interpreted that as saying it's more socially acceptable to commit incest than kill someone, perhaps it is, actually it probably is, just saying if I was forced at gunpoint I'd be less repulsed to kill someone, but that's just me 

Anyways, I'm delighted with the LI options as it is, even if we weren't related to Bethany and Carver :happy:

Read the original post again. You just proved her point, she was saying killing children is more socially acceptable than incest and overall that is true.

[Elsariel]

lilliful wrote...

So, in other non-incest-bannination-related news, do you think manhawke will be topping in the m/m samesex romance custcene? I remember if you were a male elf warden, you got the same cutscene as the women with Zevran, but you topped if you were human. However, Fenris is now equal height to manhawke. Or... hope beyond hope... do you think we'll get more than one cutscene? I mean, 10 years is a long time. If it's Fenris, I hope he tops. If it's Anders, I home mhawke does.

Are we certain we're still having those kinds of cutscene's in-game?  I thought I heard it was not to be.....?