223 réponses à ce sujet

[Nefla]

Isabella. As a woman I have no use for some random hussy who slept with my entire party after a 10 second conversation in Origins and who has come back looking even ****tier. No thanks.

[Ryzaki]

Anders.



He's a abomination.

[silentassassin264]

While I am not looking forward to offing the teammates, If I need to sacrifice someone a la Jade Empire to get ultimate power, all those who stand in my way will have to fall. I will feel bad for them for what it is worth.

[Deviija]

I don't know enough about any of them, nor have played the game, so I have little to base an informed opinion.

[fredward55]

Fenris

[Felfenix]

Merrill or Aveline. I'll have to see them in-game to really know which.

Aveline... because there's only room for one female warrior in my party. Also, she doesn't seem like a very fun or especially interesting person.

Merrill... because the new story gave me a bad impression of her. She'll bore me at best, and annoy me at worst. A lot of people are into that kinda character/storytelling, but not me.

Modifié par Felfenix, 15 février 2011 - 06:03 .

[atheelogos]

Ryzaki wrote...

Anders.

He's a abomination.

No he's not.

[HighlandBerserkr]

I am happy to see not as many Aveline hatrers as I thought I would, and I have been watching Aveline very closely and I can bet pretty safely that she will be one of everyones favorites once the game is done.

[ThatDancingTurian]

UndercoverDoctor wrote...

Varric.

Create a paradox.

I actually like Varric, but I would so pick him just to see what it looks like when you divide by zero.

[HTTP 404]

probably the siblings. Only room for one hawke

[LPPrince]

 This is a question better suited for AFTER the game has come out and a large amount of the community has beaten the game.

We don't even have the demo yet.

[HTTP 404]

LPPrince wrote...

 This is a question better suited for AFTER the game has come out and a large amount of the community has beaten the game.

We don't even have the demo yet.

come on now, everyone here on the forums are prescient and all knowing.

[mellifera]

Glaucon wrote...

LPPrince wrote...

 This is a question better suited for AFTER the game has come out and a large amount of the community has beaten the game.

We don't even have the demo yet.

No, I can and have answered the question without knowing a thing about them and lots about me.  What does the number of players completing the game have to do with it?  It ill be an entirely subjective matter.

So you feel comfortable killing someone you know nothing about for no particular reason?

[LPPrince]

Glaucon wrote...

LPPrince wrote...

 This is a question better suited for AFTER the game has come out and a large amount of the community has beaten the game.

We don't even have the demo yet.

No, I can and have answered the question without knowing a thing about them and lots about me.  What does the number of players completing the game have to do with it?  It ill be an entirely subjective matter.

It'll be an subjective matter with an uninformed opinion that doesn't really make any sense.

Modifié par LPPrince, 15 février 2011 - 06:52 .

[Jimmy Fury]

yukidama wrote...

Glaucon wrote...

LPPrince wrote...

 This is a question better suited for AFTER the game has come out and a large amount of the community has beaten the game.

We don't even have the demo yet.

No, I can and have answered the question without knowing a thing about them and lots about me.  What does the number of players completing the game have to do with it?  It ill be an entirely subjective matter.

So you feel comfortable killing someone you know nothing about for no particular reason?

1: Why not? You know nothing about them therefore there's no reason to be upset by their death.
2: You do know this is fiction right?

[HTTP 404]

yukidama wrote...

Glaucon wrote...

LPPrince wrote...

 This is a question better suited for AFTER the game has come out and a large amount of the community has beaten the game.

We don't even have the demo yet.

No, I can and have answered the question without knowing a thing about them and lots about me.  What does the number of players completing the game have to do with it?  It ill be an entirely subjective matter.

So you feel comfortable killing someone you know nothing about for no particular reason?

haha, is it far better to get to know someone before you kill them off?

To LP prince: a uninformed opinion is a true opinion otherwise an informed person will make a biased opinion.

Modifié par HTTP 404, 15 février 2011 - 06:54 .

[RosaAquafire]

I never kill characters unless it's IC. and I don't know my Hawke yet, or the situation. Or the companions, really.

My least favourite in DA:O was Sten, but I would never leave him in Lothering JUST TO SEE THE DARKSPAWN SWARM HIM.

[IamLoreYayaya]

Right now all we know about the characters is their backstory maybe a slight bit of their personality and the rest is speculation. Hardly enough to make an informed decision.

[LPPrince]

So let me get this straight- (lets assume you are a vigilante who kills bad guys)



Situation A- Two random bank robbers rob a bank. You can only kill one. You kill robber #1 because he's there. Robber B gets away.



Situation B- Two random bank robbers rob a bank. You find out that #1 is actually an undercover cop who's on a mission to bring down a whole group of bank robbers. Robber #2 is just another bank robber. You gonna kill #1 or #2?



Because an informed opinion is a BETTER opinion.

[Jimmy Fury]

LPPrince wrote...

So let me get this straight- (lets assume you are a vigilante who kills bad guys)

Situation A- Two random bank robbers rob a bank. You can only kill one. You kill robber #1 because he's there. Robber B gets away.

Situation B- Two random bank robbers rob a bank. You find out that #1 is actually an undercover cop who's on a mission to bring down a whole group of bank robbers. Robber #2 is just another bank robber. You gonna kill #1 or #2?

Because an informed opinion is a BETTER opinion.

My assorted heathen gods you are taking a light hearted thread WAY too seriously.

Chill. It's all in good fun.

[HTTP 404]

LPPrince wrote...

So let me get this straight- (lets assume you are a vigilante who kills bad guys)

Situation A- Two random bank robbers rob a bank. You can only kill one. You kill robber #1 because he's there. Robber B gets away.

Situation B- Two random bank robbers rob a bank. You find out that #1 is actually an undercover cop who's on a mission to bring down a whole group of bank robbers. Robber #2 is just another bank robber. You gonna kill #1 or #2?

Because an informed opinion is a BETTER opinion.

now Im biased to think that robber 1's life is far better than robber #2 when clearly Robber #2 could be forced into a situation where a international criminal kidnapped his kids and told him to rob this bank or he will never see them again!  Worse yet, the undercover cop is crooked!  How could you possibly know everything?

An "informed" opinion leads to a biased decision!

btw Im messin with you

Modifié par HTTP 404, 15 février 2011 - 07:11 .

[LPPrince]

Jimmy Fury wrote...
My assorted heathen gods you are taking a light hearted thread WAY too seriously.

Chill. It's all in good fun.

I'm relaxed. I'm just saying it doesn't make much sense to ask this now. At least to me it doesn't.

[IanPolaris]

atheelogos wrote...

Ryzaki wrote...

Anders.

He's a abomination.

No he's not.

Demonic spirit? Check
Living in mage's body? Check
Can control mage?  Check

Yep, it's an abomination alright.

-Polaris