Modifié par slingara, 16 février 2011 - 05:47 .
Modifié par SSV Enterprise, 15 février 2011 - 05:36 .
Modifié par slingara, 16 février 2011 - 05:42 .
SSV Enterprise wrote...
There's no such thing as a Core i3 M 350 single core. Intel practically doesn't make single-core machines anymore except for bargain-bin, $200 computers running on half a decade old processors. So your problem is definitely unrelated to single-core issues.
.
He probably looked it up there. Because the blasted tools won't recognize my 6 cores either. So i guess the game doesn't recognize either and won't get past the "press any key" screen. I'll have to try that MassAffinity thing thou, that's the only thing left to try.Modifié par Catscratcher, 16 février 2011 - 01:28 .
Modifié par Gorath Alpha, 17 février 2011 - 05:04 .
Catscratcher wrote...
SSV Enterprise wrote...
There's no such thing as a Core i3 M 350 single core. Intel practically doesn't make single-core machines anymore except for bargain-bin, $200 computers running on half a decade old processors. So your problem is definitely unrelated to single-core issues.
.
Mass Effect 1 2 and DA:Origins have a config utility you know
I wish they had better coding. I used to play this with a dual core. How can you limit a game to a specific cpu range ? I think they were actually meaning to lock this game to dual cores. That's probably why It generate mountains of problems. I hope they hired better coders for ME3.
Modifié par IBPROFEN, 17 février 2011 - 05:12 .
Modifié par slingara, 17 février 2011 - 06:29 .
Exactly as already surmised a day ago (23 hours, OK almost a day), the author was avoiding telling the whole story until now. And Sandy Bridge isn't even available for laptops yet. Not until late March or early April.Gorath Alpha wrote...
Video Card = 256 MB (with Pixel Shader 3.0 support). Supported GPU Chips: NVIDIA GeForce 6800 or greater; ATI Radeon X1600 Pro or greater. Please note that NVIDIA GeForce G.210, 310, 7100, 7200, 7300, 7400, 7500, 8100, 8200, 8300, 8400, 9100, 9200, and 9300; ATI Radeon X1300, X1550, HD 2400, 3100, 3200, HD 3450, HD 3470, HD 4200, HD 4250, HD 4350, and (probably) HD 5450 are below minimum system requirements. Updates to your video and sound card drivers may be required. Intel and S3 video devices are not officially supported in Mass Effect 2.
I feel somewhat doubtful that the author has the "problem" complained about in his OP here. my suspicion is, it's much more likely to be related to trying to ignore the minimum video CARD requirement. Intel tried just once to sell a real graphics card and failed, miserably. All they make now are variations on a Chipset video chip. The i3 / i5 / i7 Core multi-core CPUs had a piggy-backed chip, the same one usually included in an Intel Chipset, inside the package with the processor cores.
When they get their problems with SATA defects corrected in the new chipset for Sandy Bridge, it is still the same basic level of business graphics, not Mainline Gaming quality at all, that is now supposed to be a fully integrated into the design. However, all that means is that after trailing behind the IGPs from AMD for 3-5 years, Intel finally caught up with Radeon 4200 / 4250 onboard Chipset video chips (the nVIDIA IGPs having been slower, the current piggybacked chip had already caught up to those).
P. S. I did not intend to leave the impression that either AMD or nVIDIA are at all likely to stand still long enough for Intel's Sandy Bridge video to have anything meaningful to do. The newest Radeon advance is an APU, combined from the 5n00 generation Mobile card designs and the latest CPU designs, integrated together. It is named Fusion, like the Ford automobile model, and is late getting to market because the two chip fabricators AMD contracts with are both delayed getting new fabs on line for new dies thinner than 40 nm thick, and the Radeon 6n00 generation was designed with 32 nm as its target, as were the Fusion APUs.
IBPROFEN wrote...
I play it with Quad Core look in sig area for my computer spec. I haven't had a bit of problems from my rig,
Modifié par Gorath Alpha, 17 février 2011 - 05:59 .
Gorath Alpha wrote...
Exactly as already surmised a day ago (23 hours, OK almost a day), the author was avoiding telling the whole story until now. And Sandy Bridge isn't even available for laptops yet. Not until late March or early April.Gorath Alpha wrote...
Video Card = 256 MB (with Pixel Shader 3.0 support). Supported GPU Chips: NVIDIA GeForce 6800 or greater; ATI Radeon X1600 Pro or greater. Please note that NVIDIA GeForce G.210, 310, 7100, 7200, 7300, 7400, 7500, 8100, 8200, 8300, 8400, 9100, 9200, and 9300; ATI Radeon X1300, X1550, HD 2400, 3100, 3200, HD 3450, HD 3470, HD 4200, HD 4250, HD 4350, and (probably) HD 5450 are below minimum system requirements. Updates to your video and sound card drivers may be required. Intel and S3 video devices are not officially supported in Mass Effect 2.
I feel somewhat doubtful that the author has the "problem" complained about in his OP here. my suspicion is, it's much more likely to be related to trying to ignore the minimum video CARD requirement. Intel tried just once to sell a real graphics card and failed, miserably. All they make now are variations on a Chipset video chip. The i3 / i5 / i7 Core multi-core CPUs had a piggy-backed chip, the same one usually included in an Intel Chipset, inside the package with the processor cores.
When they get their problems with SATA defects corrected in the new chipset for Sandy Bridge, it is still the same basic level of business graphics, not Mainline Gaming quality at all, that is now supposed to be a fully integrated into the design. However, all that means is that after trailing behind the IGPs from AMD for 3-5 years, Intel finally caught up with Radeon 4200 / 4250 onboard Chipset video chips (the nVIDIA IGPs having been slower, the current piggybacked chip had already caught up to those).
P. S. I did not intend to leave the impression that either AMD or nVIDIA are at all likely to stand still long enough for Intel's Sandy Bridge video to have anything meaningful to do. The newest Radeon advance is an APU, combined from the 5n00 generation Mobile card designs and the latest CPU designs, integrated together. It is named Fusion, like the Ford automobile model, and is late getting to market because the two chip fabricators AMD contracts with are both delayed getting new fabs on line for new dies thinner than 40 nm thick, and the Radeon 6n00 generation was designed with 32 nm as its target, as were the Fusion APUs.
Catscratcher wrote...
IBPROFEN wrote...
I play it with Quad Core look in sig area for my computer spec. I haven't had a bit of problems from my rig,
And I played it with a dual core. Still it doesn't change the fact i can't play the game. Or ton of others having issues. When you can play other games without issues and can't play specific ones, it's usually game's fault. Since i can run WoW without any issues (it's a problematic game itself) i'm done doing troubleshooting and shelf the game. Pity.
IBPROFEN wrote...
Catscratcher wrote...
IBPROFEN wrote...
I play it with Quad Core look in sig area for my computer spec. I haven't had a bit of problems from my rig,
And I played it with a dual core. Still it doesn't change the fact i can't play the game. Or ton of others having issues. When you can play other games without issues and can't play specific ones, it's usually game's fault. Since i can run WoW without any issues (it's a problematic game itself) i'm done doing troubleshooting and shelf the game. Pity.
I had a dual core before I upgraded to quad, and still didn't have any trouble playing. How about listing specs of your computer.
Retour en haut