Realm of DA vs forgotten realms.
#1
Posté 14 novembre 2009 - 05:14
Although i know that they will proboly build more into the world of da but i would really like to see more divinity and more magic sources then just "the fade". It would be fun if in a coming da game they would make their own version of forgotten realms "times of trouble" with avatar of gods popping up all over the world imo.
Thought i know that my opinion is moslty the very minority so i am intrested on what you think is missing in the DA world, and if it is better then forgotten realms..?
#2
Posté 14 novembre 2009 - 05:17
Also the gods being just like mortals but more powerful is pretty lame..
#3
Posté 14 novembre 2009 - 05:33
#4
Posté 14 novembre 2009 - 05:35
#5
Posté 14 novembre 2009 - 05:41
#6
Posté 14 novembre 2009 - 05:41
but being an unkillable godlike person who wakes up is ok !! ROFL
#7
Posté 14 novembre 2009 - 05:43
If not, feel free to use Google.
Modifié par Zenthar Aseth, 14 novembre 2009 - 05:43 .
#8
Posté 14 novembre 2009 - 05:53
However
Dragon Age: Origins is better when you see it from the viewpoint of a single computer game.
Im looking forward to expansion's allowing you to visit the familar and the as of yet not seen locations around the world.
#9
Posté 14 novembre 2009 - 05:58
Now as for comparing each other, they both have an impressive lore. Forgotten realm has the advantage of having been around a lot longer so it has more lore. I actually liked a lot the gods idea in FR. It involved them much more in the world than in DA but when they made DA the plan seemed to be like the gods have left everyone.
But you cant really compare 2 really good thing.
#10
Posté 14 novembre 2009 - 06:02
#11
Posté 14 novembre 2009 - 06:04
#12
Posté 14 novembre 2009 - 06:04
Zenthar Aseth wrote...
I am calm. Why would I not be?
You are coming off as a complete arsehat.
Just saying.....
Modifié par Stronghold II, 14 novembre 2009 - 06:06 .
#13
Posté 14 novembre 2009 - 06:05
I like DA's world because it is new, but has a fairly detailed past. There's quite a bit that can (and I hope will be!) done with it. I am eager to get ahold of the RPG source materials just for lore, basically.
Also, I prefer low magic worlds. DA actually has more magic than I would have liked in a story, but I realize that for a computer game, it's got about as little as you can possibly have =)
#14
Posté 14 novembre 2009 - 06:07
Zenthar Aseth wrote...
I am calm. Why would I not be?
All the elipses make it seem like you have some pent up anger broiling just beneath the surface.
#15
Posté 14 novembre 2009 - 06:07
That is what you call good lore, and that is why DA's lore is 1000X more interesting, even if forgotten realms had more. Quality > Quantity.
#16
Posté 14 novembre 2009 - 06:08
Stronghold II wrote...
Zenthar Aseth wrote...
I am calm. Why would I not be?
You are coming off as a complete arsehat.
Just saying.....
Only if you try to refute something I said with "um.. there is revival.. but there's not" or "AHHA OMG I USE SARCASMS!!"
#17
Posté 14 novembre 2009 - 06:11
Zenthar Aseth wrote...
Stronghold II wrote...
Zenthar Aseth wrote...
I am calm. Why would I not be?
You are coming off as a complete arsehat.
Just saying.....
Only if you try to refute something I said with "um.. there is revival.. but there's not" or "AHHA OMG I USE SARCASMS!!"
You need a hug, and possibly medication.
#18
Posté 14 novembre 2009 - 06:14
However, I'm vastly more interestedi n Orlais. The culture there sounds so much more interesting, and we've only barely tapped what it is that goes on there.
#19
Posté 14 novembre 2009 - 06:15
Stronghold II wrote...
Zenthar Aseth wrote...
Stronghold II wrote...
Zenthar Aseth wrote...
I am calm. Why would I not be?
You are coming off as a complete arsehat.
Just saying.....
Only if you try to refute something I said with "um.. there is revival.. but there's not" or "AHHA OMG I USE SARCASMS!!"
You need a hug, and possibly medication.
Alright, troll spotted. No need for our conversation to go any further.
#20
Posté 14 novembre 2009 - 06:16
Zenthar Aseth wrote...
Stronghold II wrote...
Zenthar Aseth wrote...
Stronghold II wrote...
Zenthar Aseth wrote...
I am calm. Why would I not be?
You are coming off as a complete arsehat.
Just saying.....
Only if you try to refute something I said with "um.. there is revival.. but there's not" or "AHHA OMG I USE SARCASMS!!"
You need a hug, and possibly medication.
Alright, troll spotted. No need for our conversation to go any further.
You're an arse, and that makes me a troll?
/hug
#21
Posté 14 novembre 2009 - 06:16
As it goes for DA world. I like it. I like the politics in it, the race relationships, and keep in mind we only really got to know one little part of it so far with rest only hinted here and there, its something fresh among all the fantasy worlds presented lately and i hope it will continue to develop keeping up to the promises it gives in DA:O
#22
Posté 14 novembre 2009 - 06:17
But I think they tried to make the world in DAO less fantasy and as real as it could get.
But as mentioned you cannot really compare the Forgotten Realms with DAO, since it has been there so much more and many of the best authors have been contribution to it over the years.
However, I still think they did a good job inventing 5000 years of history, without using the Forgotten Realms world as a easy template to start with. We still have the vast majority of the details lacking, hopefully we will discover them over the years to come with expansions.
And by the way, the whole ressurection argument is silly. The mechanism is the same, your party members "fall in combat" and they can be resurrected during and after battle. Only difference is in Baldur's your main character can never "fall" in battle and your party members can be dismembers, incinerated and so forth so you cannot resurrect them.
Modifié par Netrin, 14 novembre 2009 - 06:23 .
#23
Posté 14 novembre 2009 - 06:18
...that said, I am enjoying Fereldan/Thedas alot. It seemed a little... bland at first, like others noted. It just didn't seem that different from other settings, but as I get further into the game and see more of it, it's a very well thought out, well executed and subtle reinvention of many fantasy conventions and standbys.
I haven't played tabletop RPGs in years, but I'd honestly rather give the Dragon Age one a shot before I'd play DnD again.
#24
Posté 14 novembre 2009 - 06:19
Zenthar Aseth wrote...
Also the gods being just like mortals but more powerful is pretty lame..
I much prefer that to a vague all powerful presense. Greek mythology was always much more interesting than the Christian mythology.
#25
Posté 14 novembre 2009 - 06:20
Besides, because of licensing issues, there are far more inconveniences to D&D lore than advantages in a game like Dragon age.
Some fresh air is much needed, and welcome, as far as I'm concerned
Modifié par Nissa_Red, 14 novembre 2009 - 06:23 .





Retour en haut






