Quole wrote...
Why is that?` The Fall of Reach` and `First Strike` were good.Valikdu wrote...
Haven't read anything by this author besides "The Flood". Therefore, can't give any opinions. Writing a book on Halo would be like writing a book on Jaws 4, it's inherently bad.
Ever heard of `Warhammer 40k: Firewarrior?` That was a book based off a game with even less of a story than Halo in yet the book was great.
Don't worry about it. A lot of people troll against Halo because it is the cool thing to do. "Ghosts of Onyx" was better than any of the recent Mass Effect stuff that has come out, and TFOR was even better than Onyx.
That said, Flood is an absolutely terrible book that could have been soooo much better (but still not good) had they not given the first draft to a drunken monkey who then sent it directly to printing after skimming the last 3 pages...... The point I am making is that obviously Dietz was pushed to churn out a book after the success of "The Fall of Reach" by Nylund. The book would have been bearable had any editors actually read the damn thing and fixed a lot of easy mistakes.
Let's hope that he has more than a weekend to write the Mass Effect book.





Retour en haut







