Is there any reason NOT to play a mage?
#126
Posté 19 février 2011 - 11:06
In the age of swords if you are using magic and some kind of bow you are a sissy because you aren't man or woman enough to face your opponent and watch him/her die in front of you.
#127
Posté 20 février 2011 - 02:58
kjdhgfiliuhwe wrote...
LobselVith8 wrote...
Threeparts wrote...
Behold, the awesome power of Breasts.
Considering Bethany is Hawke's sister...
But, the player sitting in that chair isn't. C'mon. Are you so naive that you don't get this?
Anyways, if we do get a toolset (anyone know if we are; it's troubling that it hasn't seemed to be announced), I imagine the forced choice between the two siblings will be one of the first things modded.
It's existentialism, not naivety.
#128
Posté 20 février 2011 - 03:15
But I don't think EVERYONE and their mother should be a Mage, especially if it's not their area of expertise, or personal preference.
#129
Posté 20 février 2011 - 03:29
Virginian wrote...
This is my stance on it: Mages & rogue archers are sissies.
In the age of swords if you are using magic and some kind of bow you are a sissy because you aren't man or woman enough to face your opponent and watch him/her die in front of you.
Wow haha. Just wow.
#130
Posté 20 février 2011 - 03:38
#131
Posté 20 février 2011 - 03:53
Lol j/k...
Not really.
Modifié par Eclipse_9990, 20 février 2011 - 03:57 .
#132
Posté 20 février 2011 - 03:58
Virginian wrote...
This is my stance on it: Mages & rogue archers are sissies.
In the age of swords if you are using magic and some kind of bow you are a sissy because you aren't man or woman enough to face your opponent and watch him/her die in front of you.
*laughs while casting firestorm on an innocent village from a tall cliff*
Modifié par Eclipse_9990, 20 février 2011 - 04:05 .
#133
Posté 20 février 2011 - 03:58
#134
Posté 20 février 2011 - 03:59
#135
Posté 20 février 2011 - 04:10
Virginian wrote...
This is my stance on it: Mages & rogue archers are sissies.
In the age of swords if you are using magic and some kind of bow you are a sissy because you aren't man or woman enough to face your opponent and watch him/her die in front of you.
I love you.
#136
Posté 20 février 2011 - 04:12
#137
Posté 20 février 2011 - 04:14
wulfsturm wrote...
Only girls and girly men like to put on dresses and throw sparkly spells around.
The Templars don't seem to mind.
#138
Posté 20 février 2011 - 04:14
Virginian wrote...
This is my stance on it: Mages & rogue archers are sissies.
In the age of swords if you are using magic and some kind of bow you are a sissy because you aren't man or woman enough to face your opponent and watch him/her die in front of you.
Well, I do think someome has erned themselves a lightning bolt up the ass
#139
Posté 20 février 2011 - 04:15
But not for any heteronormative reasons.
#140
Posté 20 février 2011 - 04:16
Eclipse_9990 wrote...
wulfsturm wrote...
Only girls and girly men like to put on dresses and throw sparkly spells around.
The Templars don't seem to mind.
If Alistair is any indication, wulfsturm's comment still stands.
#141
Posté 20 février 2011 - 04:16
Virginian wrote...
This is my stance on it: Mages & rogue archers are sissies.
In the age of swords if you are using magic and some kind of bow you are a sissy because you aren't man or woman enough to face your opponent and watch him/her die in front of you.
I rather be sissy then dead.
Modifié par Fenn , 20 février 2011 - 04:17 .
#142
Posté 20 février 2011 - 04:23
That's why I comb and groom my chest hairs every morning before I go out into a alcohol-fueled rage to randomly challenge people I meet on the streets to a duel to the death.
#143
Posté 20 février 2011 - 04:25
Virginian wrote...
This is my stance on it: Mages & rogue archers are sissies.
In the age of swords if you are using magic and some kind of bow you are a sissy because you aren't man or woman enough to face your opponent and watch him/her die in front of you.
I just cast a spell on a peasant that made him go through all 1103 stages of ultimate dying agony and I'm the sissy?
#144
Posté 20 février 2011 - 04:26
Even better when you can freeze them to the ground and shatter them into oblivion.
#145
Posté 20 février 2011 - 04:29
Zulmoka531 wrote...
I don't know, there seems to be something...satisfying about pinning someone to the ground with an arrow, then shooting them in the head >.>
This breaks 115 royal laws of arrow saving and conservation, all archers should use a dagger to kill a downed foe if its applicable.
You've lost your license to kill, Mr. Archer.
#146
Posté 20 février 2011 - 04:30
wulfsturm wrote...
Combat isn't combat unless you can see the individual chest hairs on your opponent, everyone knows this!
That's why I comb and groom my chest hairs every morning before I go out into a alcohol-fueled rage to randomly challenge people I meet on the streets to a duel to the death.
But, what if we don't have chest hair?
#147
Posté 20 février 2011 - 04:31
wulfsturm wrote...
Combat isn't combat unless you can see the individual chest hairs on your opponent, everyone knows this!
That's why I comb and groom my chest hairs every morning before I go out into a alcohol-fueled rage to randomly challenge people I meet on the streets to a duel to the death.
To paraphrase a famous general: "Don't attack until you see the bristles of their chest manes."
#148
Posté 20 février 2011 - 04:45
#149
Posté 20 février 2011 - 04:46
Melness wrote...
Zulmoka531 wrote...
I don't know, there seems to be something...satisfying about pinning someone to the ground with an arrow, then shooting them in the head >.>
This breaks 115 royal laws of arrow saving and conservation, all archers should use a dagger to kill a downed foe if its applicable.
You've lost your license to kill, Mr. Archer.
But...but... Nooooooooo
"Critical Mission Failure"
#150
Posté 20 février 2011 - 04:54
IndelibleJester wrote...
Sibling selection.
Although, painfully enough, I'm starting to like carver as much as bethany.
This.
When Carter's death shows theres less emotion from the mother than when bethany dies.





Retour en haut






