Aller au contenu

Photo

Is there any reason NOT to play a mage?


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
158 réponses à ce sujet

#126
Virginian

Virginian
  • Members
  • 911 messages
This is my stance on it: Mages & rogue archers are sissies.

In the age of swords if you are using magic and some kind of bow you are a sissy because you aren't man or woman enough to face your opponent and watch him/her die in front of you.

#127
LobselVith8

LobselVith8
  • Members
  • 16 993 messages

kjdhgfiliuhwe wrote...

LobselVith8 wrote...

Threeparts wrote...

Behold, the awesome power of Breasts.


Considering Bethany is Hawke's sister...


But, the player sitting in that chair isn't. C'mon. Are you so naive that you don't get this? :P

Anyways, if we do get a toolset (anyone know if  we are; it's troubling that it hasn't seemed to be announced), I imagine the forced choice between the two siblings will be one of the first things modded. 


It's existentialism, not naivety.Posted Image

#128
darklordpocky-san

darklordpocky-san
  • Members
  • 490 messages
I'm going Mage all the way (hopefully battlemage or mage knight, if possible). :wizard:

But I don't think EVERYONE and their mother should be a Mage, especially if it's not their area of expertise, or personal preference.

#129
Zulmoka531

Zulmoka531
  • Members
  • 824 messages

Virginian wrote...

This is my stance on it: Mages & rogue archers are sissies.

In the age of swords if you are using magic and some kind of bow you are a sissy because you aren't man or woman enough to face your opponent and watch him/her die in front of you.


Wow haha. Just wow.

#130
Riona45

Riona45
  • Members
  • 3 158 messages
I'll admit that I liked what I saw of Bethany and her death tugged at my heart strings. However, that isn't enough to stop me from playing my absolute favorite class. Playing a non-mage just to "save" Bethany would feel inauthentic to *me*.

#131
Eclipse_9990

Eclipse_9990
  • Members
  • 3 116 messages
If you don't play a Mage your a horrible person, and you should die..

Lol j/k...




















Not really.

Modifié par Eclipse_9990, 20 février 2011 - 03:57 .


#132
Eclipse_9990

Eclipse_9990
  • Members
  • 3 116 messages

Virginian wrote...

This is my stance on it: Mages & rogue archers are sissies.

In the age of swords if you are using magic and some kind of bow you are a sissy because you aren't man or woman enough to face your opponent and watch him/her die in front of you.


*laughs while casting firestorm on an innocent village from a tall cliff* 

Modifié par Eclipse_9990, 20 février 2011 - 04:05 .


#133
Noilly Prat

Noilly Prat
  • Members
  • 721 messages
Because rogues are the balls?

#134
General Balls

General Balls
  • Members
  • 228 messages
Denying yourself magistry is denying yourself everything that is beautiful, loud, and explosive about fantasy RPGs. I save my swordmastery for games that have guns, just to stick it to those progressive donkey-crevasses.

#135
kjdhgfiliuhwe

kjdhgfiliuhwe
  • Members
  • 1 106 messages

Virginian wrote...

This is my stance on it: Mages & rogue archers are sissies.

In the age of swords if you are using magic and some kind of bow you are a sissy because you aren't man or woman enough to face your opponent and watch him/her die in front of you.


I love you.

#136
wulfsturm

wulfsturm
  • Members
  • 2 901 messages
Only girls and girly men like to put on dresses and throw sparkly spells around.

#137
Eclipse_9990

Eclipse_9990
  • Members
  • 3 116 messages

wulfsturm wrote...

Only girls and girly men like to put on dresses and throw sparkly spells around.


The Templars don't seem to mind. ;)

#138
darklordpocky-san

darklordpocky-san
  • Members
  • 490 messages

Virginian wrote...

This is my stance on it: Mages & rogue archers are sissies.

In the age of swords if you are using magic and some kind of bow you are a sissy because you aren't man or woman enough to face your opponent and watch him/her die in front of you.


Well, I do think someome has erned themselves a lightning bolt up the ass :wizard:

#139
Maria Caliban

Maria Caliban
  • Members
  • 26 094 messages
Mages suck.

But not for any heteronormative reasons.

#140
kjdhgfiliuhwe

kjdhgfiliuhwe
  • Members
  • 1 106 messages

Eclipse_9990 wrote...

wulfsturm wrote...

Only girls and girly men like to put on dresses and throw sparkly spells around.


The Templars don't seem to mind. ;)


If Alistair is any indication, wulfsturm's comment still stands. :o

#141
Fenn_

Fenn_
  • Members
  • 1 168 messages

Virginian wrote...

This is my stance on it: Mages & rogue archers are sissies.

In the age of swords if you are using magic and some kind of bow you are a sissy because you aren't man or woman enough to face your opponent and watch him/her die in front of you.


I rather be sissy then dead.  

Modifié par Fenn , 20 février 2011 - 04:17 .


#142
wulfsturm

wulfsturm
  • Members
  • 2 901 messages
Combat isn't combat unless you can see the individual chest hairs on your opponent, everyone knows this!



That's why I comb and groom my chest hairs every morning before I go out into a alcohol-fueled rage to randomly challenge people I meet on the streets to a duel to the death.

#143
Melness

Melness
  • Members
  • 756 messages

Virginian wrote...

This is my stance on it: Mages & rogue archers are sissies.

In the age of swords if you are using magic and some kind of bow you are a sissy because you aren't man or woman enough to face your opponent and watch him/her die in front of you.


I just cast a spell on a peasant that made him go through all 1103 stages of ultimate dying agony and I'm the sissy?

#144
Zulmoka531

Zulmoka531
  • Members
  • 824 messages
I don't know, there seems to be something...satisfying about pinning someone to the ground with an arrow, then shooting them in the head >.>



Even better when you can freeze them to the ground and shatter them into oblivion.

#145
Melness

Melness
  • Members
  • 756 messages

Zulmoka531 wrote...

I don't know, there seems to be something...satisfying about pinning someone to the ground with an arrow, then shooting them in the head >.>


This breaks 115 royal laws of arrow saving and conservation, all archers should use a dagger to kill a downed foe if its applicable.

You've lost your license to kill, Mr. Archer.

#146
kjdhgfiliuhwe

kjdhgfiliuhwe
  • Members
  • 1 106 messages

wulfsturm wrote...

Combat isn't combat unless you can see the individual chest hairs on your opponent, everyone knows this!

That's why I comb and groom my chest hairs every morning before I go out into a alcohol-fueled rage to randomly challenge people I meet on the streets to a duel to the death.


But, what if we don't have chest hair? :(

#147
Noilly Prat

Noilly Prat
  • Members
  • 721 messages

wulfsturm wrote...

Combat isn't combat unless you can see the individual chest hairs on your opponent, everyone knows this!

That's why I comb and groom my chest hairs every morning before I go out into a alcohol-fueled rage to randomly challenge people I meet on the streets to a duel to the death.


To paraphrase a famous general: "Don't attack until you see the bristles of their chest manes."

#148
DIM4

DIM4
  • Members
  • 5 messages
Because mages are intellectual and science elite of this world - REAL mans and womans don't like nerds( so, FIRE THEM UP ).

#149
Zulmoka531

Zulmoka531
  • Members
  • 824 messages

Melness wrote...

Zulmoka531 wrote...

I don't know, there seems to be something...satisfying about pinning someone to the ground with an arrow, then shooting them in the head >.>


This breaks 115 royal laws of arrow saving and conservation, all archers should use a dagger to kill a downed foe if its applicable.

You've lost your license to kill, Mr. Archer.


But...but... Nooooooooo
"Critical Mission Failure"

#150
megaz635

megaz635
  • Members
  • 340 messages

IndelibleJester wrote...

Sibling selection.
Although, painfully enough, I'm starting to like carver as much as bethany.


This.

When Carter's death shows theres less emotion from the mother than when bethany dies.