251 réponses à ce sujet

[Mad-Max90]

Every time the witcher is mentioned as a graphical comparison on this forum, a baby dies by imploding, Ughh the comparison was alright the first 65 times a poster said something about it, now it's being tossed around like a baseball during practice, please people use uour imagination do not copy paste,"yeah the graphics seem ok, but the witcher~****"

[Ethical]

Mad-Max90 wrote...

Every time the witcher is mentioned as a graphical comparison on this forum, a baby dies by imploding, Ughh the comparison was alright the first 65 times a poster said something about it, now it's being tossed around like a baseball during practice, please people use uour imagination do not copy paste,"yeah the graphics seem ok, but the witcher~****"

yea especially since The Witcher 2 is developed ONLY for PC, had they expanded to consoles they would have been very limited on graphics. 

Modifié par Ethical, 19 février 2011 - 10:01 .

[X2-Elijah]

 Yeah, but the Witcher .......
Okay, I just don't like babies 

[Kronner]

Ethical wrote...

Mad-Max90 wrote...

Every time the witcher is mentioned as a graphical comparison on this forum, a baby dies by imploding, Ughh the comparison was alright the first 65 times a poster said something about it, now it's being tossed around like a baseball during practice, please people use uour imagination do not copy paste,"yeah the graphics seem ok, but the witcher~****"

yea especially since The Witcher 2 is developed ONLY for PC, had they expanded to consoles they would have been very limited on graphics.

TW2 will be released on cosoles too. The difference is that the devs do the PC version first and then port it over to consoles, while most other devs do it at the same time, so PC version is nerfed by the console limitations - that is not the case with TW2.

Modifié par Kronner, 19 février 2011 - 10:01 .

[spernus]

Ethical wrote...

Mad-Max90 wrote...

Every time the witcher is mentioned as a graphical comparison on this forum, a baby dies by imploding, Ughh the comparison was alright the first 65 times a poster said something about it, now it's being tossed around like a baseball during practice, please people use uour imagination do not copy paste,"yeah the graphics seem ok, but the witcher~****"

yea especially since The Witcher 2 is developed ONLY for PC, had they expanded to consoles they would have been very limited on graphics.

True,but I don't find the art design to be good.   Dark soul is a console only game,but it does look better than Dragon age 2 and that's mostly because of far superior artistic work.Honestly,art design is definitively not the strong point of the Dragon Age team. 

[packardbell]

The OP is a cloaca.

[Ethical]

Kronner wrote...

Ethical wrote...

Mad-Max90 wrote...

Every time the witcher is mentioned as a graphical comparison on this forum, a baby dies by imploding, Ughh the comparison was alright the first 65 times a poster said something about it, now it's being tossed around like a baseball during practice, please people use uour imagination do not copy paste,"yeah the graphics seem ok, but the witcher~****"

yea especially since The Witcher 2 is developed ONLY for PC, had they expanded to consoles they would have been very limited on graphics.

TW2 will be released on cosoles too. The difference is that the devs do the PC version first and then port it over to consoles, while most other devs do it at the same time, so PC version is nerfed by the console limitations - that is not the case with TW2.

I didn't know they released the witcher games for consoles, can't wait to see screenies on how they end up looking 

[Stompi]

Well, focusing on graphics instead of content would be a easier way to gain attention. And it would lead to even more complaints about how Bioware is targeting the shooter fans. The media didn't care much about The Wicher 1, but now, because of successor's visuals, it's already game of the year for some of them.

Modifié par Stompi, 19 février 2011 - 10:07 .

[Hathur]

Ethical wrote...

Kronner wrote...

Ethical wrote...

Mad-Max90 wrote...

Every time the witcher is mentioned as a graphical comparison on this forum, a baby dies by imploding, Ughh the comparison was alright the first 65 times a poster said something about it, now it's being tossed around like a baseball during practice, please people use uour imagination do not copy paste,"yeah the graphics seem ok, but the witcher~****"

yea especially since The Witcher 2 is developed ONLY for PC, had they expanded to consoles they would have been very limited on graphics.

TW2 will be released on cosoles too. The difference is that the devs do the PC version first and then port it over to consoles, while most other devs do it at the same time, so PC version is nerfed by the console limitations - that is not the case with TW2.

I didn't know they released the witcher games for consoles, can't wait to see screenies on how they end up looking 

They didn't release the Witcher for consoles... they were going to but the project was cancelled about 2 years ago so they could focus fully on the Witcher 2.

The Witcher 2 on consoles is also pure speculation by fans at this point... if you actually go to their forums, you'll see they've said that they'd LIKE to one day make a console version, but not sure they can / will due to resources and team size.

At no point have they even confirmed / said they are outright making a console version of the Witcher 2. The only said they "want to". Frankly there was a lot of speculation they ditched the White Wolf Witcher game for consoles because the Aurora engine was poorly optimized / coded to run on consoles and it just wasn't worth the effort to try to get it to work on the 360 (The Witcher was a massive resource hog on PCs due to poor optimization & coding.. patches eventually made it much better though, but it's still inefficient).

It's a far stretch to expect the Witcher 2 on consoles anytime within the next 1-2 years... Cd Projekt is a small team (comparatively speaking) and I'm skeptical they can optimize their new game engine for the Witcher 2 to run well on consoles (it's demanding hardware-wise from what I can gather... and knowing CD Projekt's history with efficiency in coding).

Modifié par Hathur, 19 février 2011 - 10:12 .

[Kronner]

Hathur wrote...

It's a far stretch to expect the Witcher 2 on consoles anytime within the next 1-2 years... Cd Projekt is a small team (comparatively speaking) and I'm skeptical they can optimize their new game engine for the Witcher 2 to run well on consoles (it's demanding hardware-wise from what I can gather... and knowing CD Projekt's history with efficiency in coding).

http://www.vg247.com...onsole-in-mind/

“You can play The Witcher 2 with joypad – it’s implemented. The whole interface is designed with console in mind, in fact,” CD Projekt RED’s Jan Bartkowicz told IGN.

“It’s the first console project we would like to do,” he explained, adding that the console port is actually already playable in part.

[Noviere]

just jase wrote...

I know it will sound like im trolling but im really not. Its just  that Im pretty dissapointed with Bioware and the direction their games are going in. The new art-direction is all cartoony and anime inspired.. over-the-top animations, weapons rediculously huge yet having no actual impact on whatever theyre hitting. Urgh.

For the sequel of a game that was billed as the 'spiritual successor of Baldurs Gate' it seems the whole thing has just been dumbed-down. Maybe im getting old I cant help but feel like bioware has sold-out. Is the next game just gonna be a dating simulator for 15 yo's to "squee" at.. urgh

What an abortion of a game.. bring on Skyrim

*flush*

Thank you!!!!!! I didn't realize I didn't want DA2 until I read your post! I'm gonna go cancel my pre-order right away! WOOOO!

...

What? Mission accomplished, right?

You can go now.

...

Bye.

[Hathur]

Kronner wrote...

Hathur wrote...

It's a far stretch to expect the Witcher 2 on consoles anytime within the next 1-2 years... Cd Projekt is a small team (comparatively speaking) and I'm skeptical they can optimize their new game engine for the Witcher 2 to run well on consoles (it's demanding hardware-wise from what I can gather... and knowing CD Projekt's history with efficiency in coding).

http://www.vg247.com...onsole-in-mind/

“You can play The Witcher 2 with joypad – it’s implemented. The whole interface is designed with console in mind, in fact,” CD Projekt RED’s Jan Bartkowicz told IGN.

“It’s the first console project we would like to do,” he explained, adding that the console port is actually already playable in part.

Yeah, same thing was said about the White Wolf game (Witcher Console version announced several years ago) ... that got canned. I still wouldn't hold my breath on the Witcher 2 on consoles... not for at least 1-2 years after the release of the PC version.

[Nonoru]

It doesn't seem like trolling,it is.

[SudsyPatriarch]

I admit that DAO being a spiritual successor to Baldurs Gate 2, disappointed me a bit. Also, the initial gameplay videos of DA 2 disappointed me a lot. Nevertheless, i preordered the game a few weeks ago and i´m excited to see what its like.

[KillerYeh]

This is the author of the theme who looks terrible. Please, close this stupid topic!

[Dubya75]

just jase wrote...

Im not mad dude, the game just looks pretty bad.. the demo on youtube = slash slash slash slash slash slash *yawn*.. i was just hoping for something better, bioware has made some awesome games, they dropped the ball on this though

So you base your little "review" on one combat scene. Wow.

[Miss Stab]

Narrsan wrote...


Yup, it's that time again

so amazingly hot.

[FellowerOfOdin]

What exactly is the reason to make such threads?



It's a fact that DA2 has very dated graphics, everyone can see that, there's no need to make a thread and point at it.



We also know that DA2 no longer is affiliated to games like Baldur's Gate anymore.



We also know that the game got streamlined.



We also know that the new style is very cartoony.



Those are facts, so...no need to make so many threads about the issue. People know about those and you know, posting negative things on a forum about the game that's crawling with fanboys might not be such a good idea.



Also...stop comparing Bioware's current games to their older ones. There are 2 eras, one old-school era with RPG gems like the Baldur's Gate series and the current era with Bioware working for EA. I don't say that one is better than the other as it's up to personal taste and age. To me, personally, though, I just wish we could turn back time and have Bioware make the good old RPGs they used to make.



On the other hand, I can also see why some people like their games cartoonish / JRPG influenced, I personally consider it a shame but some like it and might not like older RPGs (mainly youngsters that grew up with dumbed-down, easy games).

[elfdwarf]

if you really want play cartoonish game play naruto wii

this isn't cartoonish game in my opinion

[SandyWB]

Haven't we had enough of these threads? Those who don't like it will keep hating it and keep posting threads like this one, and the rest of us who like it will keep defending it, pointing out that it looks better than Origins and that the important parts are story, character, and gameplay. Not really much else to say.

[XRed_RumX]

[prazision]

The graphics are technically not that bad, but the art direction is really awful from what we've seen. You can render a completely lifelike turd but it is still a turd. There are many examples, but one that keeps bothering me is Aveline's hair. What color is that supposed to be? It's the worst shade of orange I've ever seen in my life. The redesigned Hurlocks are absolutely atrocious, Isabela's outfit is garish and just... not pleasant to look at (and neither is her face or her ridiculously large breasts). A lot of the environments just look really... weird, like somebody just threw a bunch of random crap together without any thought put into the artistic aesthetic of it all. And let's not forget how much brown, brown, brown we've seen or how hilarious Flemeth looks now.



And that's fine, I guess, if the story is good. But the extended gameplay videos that have been put on YouTube (whether they're "the real demo" or not, I'm 100% certain they're the real dialogue and voice actors) showcase some bad writing, bad voice talent, and just plain boring story.



There's a famous quote about a publisher who could tell if your book was any good by reading just the first line - meaning, you need to put your best foot forward and hook people in. Well, if the story gets amazing later, that's super, but the beginning of the game is pretty poor.



All of this is my opinion and I am sure 100 people will call me a "troll" because that seems to be the most popular word on these forums and synonymous with "person I disagree with", but believe it or not, sometimes games are bad, no matter who makes them (ahem, Final Fantasy 11, 13 and 14).



I could be wrong and the plot could get great after the first 5 hours or whatever, but the bad voice acting is something that isn't going to change. At least the VAs for Fenris and Anders are talented, so as long as Merril is decent, that will be my party for the entire game if possible.

[Firky]

Regardless of whether the OP might have a valid complaint, how is that a publicly appropriate use of the word "abortion?" Not cool, IMO.

[gastovski]

The game looks fine you should worry about combat animations

Modifié par gastovski, 19 février 2011 - 11:33 .

[GameBoyish]

Filament wrote...

I think *flush* is appropriate in a way you may not have intended.

QFT