didymos1120 wrote...
Whatever666343431431654324 wrote...
I'm not claiming its evidence.
No, it's still evidence. It's just not evidence that necessarily leads to the hybrid idea and only the hybrid idea, in the same way that the mere existence of fossils doesn't necessarily lead to evolution. We get there when we take other observations into account. What matters is whether the hybrid notion can explain the evidence. And it can.
The thing is, the husks and Reaper implants don't necessitate that the Reapers be bio-mechanical for them to
make sense. It's inaccurate to say "Looking back, the Reapers being bio-mechanical
explains the husks." because the husks were entirely plausible whether the Reapers were bio-mechanical or not, so it's more apt to say that the "evidence"
explains the hybrid notion and not the other way around. Does the Reapers being bio-mechanical "explain" the husks? Yes. Do the husks suggest bio-mechanical Reapers? No.
To use your analogy, that's like saying the existence of fossils leads to the notion of a meteor impact wiping out the dinosaurs. The dinosaurs may very well have been wiped out by a meteor impact, but a fossil is not evidence one way or the other. Would a meteor impact kill the dinosaurs and, by extension, create fossils? Yes. Does the existence of a fossil suggest a meteor impact? No.
In other words, it's a little like saying "All prisoners are criminals, but not all criminals are prisoners."
Hopefully that makes sense.
Modifié par JKoopman, 22 février 2011 - 03:07 .