212 réponses à ce sujet

[Zerakus]

I don't see much difference between the shots, personally. Looks like a different resolution, imo.

[scr280]

Btingly wrote...

scr280 wrote...

Until they can come up with actual 3d i.e. holodecks im not interested

What did you think of the stereo 3d effect in the screenshot? Did you do the cross eye technique?

I tried that and it just made me light headed which according to the health warning on the how to you linked me to means that I might have been causing damage to my eyes so thanks for that.

[Ziggeh]

XBenotto18 wrote...
and be fooled by the OP and buy the product

Eh? Admittedly he was kinda asking for barney by pre-emptively calling people ignorant, but is "I wouldn't use it so I don't want it as an option for other people to enjoy" entirely reasonable?

[Btingly]

Itkovian wrote...

Why all this talk of Unreal engine? Isn't Dragon Age using Bioware's own proprietary engine?

Now ME is done in Unreal, but not DA as far as I know.

Also, whenever anyone says anything in software would be easy to program, a kitten dies. Please keep that in mind: _nothing_ is _ever_ easy to code in complex software. _NOTHING_

Stop killing kittens, please.

Itkovian

Hey thanks for that correction.  I can understand now why Dragon Age can't be FULLy 3D ready, but all they have to do is add a 3d mouse cursor.

[Drowsy0106]

XBenotto18 wrote...

Someone should make a poll to see the percentage of who wants 3D for Dragon Age and be fooled by the OP and buy the product

"It seems 2% already likes the idea, we must push the subject and create further awareness - MOAR TOPICS!!"

[Zkyire]

Btingly wrote...

Raygereio wrote...

AL JA wrote...
Are you the same guy who used to constantly go on about 3d on the mass effect boards. You and about 3 other people actually want 3D. no one cares.

Hey, take it easy one him. It's bad enough for the guy that he wasted all that money on a graphics card with an utterly useless gimmick feature.

This coming from a guy who stares at a flat 2D image.  It's not natural to stare at 2D images, eyes were meant to view objects with depth & convergence.  You guys can't be this ignorant. It's scary.

It's not "natural" to be using a computer either, but you're doing that too.

[Ziggeh]

Zerakus wrote...

I don't see much difference between the shots, personally. Looks like a different resolution, imo.

Pure win.

[Derax]

Ziggeh wrote...

Derax wrote...

Nope no  pop-up book look.

Btingly said it did look that way, so one of you is wrong.

2 last things: I did not meen to offend you with the film industry, in fact your maybe right that they used it of trying to stop leaching, although one could find avatar in 3d from the very beginning  That it is way it is nice you can get the effect without paying extra with the games.....

2nd: It is a pop-up effect but enhanced so you can't really compare it to a " same strange pop-up book look"

3rd: using the pictures is maybe a little bit hard...

PEACE guys

Modifié par Derax, 21 février 2011 - 06:18 .

[scr280]

scr280 wrote...

Btingly wrote...

scr280 wrote...

Until they can come up with actual 3d i.e. holodecks im not interested

What did you think of the stereo 3d effect in the screenshot? Did you do the cross eye technique?

I tried that and it just made me light headed which according to the health warning on the how to you linked me to means that I might have been causing damage to my eyes so thanks for that.

ok my eyes are realy starting to hurt. Btigly you shouldnt link to harmful material.

[Btingly]

scr280 wrote...

Btingly wrote...

scr280 wrote...

Until they can come up with actual 3d i.e. holodecks im not interested

What did you think of the stereo 3d effect in the screenshot? Did you do the cross eye technique?

I tried that and it just made me light headed which according to the health warning on the how to you linked me to means that I might have been causing damage to my eyes so thanks for that.

You're not going to cause damage to your eyes by crossing your eyes.  Your eyes cross A LOT even when you're asleep focusing on dreams during REM.  Yea the first time I tried it my eyes and mind are like "Wtf".  A first time experience in every aspect of life will be new and feel different. 3D is not meant to be viewed with the cross eye technique, the glasses do it for you.

scr280 wrote...

scr280 wrote...

Btingly wrote...

scr280 wrote...

Until they can come up with actual 3d i.e. holodecks im not interested

What did you think of the stereo 3d effect in the screenshot? Did you do the cross eye technique?

I
tried that and it just made me light headed which according to the
health warning on the how to you linked me to means that I might have
been causing damage to my eyes so thanks for that.

ok my eyes are realy starting to hurt. Btigly you shouldnt link to harmful material.

Oh god, it's not going to damage your eyes dude.  I've been doing this technique for the past 15 years. I'm over thirty and have twenty twenty vision.

Modifié par Btingly, 21 février 2011 - 06:22 .

[Junri]

You do realize that 3D viewing has health risks right? Look up binocular dysphoria. Repeated use could cause long term blindness. Don't call us ignorant. We want to keep our sight.

[XBenotto18]

Btingly wrote...

scr280 wrote...

Btingly wrote...

scr280 wrote...

Until they can come up with actual 3d i.e. holodecks im not interested

What did you think of the stereo 3d effect in the screenshot? Did you do the cross eye technique?

I tried that and it just made me light headed which according to the health warning on the how to you linked me to means that I might have been causing damage to my eyes so thanks for that.

You're not going to cause damage to your eyes by crossing your eyes.  Your eyes cross A LOT even when you're asleep focusing on dreams during REM.  Yea the first time I tried it my eyes and mind are like "Wtf".  A first time experience in every aspect of life will be new and feel different. 3D is not meant to be viewed with the cross eye technique, the glasses do it for you.

scr280 wrote...

scr280 wrote...

Btingly wrote...

scr280 wrote...

Until they can come up with actual 3d i.e. holodecks im not interested

What did you think of the stereo 3d effect in the screenshot? Did you do the cross eye technique?

I
tried that and it just made me light headed which according to the
health warning on the how to you linked me to means that I might have
been causing damage to my eyes so thanks for that.

ok my eyes are realy starting to hurt. Btigly you shouldnt link to harmful material.

Oh god, it's not going to damage your eyes dude.  I've been doing this technique for the past 15 years. I'm over thirty and have twenty twenty vision.

Poor marketing method. you should take the day off and go back to school

Modifié par XBenotto18, 21 février 2011 - 06:24 .

[Derax]

Junri wrote...

You do realize that 3D viewing has health risks right? Look up binocular dysphoria. Repeated use could cause long term blindness. Don't call us ignorant. We want to keep our sight.

Just like looking into the pc ^^

[Thugcry01]

3D is a gimmick. It was a gimmick 50 years ago. It was a gimmick 20 years ago. It's a gimmick today. Great way to make money though. ^^

[Xtori]

scr280 wrote...

scr280 wrote...

Btingly wrote...

scr280 wrote...

Until they can come up with actual 3d i.e. holodecks im not interested

What did you think of the stereo 3d effect in the screenshot? Did you do the cross eye technique?

I tried that and it just made me light headed which according to the health warning on the how to you linked me to means that I might have been causing damage to my eyes so thanks for that.

ok my eyes are realy starting to hurt. Btigly you shouldnt link to harmful material.

LOL

[Btingly]

Junri wrote...

You do realize that 3D viewing has health risks right? Look up binocular dysphoria. Repeated use could cause long term blindness. Don't call us ignorant. We want to keep our sight.

Panasonic has announced testers who have been exposed to roughly 10,000 hours of 3D with no problems reported what so ever. I have never experienced what you're talking about. I'll tell you one thing though, life is all about risk vs reward.  The more you risk, the more you'll get out of life. Don't be a pansy

I have 20/20 vision and have been using 3D for a LONG time.

The monitor is also a health risk, typing too much is also a health risk and leads to carpal tunnel.

Drinking too much caffeine has health risks too.

The list goes on and on. Welcome to life.

Modifié par Btingly, 21 février 2011 - 06:26 .

[scr280]

Btingly wrote...

Oh god, it's not going to damage your eyes dude.  I've been doing this technique for the past 15 years. I'm over thirty and have twenty twenty vision.

Well thanks mr high and mighty with his fancy twenty twenty vision. You should put a health warning on your post, somthing like "People with twenty twenty vision only all people without are inferior humans and are unable to look at this without pain and suffering"

Modifié par scr280, 21 février 2011 - 06:28 .

[Btingly]

scr280 wrote...

Btingly wrote...

Oh god, it's not going to damage your eyes dude.  I've been doing this technique for the past 15 years. I'm over thirty and have twenty twenty vision.

Well thanks mr high and might with his fancy twenty twenty vision. You should put a health warning on your post, somthing like "People with twenty twenty vision only all people without are inferior humans and are unable to look at this without pain and suffering"

3D requires an adjustment period. It takes roughly three weeks for your eyes to adapt to 3D from the inferior 2D images you've been looking at all your life.

[JensenBakura]

Btingly wrote...

Junri wrote...

You do realize that 3D viewing has health risks right? Look up binocular dysphoria. Repeated use could cause long term blindness. Don't call us ignorant. We want to keep our sight.

Panasonic has announced testers who have been exposed to roughly 10,000 hours of 3D with no problems reported what so ever. I have never experienced what you're talking about. I'll you one thing though, life is all about risk vs reward.  The more you risk, the more you'll get out of life. Don't be a pansy

I have 20/20 vision and have been using 3D for a LONG time.

I just realised why you make so many identical threads about 3D - it's so you can cross your eyes and make all the threads merge so they're in 3D, isn't it?

[Ziggeh]

Derax wrote...

maybe right that they used it of trying to stop leaching, although one could find avatar in 3d from the very beginning

It was the difficulty in pirating Avatar that sold them on the idea, which is why shortly after they started glueing it onto films that had been made without, with unfortunate effect. Avatar itself was 3D simply because of the producers technological interest in it.

Derax wrote...
It is a pop-up effect but enhanced so you can't really compare it to a " same strange pop-up book look

I'm not sure what that means. It's the unnatural edge to things, combined with obviously flat textures (like the ground in that picture) that makes elements look isolated, as in a pop up book rather than as a single cohesive view. Not that I'm saying 3D looks like that mind, just the crossy eyey thing, I was asking if they had the same "issue" (as I say, I don't think it's any better or worse, just different).

[XBenotto18]

Btingly wrote...

Dragon Age II demo is not 3D ready, i'm worried.  There isn't a 3D mouse cursor.  Big companies like Blizzard have incorporated a 3D mouse cursor for World of Warcraft and I hope Bioware does the same for their games.

I want you guys to enjoy the beauty of 3D for Dragon Age & Dragon Age II.

Here is a 3D screenshot I took and uploaded so you guys can see how Dragon Age looks in 3D.

1. Open up this link in a new window: oi53.tinypic.com/2rmsgwi.jpg

2. Then cross your eyes until you see THREE images, then focus your eyes on the middle image.

You'll see Dragon Age with a 3D effect.

(Note: With 3D glasses there is no discomfort like crossing your eyes).



Here is a tutorial that explains how to do it more precisely: www.neilcreek.com/blog/2008/02/28/how-to-see-3d-photos/

It takes practice.

(I know this is Dragon Age II discussion topic, but I'm posing this hoping devs and producers will see it and make Dragon Age II stereo compatible.).

Sue for health risks

no health warning

Modifié par XBenotto18, 21 février 2011 - 06:30 .

[Drowsy0106]

Thugcry01 wrote...

3D is a gimmick. It was a gimmick 50 years ago. It was a gimmick 20 years ago. It's a gimmick today. Great way to make money though. ^^

The things i made with paper, carton and a old shoe box in kindergarten where not gimmick, make fun of me all you want but i made some people very proud that day. 

[Btingly]

JensenBakura wrote...

Btingly wrote...

Junri wrote...

You do realize that 3D viewing has health risks right? Look up binocular dysphoria. Repeated use could cause long term blindness. Don't call us ignorant. We want to keep our sight.

Panasonic has announced testers who have been exposed to roughly 10,000 hours of 3D with no problems reported what so ever. I have never experienced what you're talking about. I'll you one thing though, life is all about risk vs reward.  The more you risk, the more you'll get out of life. Don't be a pansy

I have 20/20 vision and have been using 3D for a LONG time.

I just realised why you make so many identical threads about 3D - it's so you can cross your eyes and make all the threads merge so they're in 3D, isn't it?

You actually bring up a good point.  I can't wait until the browser is in 3D, this will let me manage multiple windows more efficiently. I embrace the future, i'm not afraid of it like most of the responses in this thread.

Dragon Age is a beautiful game that deserves stereoscopic respect.

[DJBare]

This is the one I prefer, though it's limited to one person viewing only.

[XBenotto18]

Dragon age II should not be in 3D



said it to be on topic