248 réponses à ce sujet

[JrayM16]

Alex109222 wrote...

JrayM16 wrote...

Anathemic wrote...

Darkeus wrote...

And I have heard a lot of complaining that The Witcher actually doesn't have much to do with the stories. Then again, people will complain and compare anything on the internet.

TW1 was created because of the stories. It expands where the saga leaves off. You would know this if you actually played the game.

Chill.

sounded preety calm to me. 

IT was more of a response to the overall tone of her psots in this thread, which have not been chill.

[SnakeHelah]

On what are you guys basing that Da2 is now an action oriented rpg? Just how foolish is it to make such assumptions? The combat now is basically faster paced. Instead of running to a foe and waiting some time for a skill to use, it executes instantly. That is what basically changed. They just improved it from what it was in origins.

[Alex109222]

XBenotto18 wrote...

Alex109222 wrote...

tez19 wrote...

Darkeus wrote...

tez19 wrote...

Rockworm503 wrote...

Alex109222 wrote...

 meanwhile

All this overhype BS on The Witcher 2 makes me so wish that it fails big time.
Yeah you don't see me going to the witcher forums and going on about DA2.

i agree with you, it just shows how many witcher apologists are on this site as when you confront them you are called a troll.
I really am amazed why they are here and not on the witcher 2 forums. Are they that boring?? strange.

They are pretty empty over there.....

LOL, I see why they are all here then annoying us DA fans.

How many do you think?

one = Anathemic

 that don't like "all" of them

[Darkeus]

[quote]astreqwerty wrote...

[quote]Alex109222 wrote...

Let's see now
>worse graphics than the prequal compareable to the PS2
>rushed to no end
>bash buttons everything dies
YEAH BUT AWSUM CONTENT TROLL!
(gone by previous game)
>Bioware illusion choices, where all choices lead you to the same place
>romances, give someone a gift and watch them talk your ear of

and you guys are hyping it why? 
Nice Darkspawn you have thar.

one reason hes still allowed in these forums?..
on topic:
dragon age 2 was a bad call this early.they should have taken their time and they didnt therefore dont expect miracles..but from what ive seen the game looks promising(less promising than biowares other work)and it proves that bioware is such a pro company they can pull of a rushed work with respectable quality and for that i respect them and im goin to buy da2 ultimately.However if they announce da3 in less than 2 years time then im so done with them.simple as that.

[/quote]

That looks like a good definition of troll to me.

[gastovski]

SnakeHelah wrote...

On what are you guys basing that Da2 is now an action oriented rpg? Just how foolish is it to make such assumptions? The combat now is basically faster paced. Instead of running to a foe and waiting some time for a skill to use, it executes instantly. That is what basically changed. They just improved it from what it was in origins.

keep believing that...

[Anathemic]

Darkeus wrote...

Anathemic wrote...

Darkeus wrote...

And I have heard a lot of complaining that The Witcher actually doesn't have much to do with the stories. Then again, people will complain and compare anything on the internet.

TW1 was created because of the stories. It expands where the saga leaves off. You would know this if you actually played the game.

Own it, played it, still on my PC.  Good game actually, and I was not even familiar with a lot of the background.

SO I do know this.  Not my complaint actually, was just surprised to see many, many people complaining about that when talking about the game.  Sorry, you can't troll someone who is familiar with the game and has played it for many hours.

Actually it kinda was your complaint, bolded it for you.

Anyways even if you have played TW1 congrats for you, loved the game. But anyone whose played TW1 and enjoyed it to a degree knows that arguing its gameplay is really stupid, as it was just subpar.

[DarthCaine]

Dan_cw wrote...

Have you folks even considered your computer may not even run The Witcher 2 well or at the highest settings?

The Witcher 2 is optimised for PC and has low system requirements. DA2, on the other hand, is NOT. I tried the DX11 settings in the demo and it ran like crap for me

[elearon1]

>>Go read the books then. Don't play such a janky game. Also I was on board with the story until they added "time travel". I'm not crying. I'm laughing at the witcher fanboys. Bioware games rate higher and sell more. What more would I want?

So you didn't like the game? Big deal? I liked both DA:O and the Witcher - I look forward to both sequels for different reasons. (I already know I like Geralt, I hope to get invested in Hawke as well) Does it have to be a pissing contest? There were, for those who enjoyed it, some very valid reasons to like the Witcher ... but just as you won't like all the books or movies I enjoy, you shouldn't expect we'll like the same games; that doesn't make yours or mine inferior. (well, yours maybe ) Obviously I saw things in it you didn't ... had patience for it where you did not.

Oh, and the reason to buy the parry arrow skill? It allows you to ... parry arrows. Seriously, helps out a lot against archers in the last act. (Geralt could also do it in the books - just to draw some parallels to the fiction - and it is rather amusing to see the bandits about pee themselves the first time he does it, makes you appreciate just how scary a person people see Geralt to be ... seriously, how many people do you know who could parry an arrow in flight? He really has some of that epic sword and sorcery "hero" feel to him.)

Modifié par elearon1, 21 février 2011 - 10:13 .

[Alex109222]

[quote]Darkeus wrote...

[quote]astreqwerty wrote...

[quote]Alex109222 wrote...

Let's see now
>worse graphics than the prequal compareable to the PS2
>rushed to no end
>bash buttons everything dies
YEAH BUT AWSUM CONTENT TROLL!
(gone by previous game)
>Bioware illusion choices, where all choices lead you to the same place
>romances, give someone a gift and watch them talk your ear of

and you guys are hyping it why? 
Nice Darkspawn you have thar.

one reason hes still allowed in these forums?..
on topic:
dragon age 2 was a bad call this early.they should have taken their time and they didnt therefore dont expect miracles..but from what ive seen the game looks promising(less promising than biowares other work)and it proves that bioware is such a pro company they can pull of a rushed work with respectable quality and for that i respect them and im goin to buy da2 ultimately.However if they announce da3 in less than 2 years time then im so done with them.simple as that.

[/quote]

That looks like a good definition of troll to me.

[/quote]
What critisism? No wonder "troll" is thrown around alot. 

[Dan_cw]

Alex109222 wrote...

Just something off-topic, someone (on these forums) define "troll" for me.

Sure, can do. Someone who's on the forum to spread information that isn't true and to rile up people for the sheer pleasure of it.

This also includes posting pictures of a game to prove that it has poor graphics, when the screenshot used is of a poor quality/early build. (Though I don't believe that was you?)

[Chuvvy]

Yellow Words wrote...

DA2 has to surpass DAO or they'll shut down the franchise? How do you know that?

Also, they've said they're not done with the Morrigan story.

Well I'm done with Morrigans story. I just don't care anymore. If it's the plot of DA game I'd still play it but after Witch Hunt I just don't care.

[Seb Hanlon]

This is your hourly reminder to stay on target and not let the thread get dragged into a Witcher thrash, nor discussions of "what is a troll". These are the DA2 forums. There's a whole off-topic forum all the way over there.



Thanks.

[Darkeus]

Anathemic wrote...

Darkeus wrote...

Anathemic wrote...

Darkeus wrote...

And I have heard a lot of complaining that The Witcher actually doesn't have much to do with the stories. Then again, people will complain and compare anything on the internet.

TW1 was created because of the stories. It expands where the saga leaves off. You would know this if you actually played the game.

Own it, played it, still on my PC.  Good game actually, and I was not even familiar with a lot of the background.

SO I do know this.  Not my complaint actually, was just surprised to see many, many people complaining about that when talking about the game.  Sorry, you can't troll someone who is familiar with the game and has played it for many hours.

Actually it kinda was your complaint, bolded it for you.

Anyways even if you have played TW1 congrats for you, loved the game. But anyone whose played TW1 and enjoyed it to a degree knows that arguing its gameplay is really stupid, as it was just subpar.

Look at thee bold again.  I think it says I have HEARD.  This would imply that it is not my opinion but others' opinions that I have seen or heard.  Not my own.

I mean, really?  Comprehend and then quote silly!  

[PhrosniteAgainROFL]

Anathemic wrote...

PhrosniteAgainROFL wrote...

Go read the books then. Don't play such a janky game. Also I was on board with the story until they added "time travel". I'm not crying. I'm laughing at the witcher fanboys. Bioware games rate higher and sell more. What more would I want?

Books were the reason why TW1 was created in the first place?

And why do people rely on ratings, did you know Oblivion still scores higher than BioWare games?

Yes, I do know... but not higher than BG2 and ME2 I not saying that games with 80+ are bad. They are great games. What I'm confused about is how did the witcher get a pass in 2007--best year in gaming-- when it had a mile long list of problems...

[AlexXIV]

hhh89 wrote...

I never understand this war. I will buy and enjoy all the RPG that I can this year. To me, both TW2 and DA2 will probably be good games, and even great games (don't know for both if on the same level of DAO), as ME3 and Skyrim.

I understand it. These are the DA2 forums and DA2 is released in 2 weeks. So they come here to badmouth DA2.
Looks to me like a sort of campaign. I wouldn't have anything bad to say about the Witcher if I hadn't bought the game and played it. Now I have alot of bad things to say but I won't because it doesn't have anything to do with the games I enjoy. Good thing about bad games, they make you appreciate the good ones more. So thanks for that CDP,

[KenKenpachi]

A bit off topic but whats with all this "if made in 2 years or 1.5 its rushed!" talk? I mean really I don't like waiting 5 years for a game given how fast systems change now I'm honestly surprised the PS-3, Wii, and X-box 360 haven't had a replacement planned yet. Happy about that though.

[tez19]

elearon1 wrote...

>>Go read the books then. Don't play such a janky game. Also I was on board with the story until they added "time travel". I'm not crying. I'm laughing at the witcher fanboys. Bioware games rate higher and sell more. What more would I want?

So you didn't like the game? Big deal? I liked both DA:O and the Witcher - I look forward to both sequels for different reasons. (I already know I like Geralt, I hope to get invested in Hawke as well) Does it have to be a pissing contest? There were, for those who enjoyed it, some very valid reasons to like the Witcher ... but just as you won't like all the books or movies I enjoy, you shouldn't expect we'll like the same games; that doesn't make yours or mine inferior. (well, yours maybe ) Obviously I saw things in it you didn't ... had patience for it where you did not.

Oh, and the reason to buy the parry arrow skill? It allows you to ... parry arrows. Seriously, helps out a lot against archers in the last act. (Geralt could also do it in the books - just to draw some parallels to the fiction - and it is rather amusing to see the bandits about pee themselves the first time he does it, makes you appreciate just how scary a person people see Geralt to be ... seriously, how many people do you know who could parry an arrow in flight? He really has some of that epic sword and sorcery "hero" feel to him.)

achilles couldn't parry arrows and he was the greatest warrior of all time.

[cephasjames]

DragonWarrior517 wrote...

No one can deny Awakening and the other DLC were big disappointments...

I can. And I will. I thought they were all good and I enjoyed them very much.

[Melduran]

Trolls are most often found in cold, mountainous regions, but can be encountered nearly anywhere.



Trolls are prevalent in the notoriously-named Troll Fens, as well as the Corusk and Yatil Mountains. A black-hided variety can be found in the Land of Black Ice.

Typical physical characteristics



The average troll stands nine feet high and weighs roughly 500 pounds, though females tend to be a bit larger than males. The hide of trolls is rubbery, and usually either moss green, putrid grey, or mottled gray and green. Their coarse hair is typically iron grey, or greenish-black.



Trolls initially seem to be somewhat shorter, due to their sagging shoulders and tendency to hunch forward. They walk with an uneven gait, and their arms dangle and drag the ground when running. Despite this apparent awkwardness, trolls are quite agile.



Trolls are infamous for their regenerative abilities, able to recover from the most grievous of wounds or regenerate entire limbs given time. Severing a troll's head results merely in temporary incapacitation, rather than death. After cutting off a troll's head or other limbs, one must seal the wounds with fire or acid to prevent regeneration. Because of this, most adventurers will typically carry some sort of implement capable of creating fire.

[Darkeus]

Seb Hanlon wrote...

This is your hourly reminder to stay on target and not let the thread get dragged into a Witcher thrash, nor discussions of "what is a troll". These are the DA2 forums. There's a whole off-topic forum all the way over there.

Thanks.

Oh it might be a bit too late for that. 

[gastovski]

Seb Hanlon wrote...

This is your hourly reminder to stay on target and not let the thread get dragged into a Witcher thrash, nor discussions of "what is a troll". These are the DA2 forums. There's a whole off-topic forum all the way over there.

Thanks.

God has spoken.

[XBenotto18]

Seb Hanlon wrote...

This is your hourly reminder to stay on target and not let the thread get dragged into a Witcher thrash, nor discussions of "what is a troll". These are the DA2 forums. There's a whole off-topic forum all the way over there.

Thanks.

the off topic forum is nothing but a ghost town

[PhrosniteAgainROFL]

DarthCaine wrote...

Dan_cw wrote...

Have you folks even considered your computer may not even run The Witcher 2 well or at the highest settings?

The Witcher 2 is optimised for PC and has low system requirements. DA2, on the other hand, is NOT. I tried the DX11 settings in the demo and it ran like crap for me

Dunno... min 512MB video does't seem low end to me...

[JrayM16]

Darkeus wrote...

Anathemic wrote...

Darkeus wrote...

Anathemic wrote...

Darkeus wrote...

And I have heard a lot of complaining that The Witcher actually doesn't have much to do with the stories. Then again, people will complain and compare anything on the internet.

TW1 was created because of the stories. It expands where the saga leaves off. You would know this if you actually played the game.

Own it, played it, still on my PC.  Good game actually, and I was not even familiar with a lot of the background.

SO I do know this.  Not my complaint actually, was just surprised to see many, many people complaining about that when talking about the game.  Sorry, you can't troll someone who is familiar with the game and has played it for many hours.

Actually it kinda was your complaint, bolded it for you.

Anyways even if you have played TW1 congrats for you, loved the game. But anyone whose played TW1 and enjoyed it to a degree knows that arguing its gameplay is really stupid, as it was just subpar.

Look at thee bold again.  I think it says I have HEARD.  This would imply that it is not my opinion but others' opinions that I have seen or heard.  Not my own.

I mean, really?  Comprehend and then quote silly!  

[Dan_cw]

I'd just lock it to be honest.