3 réponses à ce sujet

[snow0815]

Is it intentional that onehanded swords have three times the dps of twohanded ones? Seems rather absurd.

[Zhriver]

I believe yes, 2 handed swords do AoE dmg on each swing.

I believe someone from Bioware said that rogues where ment for higher single target dps compared to the warrior.
While the warrior shreds multiple foes faster.

Modifié par Zhriver, 23 février 2011 - 02:36 .

[snow0815]

Zhriver wrote...

I believe yes, 2 handed swords do AoE dmg on each swing.

I believe someone from Bioware said that rogues where ment for higher single target dps compared to the warrior.
While the warrior shreds multiple foes faster.

Can't say I noticed any AOE damage with normal attacks, just when using attack skills. 2H attacks should be higher dps than 1H+shield to make up for the lack of protection. After all it is supposed to be the offensive build while a shield tank clearly is defensive.

I agree that rogues should have top melee dps (at least when able to do backstabs) but regarding warriors, there should be a distinctive difference between 1H and 2H dps, and it should be the other way round.

Modifié par snow0815, 23 février 2011 - 02:52 .

[Haussier]

there was a little aoe damage with normal attacks. There are skills that will make this a bigger factor later on.