Chrumpek wrote...
Learn to read man, I never said it was to difficult nor that I had problems and then switched to lower difficulty - I just didn't try it with this group and wanted to address that before peopel start qqing its not possible etc.
Don't start making assumptions out of your craphole. Anyways good that we understood each other ~^ back on topic -> Ommission of arcane warrior saddens me since I enjoyed sword'n board mage a lot. Oh well high hopes for blood magic then...
Hey, how about you, oh I don't know, type what you actually mean then instead of saying one thing and then blowing up because people are reading it as you wrote it, not how you
thought it?
Believe it or not I passed DA:O on hard (not nightmare nope tho hard
is still viable as possible) as a full melee team of Me as a dual wield
warrior, sten as 2hander reaver, oghren as 2hander guardian//bers and
zevran as dual//assa///duelist.
"Not nightmare nope" -- which means you have not beaten it with that group yet. If you had stopped there, it could be assumed that it was either too hard for you with that group OR that you simply had not bothered. But no, you continue with "tho hard is still viable as possible". This statement claims that Nightmare is not viable or possible. Being a "r3Al c00l dud3" to cover up your inadequate communication skills doesn't impress anyone either.
Modifié par Graunt, 01 mars 2011 - 10:39 .