Nonoru wrote...
Suck it up or don't play.Noone forces you.
Thats not going to work. We tried that
Nonoru wrote...
Suck it up or don't play.Noone forces you.
In Exile wrote...
topster88 wrote..
Even knowing that his dad died, again, how would you supposed to know what he meant by "He won't be alone"? Anyone who says "Well OBVIOULSY he's talking about his dead father" *click* has ESP and needs to get on Ripley's Believe It Or Not
Or we might just think that way. There was a line in DA:O you had with Morrigain about touching which she took as sexual and I thought the line was basically loaded with sarcasm.
XBenotto18 wrote...
Who? I've been here all this time. NO ONE AGREES
Cloaking_Thane wrote...
Well I've heard various iterations spoken at funerals.....so....idk like I've admitted there are flaws, but for me the good outweighs the bad hands down
Naitaka wrote...
Cloaking_Thane wrote...
Well I've heard various iterations spoken at funerals.....so....idk like I've admitted there are flaws, but for me the good outweighs the bad hands down
Yah, at least alot more people I know are now interested in DA2 when I couldn't get them to like DA:O for the life of me. I must say that both the combat and dialogue system does make it alot more accessable to people who are not the core RPG crowd to begin with.
topster88 wrote...
XBenotto18 wrote...
Who? I've been here all this time. NO ONE AGREES
No one except Metalunatic, _Loc_N_lol_ , Naitaka , XRed_RumX, TJPags.....
topster88 wrote...
XBenotto18 wrote...
Who? I've been here all this time. NO ONE AGREES
No one except Metalunatic, _Loc_N_lol_ , Naitaka , XRed_RumX, TJPags.....
Modifié par HTTP 404, 25 février 2011 - 05:04 .
XBenotto18 wrote...
topster88 wrote...
XBenotto18 wrote...
Who? I've been here all this time. NO ONE AGREES
No one except Metalunatic, _Loc_N_lol_ , Naitaka , XRed_RumX, TJPags.....
OP, Metalunatic, _Loc_N_lol_ , Naitaka , XRed_RumX, TJPags..... < everyone else
Cloaking_Thane wrote...
Its increasingly obvious this is a my way or highway thread,
OP has resolutely ignored the merits of a voiced protag/paraphrase system, despite well reasoned responses explaining said merits, and has increasingly not responded to questions appropriately or simply asked another question in response.
"I" cant figure out what Hawke will say next, is not a problem with the paraphasing, When you put all of the pieces together you can make an informed decision:
1) context
2)Icon
3) paraphrase
please like i said 90% of Mass effect dialogue leads to zero suprise and thats without icon help
Modifié par topster88, 25 février 2011 - 05:07 .
topster88 wrote...
Cloaking_Thane wrote...
Its increasingly obvious this is a my way or highway thread,
OP has resolutely ignored the merits of a voiced protag/paraphrase system, despite well reasoned responses explaining said merits, and has increasingly not responded to questions appropriately or simply asked another question in response.
"I" cant figure out what Hawke will say next, is not a problem with the paraphasing, When you put all of the pieces together you can make an informed decision:
1) context
2)Icon
3) paraphrase
please like i said 90% of Mass effect dialogue leads to zero suprise and thats without icon help
It doesn't help though when 1) the conext is misleading, 2) the Icon is misleading, and 3) the paraphrasing is nowhere near descriptive enough.
And I haven't been ignoring arguments. Here's the arguments I've seen in favor of the radial menu:
- "It looks better than a list": I could not care less.
- "More text would be too cluttered": It looked fine in DA:O
- "It would be repetative to have the VA say the same thing as the text": Then either make the protagonist silent or make the blurbs more descriptive.
- "Tone is more important than the words": BOTH tone and words are important. Just because they solved the tone problem with origins doesn't mean it's ok to mess up the text.
Did I miss anything?
Cloaking_Thane wrote...
-snip-
Further I dont think we've lost too much RPG going to a voiced protag/ paraphase system, but this seems to be the evolution, and so far I'm on board with it.
Naitaka wrote...
XBenotto18 wrote...
topster88 wrote...
XBenotto18 wrote...
Who? I've been here all this time. NO ONE AGREES
No one except Metalunatic, _Loc_N_lol_ , Naitaka , XRed_RumX, TJPags.....
OP, Metalunatic, _Loc_N_lol_ , Naitaka , XRed_RumX, TJPags..... < everyone else
I disagree.
OP, Metalunatic, _Loc_N_lol_ , Naitaka , XRed_RumX, TJPags..... < You
is a more accurate statement.
Less of a troll that is...
Modifié par XBenotto18, 25 février 2011 - 05:08 .
HTTP 404 wrote...
topster88 wrote...
Cloaking_Thane wrote...
Its increasingly obvious this is a my way or highway thread,
OP has resolutely ignored the merits of a voiced protag/paraphrase system, despite well reasoned responses explaining said merits, and has increasingly not responded to questions appropriately or simply asked another question in response.
"I" cant figure out what Hawke will say next, is not a problem with the paraphasing, When you put all of the pieces together you can make an informed decision:
1) context
2)Icon
3) paraphrase
please like i said 90% of Mass effect dialogue leads to zero suprise and thats without icon help
It doesn't help though when 1) the conext is misleading, 2) the Icon is misleading, and 3) the paraphrasing is nowhere near descriptive enough.
And I haven't been ignoring arguments. Here's the arguments I've seen in favor of the radial menu:
- "It looks better than a list": I could not care less.
- "More text would be too cluttered": It looked fine in DA:O
- "It would be repetative to have the VA say the same thing as the text": Then either make the protagonist silent or make the blurbs more descriptive.
- "Tone is more important than the words": BOTH tone and words are important. Just because they solved the tone problem with origins doesn't mean it's ok to mess up the text.
Did I miss anything?
why dont we see how it works on when the game is out? nothing is without its flaws so I give you that. maybe then we can have a better idea and then throw out ideas that could work maybe in DA3 it can be improved.
tankgirly wrote...
I have no problem with it.
Obviously you are not a Mass Effect fan.
XBenotto18 wrote...
At least I'm not saying anything bad about DAII, I dont see how I'm a troll. If you dont like the wheel then thats fine Mr.T
topster88 wrote...
The_mango55 wrote...
This has probably come up before, but I'll state it again anyway.
Have you ever played a game with fully voiced PC dialogue where you select the exact words your character says?
If so, do you not realize how boring it is to listen to your character say the exact same thing you just read?
None of the response choices in origins took longer than 2 seconds to read. I don't see how it would be boring.
topster88 wrote...
Cloaking_Thane wrote...
Its increasingly obvious this is a my way or highway thread,
OP has resolutely ignored the merits of a voiced protag/paraphrase system, despite well reasoned responses explaining said merits, and has increasingly not responded to questions appropriately or simply asked another question in response.
"I" cant figure out what Hawke will say next, is not a problem with the paraphasing, When you put all of the pieces together you can make an informed decision:
1) context
2)Icon
3) paraphrase
please like i said 90% of Mass effect dialogue leads to zero suprise and thats without icon help
It doesn't help though when 1) the conext is misleading, 2) the Icon is misleading, and 3) the paraphrasing is nowhere near descriptive enough.
And I haven't been ignoring arguments. Here's the arguments I've seen in favor of the radial menu:
- "It looks better than a list": I could not care less.
- "More text would be too cluttered": It looked fine in DA:O
- "It would be repetative to have the VA say the same thing as the text": Then either make the protagonist silent or make the blurbs more descriptive.
- "Tone is more important than the words": BOTH tone and words are important. Just because they "solved" the tone problem with origins doesn't mean it's ok to mess up the words.
Did I miss anything?
topster88 wrote...
- "It looks better than a list": I could not care less.
topster88 wrote...
- "More text would be too cluttered": It looked fine in DA:O
topster88 wrote...
- "It would be repetative to have the VA say the same thing as the text": Then either make the protagonist silent or make the blurbs more descriptive.
topster88 wrote...
- "Tone is more important than the words": BOTH tone and words are important. Just because they solved the tone problem with origins doesn't mean it's ok to mess up the text.
topster88 wrote...
Did I miss anything?
Modifié par XBenotto18, 25 février 2011 - 05:22 .