No problem
They usually make very fair tests and I guess what they said about DA2 could be expected if you were somehow objective. 18 months of developing time isn't much anymore and to shorten the development time, you need to make amendments that include cutting features out (individual companion clothing, takes a lot of time), stuff like recycling entire areas...see my previous post.
They stated that DA2 is a good game, that could have been great and that's exactly what I think. I guess it's EA wanting to push the new game out asap, but it certainly was a bad decision. DA2 just needed more time since it is the successor to such a great game. It's extremely hard to stay on that level and DA2 fails that task...and I dare say it's mostly because of the short development time.
What REALLY bothers me, however, is one paragraph in the article:
"Compared to Origins, most companions stay pretty bland. The reason for Merrile leaving her tribe is hardly explained, same as Aveline's motivation to even accept the, according to her, unpleasant guard job."
That was a pretty big shock to me as I liked the companions in DA:O though some of them were also very bland (Morrigan!), but they were somehow interesting and you had a detailed background. Maybe just another victim of not enough time
Also, what's with the very cheap savegame import function? When you import a save game with Alistair as king, in DA2, you get....a barely 2 minutes long dialog with him. That's cheap.