Anyone's Fem-Hawke gonna have hot Lesbian sex with Isabella?
#101
Posté 26 février 2011 - 05:34
#102
Posté 26 février 2011 - 05:35
#103
Posté 26 février 2011 - 05:35
#104
Posté 26 février 2011 - 05:35
Aesieru wrote...
My Avatar is a Lizard wrote...
there are diffrent forms of christianity,Aesieru wrote...
Oh in Heavens...
Edit:
Also, you cannot be a Christian and pick and choose what you believe... anyone who is a Christian believes the Bible to be fact, else they aren't a Christian, and homosexuality is... well unfortunately for the people who think they're Christian but disagree, a damnation, and I believe they used the term "abomination". Shall I quote scripture? I see no reason to further this... my whole statement was taking out of meaning and the flamers can on and incorrectly classified me any numerous amount of things.
Not all Condemn Gays
Incorrect, all Christianity believes the Bible... we can go into Catholicism if you like but they are extremely anti-homosexual. You aren't a Christian if you don't believe in God's Word... that's the basic definition of that religion.
I would just like to point out your setting yourself up for a perma ban from the forums
Your views on who is a christian and who is not is irrelevent here.
#105
Posté 26 février 2011 - 05:36
sasukeuchiha225 wrote...
Look here **** dont tell me what i can and cant believe in i am a Christian I dont believe in RELIGION because of people like you. As long as i believe in GOD that makes me a Christian oh and by the way its a sin to pass judgment on any human being so **** off. Sorry Bioware this idiot needs to know his place.Aesieru wrote...
Oh in Heavens...
Edit:
Also, you cannot be a Christian and pick and choose what you believe... anyone who is a Christian believes the Bible to be fact, else they aren't a Christian, and homosexuality is... well unfortunately for the people who think they're Christian but disagree, a damnation, and I believe they used the term "abomination". Shall I quote scripture? I see no reason to further this... my whole statement was taking out of meaning and the flamers can on and incorrectly classified me any numerous amount of things.
Hypocrisy, eh?
I place no judgment, I simply state that I am repulsed by what this topic's initial point stated, which I have clarified 5 times and is completely ignored each time because people just want to rage...
Yes, get out all your transgressions upon me...
#106
Posté 26 février 2011 - 05:36
Aesieru wrote...
Everything got misinterpreted because people just want to rage at anything they think is legalistic... Agh.
Ugh...
My statement targets the men who want to see girl on girl or man on man relationships and yet aren't homosexual themselves.
That is morally repugnant.
---
That said, I look forward to the development of romantic relationships (as long as they're not shallow and slight) of the hetero-variety.
Actually you said that homosexual relationships are wrong in a post of yours with 4 points in it. I mean come on, I know there's the stereotype to fulfill, but you don't have to be so obviously hypocritical.
#107
Posté 26 février 2011 - 05:36
My statement targets the men who want to see girl on girl or man on man relationships and yet aren't homosexual themselves.
That is morally repugnant.
.
Somehow you find the fact of hetro people liking is repugnant, yet real homosexuals you don't find morally repugnant?
You've yet to say different. And your previous statements infact suggest what you're being flamed for.
#108
Posté 26 février 2011 - 05:37
#109
Posté 26 février 2011 - 05:37
#110
Posté 26 février 2011 - 05:37
#111
Posté 26 février 2011 - 05:37
AWWWWW YEAHHH!!!
#112
Posté 26 février 2011 - 05:37
Aesieru wrote...
I don't hate anyone... I am simply repulsed by people interested in something that they truly aren't and especially making a mockery out of it by that means.
So, I can't be interested in playing as a comic-relief elf, because I'm human?
#113
Posté 26 février 2011 - 05:37
Aesieru wrote...
Purgatious wrote...
Buddism and taoism do not condem gays in anyway shape or form.
Look at their numbers compared to majors...
Current world population ~6.9 billion
Christians~2-2.2 billion
Buddhists~1.6-1.8 billion
Buddhism is a very major religion.
Edit: Again, I apologize for off-topic. No more troll feeding on my part.
Can't wait to romance Isabella.
Modifié par Erani, 26 février 2011 - 05:39 .
#114
Posté 26 février 2011 - 05:37
#115
Posté 26 février 2011 - 05:37
I have no need to really restate anything, if you actually want to see the truth, my statements make a logical line to the reality, otherwise keep up your flaming...
Humorous.
#116
Posté 26 février 2011 - 05:38
#117
Posté 26 février 2011 - 05:38
Aesieru wrote...
Incorrect, all Christianity believes the Bible... we can go into Catholicism if you like but they are extremely anti-homosexual. You aren't a Christian if you don't believe in God's Word... that's the basic definition of that religion.
I do not remember the Chant of Light saying anything about prohibitions against hot lesbian sex with sexy pirate ladies. I guess Andraste and the Maker are cool with it.
#118
Posté 26 février 2011 - 05:39
#119
Posté 26 février 2011 - 05:39
TeenZombie wrote...
Aesieru wrote...
Incorrect, all Christianity believes the Bible... we can go into Catholicism if you like but they are extremely anti-homosexual. You aren't a Christian if you don't believe in God's Word... that's the basic definition of that religion.
I do not remember the Chant of Light saying anything about prohibitions against hot lesbian sex with sexy pirate ladies. I guess Andraste and the Maker are cool with it.
Actually the Chantry religion was based on Christianity, so I'd imagine it has the same beliefs.
#120
Posté 26 février 2011 - 05:39
Awwwwwwwwwwww Yeahhhhhhhhhhh!
#121
Posté 26 février 2011 - 05:39
Aesieru wrote...
Oh in Heavens...
Edit:
Also, you cannot be a Christian and pick and choose what you believe... anyone who is a Christian believes the Bible to be fact, else they aren't a Christian, and homosexuality is... well unfortunately for the people who think they're Christian but disagree, a damnation, and I believe they used the term "abomination". Shall I quote scripture? I see no reason to further this... my whole statement was taking out of meaning and the flamers can on and incorrectly classified me any numerous amount of things.
That is ridiculous and patently untrue.
Most of Christianity picks and chooses which parts of the bible to believe.
The Catholic Church tells its members as a matter of course to ignore the Old Testament where the New Testament conflicts with it.
I am sorry but you can not believe in and follow/adhere to every single instruction, directive, moral judgement, or whatever in the bible because they often conflict and contradict itself at various stages.
Most Churches now say that the Bible is a moral guideline and not to be followed word for word.
Not to mention in recent years many retranslations of old hebrew and latin bibles into modern english show that the current "translation" of the bible that most churches use were wrongly translated and many of the things in it are untrue.
In particular the story about Sodom and Gahmorrah referring to homosexuality over debauchery and adultery which it originally referenced; and the accusations about Mary Magdalene being a prostitute when she was in actual fact a Disciple and Jesus' wife.
There are many things in the good book that are not intended to be taken literally; and one uses owns on heart and moral compass to decide which parts these are. ALL Church institutions now say this.
And as someone else said this is not the place for you to air such disgusting and morally repugnant opinions. There was no need to for you to say what you said in such terms; and I doubt that you have any gay or transexual friends because I doubt any gay would be friends with such a blatant and appalling homophobe like you.
I actually feel sorry for you that you are actually that wilfully blind to yourself.
EDIT:
Also The Chantry is nothing like Christianity or the Christian Churches.
It is far more tolerant for a start.
Additionally it has been established in lore that the Chantry does not have a problem with homosexual relationships as long as they are just that, monogamous relationships.
Being governed by the more sensible female sex is probably the reason why.
Modifié par FitScotGaymer, 26 février 2011 - 05:41 .
#122
Posté 26 février 2011 - 05:39
Aesieru wrote...
Everything got misinterpreted because people just want to rage at anything they think is legalistic... Agh.
Ugh...
My statement targets the men who want to see girl on girl or man on man relationships and yet aren't homosexual themselves.
That is morally repugnant.
---
That said, I look forward to the development of romantic relationships (as long as they're not shallow and slight) of the hetero-variety.
Do you own a passport or have ever left the USA?
#123
Posté 26 février 2011 - 05:40
Confused-Shepard wrote...
Considering the sex scenes this time around are FULLY NUDE with careful camera angles but still showing some breast and maybe some ass....
AWWWWW YEAHHH!!!
Hold on stop the thread...? REALLY?
#124
Posté 26 février 2011 - 05:40
Aesieru wrote...
FitScotGaymer wrote...
Aesieru wrote...
Purgatious wrote...
Aesieru wrote...
While it's disgusting and morally repugnant...
The worse thing is that it's a guy playing the girl-character having lesbian sex...
Not even a proper homosexual... Gosh.
A sentiment most lesbians feel about you I would imagine.
And most people reading your garbage posts.
Do I need to invoke the entire billions that make up Christianity?
No? Really... they outnumber you and your juvenile response?
My point was that it was morally repugnant (by definition it is in established religions) and was disgusting to me (my opinion and the greater opinion of the world).
The worst thing was it wasn't even a real homosexual having it, but a person playing a sick fantasy.
Reported for hate speech.
I am not a lesbian but I take great offense to this.
Then you completely mis-understood?
Allow me to explain simply.
1. I could understand how a lesbian would find it intriguing and enjoyable to have a sexual relationship with a girl in a game, that makes sense. The same can be said for a homosexual about another guy in a game; however, when it's just a heterosexual playing out a false and twisted fantasy for them, on the likes of them watching porn... it's pretty pathetic and morally repugnant.
2. You can say what you want, but despite what you THINK people's opinions of it are, all major religions are still against it, and damn it to hell no matter what.
3. I am not Amish or any strange sect... I am the very basic sect.
4. It is not hate-speech to say that I am morally repulsed by people doing this, and by the fact that the topic thread was a guy talking about a girl on girl relationship, which was just to sate his sick fantasies.
Read the bold font. You say that major religions are against homosexuality. You are Christian, and I'm guessing Catholic. Therefore you did say that homsexuality is wrong.
#125
Posté 26 février 2011 - 05:40
I just wanted to express my admiration of Isabela's hawtness *tear*




Ce sujet est fermé
Retour en haut







