I'm sorry but it appears that people have gone back in time, watched every major 16th century battle and have become experts in medieval combat.
Seriously. Since when does any Western RPG give us 'real' combat. DA:O was no different. There is no such thing as 'realistic' combat in any game.
I think people get the picture that swords weighed 50kg and it took 10 seconds to swing one. Or that every battle was an amazing duel to the death. Fantasy is fantasy, there are certain realistic aspects to Western RPGs, but you cannot bash DA2 for having 'non realistic' combat then praise DA:O for it's 'realistic' combat. Both have their pros and cons. DA:O didn't go over the top, DA2 does. But to judge a game for one single flaw? Why do I still play Morrowind? Or Gothic 3? Because they are good games.
Combat is as relevant to an RPG for me as Graphics, they score pretty low. Look at Planescape: Torment, how many people can say it had the best combat ever made? Not many. But how many people can say, it had the best writing in an RPG ever? Quite a few.
I'm sure DA2 will be a good game, but please, if your going to whine about anything, don't let it be about 'realism'.
Modifié par simfamSP, 27 février 2011 - 04:11 .





Guest_simfamUP_*
Retour en haut






