Aller au contenu

Photo

Gamestar review: "Main quest takes 12-15 hours".


519 réponses à ce sujet

#1
GreenSoda

GreenSoda
  • Members
  • 1 214 messages
Some other tidbits from the popular German pc-magazine (minor spoilers), copied from elsewhere:

- Sub-header: Dragon Age 2 is a first class RPG, but not quite as good as its superb predecessor. This has multiple reasons.

-EA did not let them use their own screenshots for the article without
explicit approval, even though they were given the final version. The
reviewer calls this "inexplicable". Hence, the article uses a few stock screenshots and
generally shows nothing even remotely new.

- If you choose not to import and use one of the 3 predefined "lore backgrounds" instead, the
backstory is explained in a short cutscene of the final moments
(Landsmeet+Archdemon fight) of DA:O.

- cameos: Alistair is available for an "inconsequential" 1-2 minute long chat if you imported the right DA:O ending

- the prologue is described the same way as the demo

-quest samples: break into a house at night to retrieve the will of
Hawke's father, save a woman from her abusive husband, hunt an
Abomination, and decide whether to turn in a dude using blood magic to
impress his girlfriend

- Hawke has up to 9 companions, who
generally feel alive and responsive. However, they have consistently
less depth and weaker characterization than the cast in Origins. The
only exception is Varric, whose frequent banter with Cassandra provides
much of the game's tension and humour. He's described as "a d*mn cool
sock" (don't ask)

- Main Quest takes 12-15 hours, you can double that number "if you take your time and explore everything the game has to offer".

-The game does not feel long or epic, and the central conflict (mages
vs. chantry) is not as dramatic as the reviewer would have liked. But
although it doesn't have anything comparable to the Battle of Ostagar or
the final attack on Denerim, it still has some very tactical boss
fights.

- ugly ("texture mud") and low-polygon graphics, especially in the areas outside of Kirkwall.
Generally feeling of emptiness/lack of NPCs. Constant encounters with
"clonecellars" and "clonecaves", which can be a huge source of
frustration. However, beautiful spell effects and good character models
that can graphically compete with ME2.

- combat is generally tactical, though frequently unbalanced. The lack of an iso-style camera
was a huge problem for the reviewer.

- The number of talents is huge. The game offers class specific weapons and some crafting options.
However, overall you generally have a small selection. (they don't
expand on this)

- The ending is described as open ended and unresolved .

- final rating is 87%. "Although the fans' fears have partially come true, this is still a magnificent RPG"

Small update:

Full score

Graphic:7/10

+ detailed characters
+great animations+nice spell effects
-surroundings have little polygons and details
-textures often seem "muddy"

Sound:9/10

+dynamic orchestra music
+suiting fighting sounds
+good English voice actors
-not all parts are cast well in German

Balance:9/10

+four difficulties
+easy access
+fight are always fair
+talents and classes are well balanced
-difficulty can change during the campaign

Atmosphere:9/10

+fantastic cutscenes and dialogs
+dark brutal fantasy world
-recycled areas
-often lifeless landscapes

Controls:8/10

+free saving
+easy to use UI
-hard aiming due to no tactical view
-needlessly complicated menu

Content:8/10

+long campaign
+high replayability
+many main and side quests
-few areas
-restricted on being human

Story/Quests:9/10

+very thrilling, varied quests
+nice surprises
+often different solutions
-story lacks epicness
-open ended

Fighting system:10/10

+tactical but not to complex
+many specialisations possible
+interesting boss battles
+many different talent trees

Character development:9/10

+partly distinctive, multi layered NPC companions
+fast and dynamic
+many options during dialog
-it is seldom necessary to use companions in dialog

Items:9/10

+countless spells and talent
+class specific weapons and armor
+crafting
-little choice overall


Modifié par GreenSoda, 26 février 2011 - 08:39 .


#2
v_ware

v_ware
  • Members
  • 848 messages
12 to 15 hours?

#3
JrayM16

JrayM16
  • Members
  • 1 817 messages
Emphasis on "Take your time and explore everything the game has to offer."



Without that, Even Origins could be completed in minimal time.

#4
Covi

Covi
  • Members
  • 139 messages
How long is ME2's main quest? 6 hours?

Modifié par Covi, 26 février 2011 - 07:45 .


#5
Purple People Eater

Purple People Eater
  • Members
  • 1 382 messages
The review is old news, but thanks anyway.

#6
upsettingshorts

upsettingshorts
  • Members
  • 13 950 messages
How long did it take them to play DAO's mainquest? All the content?

How about ME1-2?

Self-reported playthrough hours need context as they are highly subjective and reliant on a number of factors. In isolation they are so wildly inconsistent as to be useless.

#7
My Avatar is a Lizard

My Avatar is a Lizard
  • Members
  • 1 044 messages
I think this is the Average gamer quest time,



Origins took me 23

ME2 took me 13

#8
Wissenschaft

Wissenschaft
  • Members
  • 1 607 messages
Origins can be beaten within 30 hours if you rush through it. If DA2 is half the length then I can easily see being able to beat it within 15 hours.



That still means that at my normal playing speed, the game will likely last 40 to 60 hours for me.

#9
SG60

SG60
  • Members
  • 268 messages
So basically it takes 12 - 15 hours if you ignore all the sidequests and optional things?

#10
Wittand25

Wittand25
  • Members
  • 1 602 messages
Gamestar gives DA2 an average playing time of 30 hours, and they said that DA:O has a playing time of 40 hours so you can compare the times.

#11
Demo-Mike

Demo-Mike
  • Members
  • 149 messages
With all the complaints they ahve i think they went easy on it.



I knew from the begining it wont be better than Origins, but the review is good.

#12
Vicious

Vicious
  • Members
  • 3 221 messages

Covi wrote...

How long is ME2's main quest? 6 hours?



#13
DrunkenMonkey

DrunkenMonkey
  • Members
  • 710 messages
you could complete DA O in 15 hours.

#14
Haasth

Haasth
  • Members
  • 4 412 messages
Hmm... Well it took me about 20 hours to get through my first Origin playthrough and that was with doing 9/10 things. 
And yet I still spent way over 200 hours on this game. 

#15
GreenSoda

GreenSoda
  • Members
  • 1 214 messages

Purple People Eater wrote...

The review is old news, but thanks anyway.

The final rating is a week old -the content of the article summarized above is new.

Modifié par GreenSoda, 26 février 2011 - 07:49 .


#16
Anord

Anord
  • Members
  • 25 messages
i completed dao in 18 hours with no side quests done but with side quests it takes 20+ depending on how many u do

Modifié par Anord, 26 février 2011 - 07:50 .


#17
Rune-Chan

Rune-Chan
  • Members
  • 1 054 messages
Sounds worrying overall with what they say, although I no longer take game magazine reviews particularly seriously, not after GTA4 was given 10/10.

#18
JrayM16

JrayM16
  • Members
  • 1 817 messages

Upsettingshorts wrote...

How long did it take them to play DAO's mainquest? All the content?
How about ME1-2?
Self-reported playthrough hours need context as they are highly subjective and reliant on a number of factors. In isolation they are so wildly inconsistent as to be useless.


This.

#19
Anathemic

Anathemic
  • Members
  • 2 361 messages
Mages vs Chantry huh?

#20
Erika T

Erika T
  • Members
  • 233 messages
The fastest I've beaten origins was 13 hours, just for the sake of it, with a human mage, but that was leliana stealthing her way through almost every dungeon, and me "magicing" the rest of the team next to her with hold position/move freely. And I flicked through dialogies at the speed of light. other than this i did not cheat.



avegare playthrough for me is 30 hours, longest 45.

#21
Demo-Mike

Demo-Mike
  • Members
  • 149 messages

Machines Are Us wrote...

Sounds worrying overall with what they say, although I no longer take game magazine reviews particularly seriously, not after GTA4 was given 10/10.


Everyyone gave GTA IV 10/10

#22
FieryDove

FieryDove
  • Members
  • 2 634 messages
Some of the review is depressing. (To me) We'll see soon enough. Thanks for posting.

#23
AkiKishi

AkiKishi
  • Members
  • 10 898 messages
Seriously ?

I see a snowjob in the works.

And how the hell do you get an 87 from that review? Boggles the mind.

Modifié par BobSmith101, 26 février 2011 - 07:53 .


#24
Demo-Mike

Demo-Mike
  • Members
  • 149 messages

FieryDove wrote...

Some of the review is depressing. (To me) We'll see soon enough. Thanks for posting.


It's everything i found wrong in the demo confirmd to be in the full game.

I don't understand how the score is that high. Maybe poster only made bad stuff from review in the post?

#25
Rune-Chan

Rune-Chan
  • Members
  • 1 054 messages

Demo-Mike wrote...

Machines Are Us wrote...

Sounds worrying overall with what they say, although I no longer take game magazine reviews particularly seriously, not after GTA4 was given 10/10.


Everyyone gave GTA IV 10/10


Who is everyone? I assume you mean the media, and that is basically my point.