519 réponses à ce sujet

[Fishy]

Anyway relax people . .Take my little green bag .. Here .. Take a puff.

Modifié par Suprez30, 26 février 2011 - 08:23 .

[Big Mabels Diet-Plan]

People just will not accept anything negative said about this game, it's patheric. Every game has flaws and DA2 will be no exception.

The more information that comes to light the more this forums reaction resembles the seven stages of grief and right about now we're past shock and denial up to "Mass Effect 2 took 6 hours" levels of bull**** bargaining.

hahahaha

[DarthKaldriss]

PC Gamer Uk gave it 94% and was quite enthused by the game.
However I expect certain 'people' on these forums to start shouting down this as EA/Bioware having paid off all the game mags.

[TheCreeper]

Twaddlefish wrote...

If DA2 only takes you 12-15 hours (on the first play through and don't know where stuff is), you've seriously missed the point of a Bioware RPG.

Yeah, even in ME2 you spend a large amount of time doing side-quests (and mining, but that's a different issue) Rushing through A Bioware RPG is like trying to win at Paranoia (Tabletop RPG, look it up)

[Demo-Mike]

Amioran wrote...

Demo-Mike wrote...

Two worlds 2 took me 50 hours with side-quests.

Again, it doesn't really matters if what you do is all the same.

Demo-Mike wrote...
It's a pretty world, full of life, and not bored because i was mage and warrior at same time. I think Two WOrlds 2 underrated people should try. 

I tried it but I cannot see how one should really think that game "full of life". The fact that you can both be a warrior and a mage at the same time doesn't change content. Quests are all the same; you do one you know all the rest.

Then weren't you complaining about DA2 being too "actiony"? TW2 has combos! Now, this is funny.

Demo-Mike wrote...
but I'm saying it looks better visually and it's longer (crap story but thats writting department), why is DA II look like less effor game when it's made by RPG masters, big budget stuff.

Better graphics? TW2? Sometimes I'm amazed at the taste of people. Without entering on this, however, you cannot paragonate the technical design of DA2 to the one of TW2. The models seems drawn from a 5 years old child. I think I can do better models with just my left hand, seriously. I don't know your knowledge on the matter, but, just to be sure, look on an anatomical book, see a drawing made by a child and compare the two. You will immediately notice what's wrong on the technical design of models in TW2.

Oh, well...

You haven't played all of it yet you know that its all the same and repetetive?

And bioware has huge boobs and small legs, wrong anatomy as well. Anatomy aside, Two Worlds 2 just looks better, i dont think you can deny that.

[Anathemic]

TomHark wrote...

Anathemic wrote...

Twaddlefish wrote...

If DA2 only takes you 12-15 hours (on the first play through and don't know where stuff is), you've seriously missed the point of a Bioware RPG.

Mass Effect 2 would like a word with you

Yes, it wants to say that you are only a third of the way through the game.

I beat Mass Effect 2 buddy (I think it shows acheivements on profile does it not?)

Either way, Mass Effect 2 was incredibly short for me, now even reaching the 15 hour mark

[ajbry]

If you blaze through the game in 12-15 hours (which is clearly below the expected length, even if you go with the lower estimates), wouldn't the characterization and depth of the story suffer in turn? How well are you going to get to know your companions if you finish the game that soon? Not very well... regardless of how substantial they may be.



This review seems horribly unbalanced, and the result of a rushed playthrough.

[Demo-Mike]

I odn't think review rushed the main story, he just says it takes 12-15 hours.

[Anathemic]

TripedWire wrote...

People just will not accept anything negative said about this game, it's patheric. Every game has flaws and DA2 will be no exception.
The more information that comes to light the more this forums reaction resembles the seven stages of grief and right about now we're past shock and denial up to "Mass Effect 2 took 6 hours" levels of bull**** bargaining.
hahahaha

Don't you love it?

[falconlord5]

Anathemic wrote...

falconlord5 wrote...

You'd think, that by this point, everybody here would know instantly that any and all reviews, are total bull****.

You'd think.

I'm only paying attention to the part that states main conflict is Chantry vs Mages

Well, yeah. That's what they told us at the very beginning of development. If you haven't figure that the main conflict of the game is between Magi and Chantry...

[Wittand25]

Demo-Mike wrote...

"87 is a great score. Not every game will score a 90+"

Yes but they bring up a lot of negative comments.

This sucks, that sucks, it isn't better than origins but it's good.

Why 87?

Why TC don't post positives?

Full score
Graphic:7/10
+ detailed characters
+great animations+nice spell effects
-surroundings have little polygons and details
-textures often seem "muddy"
Sound:9/10
+dynamic orchestra music
+suiting fighting sounds
+good English voice actors
-not all parts are cast well in German
Balance:9/10
+four difficulties
+easy access
+fight are always fair
+talents and classes are well balanced
-difficulty can change during the campaign
Atmosphere:9/10
+fantastic cutscenes and dialogs
+dark brutal fantasy world
-recycled areas
-often lifeless landscapes
Controls:8/10
+free saving
+easy to use UI
-hard aiming due to no tactical view
-needlessly complicated menu
Content:8/10
long campaign
+high replayability
many main and side quests
-few areas
-restricted on being human
Story/Quests:9/10
+very thrilling, varied quests
+nice surprises
+often different solutions
-story lacks epicness
-open ended
Fighting system:10/10
+tactical but not to complex
+many specialisations possible
+interesting boss battles
+many different talent trees
Character development:9/10
+partly distinctive, multi layered NPC companions
+fast and dynamic
+many options during dialog
-it is seldom necessary to use companions in dialog
Items:9/10
-countless spells and talents
+class specific weapons and armor
+crafting
-little choice overall

Modifié par Wittand25, 26 février 2011 - 08:27 .

[Demo-Mike]

"Don't you love it? "



I don't love this kind of fanboys is not healthy.

[JrayM16]

Anathemic wrote...

TomHark wrote...

Anathemic wrote...

Twaddlefish wrote...

If DA2 only takes you 12-15 hours (on the first play through and don't know where stuff is), you've seriously missed the point of a Bioware RPG.

Mass Effect 2 would like a word with you

Yes, it wants to say that you are only a third of the way through the game.

I beat Mass Effect 2 buddy (I think it shows acheivements on profile does it not?)

Either way, Mass Effect 2 was incredibly short for me, now even reaching the 15 hour mark

Well, for me it was a bit over 30 hours.

While I can't say this was the cause of your short playthrough, I would like to take this opportunity to point out that a lot of ME2's prime content was optional.(All the loyalty missions).  I really respected it for taht, especially since some major choices were there.

[Drowsy0106]

guis it have boob lots of explosion and maybi even lazor, i dont see prob?

[Darkeus]

Suprez30 wrote...

Anyway relax people . .Take my little green bag .. Here .. Take a puff.

Hey, I am all about that!!  

[Demo-Mike]

Wittand25 wrote...

Demo-Mike wrote...

"87 is a great score. Not every game will score a 90+"

Yes but they bring up a lot of negative comments.

This sucks, that sucks, it isn't better than origins but it's good.

Why 87?

Why TC don't post positives?

Full score
Graphic:7/10
+ detailed characters
+great animations+nice spell effects
-surroundings have little polygons and details
-textures often seem "muddy"
Sound:9/10
+dynamic orchestra music
+suiting fighting sounds
+good English voice actors
-not all parts are cast well in German
Balance:9/10
+four difficulties
+easy access
+fight are always fair
+talents and classes are well balanced
-difficulty can change during the campaign
Atmosphere:9/10
+fantastic cutscenes and dialogs
+dark brutal fantasy world
-recycled areas
-often lifeless landscapes
Controls:8/10
+free saving
+easy to use UI
-hard aiming due to no tactical view
-needlessly complicated menu
Content:8/10
long campaign
+high replayability
many main and side quests
-few areas
-restricted on being human
Story/Quests:9/10
+very thrilling, varied quests
+nice surprises
+often different solutions
-story lacks epicness
-open ended
Fighting system:10/10
+tactical but not to complex
+many specialisations possible
+interesting boss battles
+many different talent trees
Character development:9/10
+partly distinctive, multi layered NPC companions
+fast and dynamic
+many options during dialog
-it is seldom necessary to use companions in dialog
Items:9/10
-countless spells and talent
+class specific weapons and armor
+crafting
-little choice overall

Lost of positives and negatives thank you

[Anathemic]

falconlord5 wrote...

Anathemic wrote...

falconlord5 wrote...

You'd think, that by this point, everybody here would know instantly that any and all reviews, are total bull****.

You'd think.

I'm only paying attention to the part that states main conflict is Chantry vs Mages

Well, yeah. That's what they told us at the very beginning of development. If you haven't figure that the main conflict of the game is between Magi and Chantry...

And I'm comparing this to that one leaked fake-spoiler thread from 4-chan

[ajbry]

Wittand25 wrote...
Content:8/10
long campain
+high replaybility
many main and side quests
-few areas
-restricted on beeing human
Story/Quests:9/10
+very thrilling, varied quests
+nice surprises
+often different solutions
-story lacks epicness
-open ended
Character development:9/10
+partly distinktive, multi layered NPC companions
+fast and dynamic
+many options during dialog
-it is seldom necessary to use companions in dialog

This all seems very contradictory to the initial post, lol.

Thanks for posting the list.

Modifié par ajbry, 26 février 2011 - 08:29 .

[falconlord5]

Anathemic wrote...

falconlord5 wrote...

Anathemic wrote...

falconlord5 wrote...

You'd think, that by this point, everybody here would know instantly that any and all reviews, are total bull****.

You'd think.

I'm only paying attention to the part that states main conflict is Chantry vs Mages

Well, yeah. That's what they told us at the very beginning of development. If you haven't figure that the main conflict of the game is between Magi and Chantry...

And I'm comparing this to that one leaked fake-spoiler thread from 4-chan

If you're comparing a review to a spoiler you know is fake...

[Roseking]

 I did a play through of ME of in 12 hours, could have been faster on an easy. The point is not to rush RPGs, take your time and explore. 

[Demo-Mike]

Drowsy0106 wrote...

guis it have boob lots of explosion and maybi even lazor, i dont see prob?

mock my bad english, i'm redownloading spell check

[Drowsy0106]

Suprez30 wrote...

Anyway relax people . .Take my little green bag .. Here .. Take a puff.

Your a true friend! 

[AkiKishi]

DarthKaldriss wrote...

PC Gamer Uk gave it 94% and was quite enthused by the game.
However I expect certain 'people' on these forums to start shouting down this as EA/Bioware having paid off all the game mags.

It's not quite like that. But if you want advertising,exclusives etc. You have to stay on good terms with the publishers.

Its an inherently corrupt system.

[JrayM16]

ajbry wrote...

Wittand25 wrote...
Content:8/10
long campain
+high replaybility
many main and side quests
-few areas
-restricted on beeing human
Story/Quests:9/10
+very thrilling, varied quests
+nice surprises
+often different solutions
-story lacks epicness
-open ended
Character development:9/10
+partly distinktive, multi layered NPC companions
+fast and dynamic
+many options during dialog
-it is seldom necessary to use companions in dialog

This all seems very contradictory, lol.

Hmm.  Some of it.  When you break it down though it seems fairly consistent.

[magicwins]

Anathemic wrote...

TripedWire wrote...

People just will not accept anything negative said about this game, it's patheric. Every game has flaws and DA2 will be no exception.
The more information that comes to light the more this forums reaction resembles the seven stages of grief and right about now we're past shock and denial up to "Mass Effect 2 took 6 hours" levels of bull**** bargaining.
hahahaha

Don't you love it?

You people disgust me. Really.