I agree that it's murder but not evil in the most logical sense. As it does have some logical merit to it, as frail as it is. But that's what makes it one of my few if not only complaint about the whole story from what I've played so far. So don't get me wrong when I get on this rant.
A) First of all, is the secrecy. All that was said was it's "Dangerous", but not life or death dangerous in a single moment. Where it's adhering to the Frediuan philosophy going along the lines of "You must consume the dragon and not become it, in order to become stronger than it". The Warning of "No Turning Back" or even the wilderness outing, doesn't prepare one mentally for that at all.

Jory was the one responding in defense to the ritual.
C) I think most of all: the Grey Wardens contradict both themselves as humans and their philosophy, when they choose to kill one of their kind in order to make sure that they keep their secret safe. Because they then become no better than the monsters that they're fighting against - sacrifices needed or not.
As sacrifices should be made by the individuals themselves - and when they have all of the info in hand: not by one of leading authorities of the group who deftly keeps the information hidden from them until the very end.
D) When getting to the gamplay side of it: It simply forces you to adhere to these fallacies.
E) When rolling in the "If" factors, if the game allowed to you stop duncan, convincing Jory to keep his secret would've been a choice. For I don't think he would've told anyone since he would be so grateful to live his life with his family - blight ravaging the land or not.
Those are just my thoughts on the matter.
Edit: Sorry about the numerous mistakes, I edited a lot out - and I'm a little sleepy .
Modifié par ToranagaX, 15 novembre 2009 - 08:37 .