6641 réponses à ce sujet

[tankgirly]

Alanosborn1991 wrote...

Can someone please answer my questions

Which one?

The second one, yes, that's basically it. From what we've known, either you saved your mother or your siblings, no middle ground this time.

[Giga Drill BREAKER]

i dunno if I will be able to side with the templers, what they want is just to extreme, but what Anders done is unforgivable, I vote to kill them all

Modifié par DinoSteve, 07 mars 2011 - 06:50 .

[werewoof]

As much as I love Anders, I'm kinda disappointed that both of the m/m romance options are rather depressing. Anders is all screwed up in the head, Fenris seems like a brooding, mage-hating douche...sigh. I'm going to miss Zevran, he was so cheerful most of the time.

But I haven't played the game yet, so I guess I'm not in any place to judge Anders or Fenris just yet. Just, from what I've seen, Anders will break my heart and Fenris will ****** me off.

[Tamyn]

Yay you can still get an Alistair cameo if he's not king or a drunkard.

[ReD BaKen9]

What if alistars harden or not same with lilieana anything diff?

[raziel3080]

tankgirly wrote...

Alanosborn1991 wrote...

Can someone please answer my questions

Which one?

The second one, yes, that's basically it. From what we've known, either you saved your mother or your siblings, no middle ground this time.

I think it was mentioned earlier in thread that your sibling leaves for either the templars or circle befoee your mother is kipnapped...as I think you would run into them later and they would know nothing of what happened to her...as well as also being rellay upset over what has happened...

I could be wrong but I thought I saw klace mention something about that...and how he tried to save her...but was still too late... I could be wrong though...the site went to hell right after that...

*who would have thought getting the strategy guide would be hlpful to the story n LI situations of the game...where as I was only getting it so, I would know where I would be getting all the badass loot( weapons/armor n accessories) from...

Modifié par raziel3080, 07 mars 2011 - 07:03 .

[TeamLexana]

Is their a Mana Clash esq spell this time? I'm was playing DAO earlier and decided to go without Wynne or Morrigan for awhile and god damn, I forgot how pesky enemy spellcasters are, lol. I swear the only times I've died so far is because I got zapped with curse of mortality or crushing prison, Alistair's Holy Smite just doesn't compete with Mana Clash against mages. Sadness.

[tankgirly]

Tamyn wrote...

Yay you can still get an Alistair cameo if he's not king or a drunkard.

Yeah, we were told about that only last page, exciting news! Apprently it will be him who saved Caver/Bethany in the Deep Road! Hurray!

[razzy1319]

raziel3080 wrote...

tankgirly wrote...

Alanosborn1991 wrote...

Can someone please answer my questions

Which one?

The second one, yes, that's basically it. From what we've known, either you saved your mother or your siblings, no middle ground this time.

I think it was mentioned earlier in thread that your sibling leaves for either the templars or circle befoee your mother is kipnapped...as I think you would run into them later and they would know nothing of what happened to her...as well as also being rellay upset over what has happened...

I could be wrong but I thought I saw klace mention something about that...and how he tried to save her...but was still too late... I could be wrong though...the site went to hell right after that...

Yep. I think thats right. YOU CANT CANT CANT SAVE YOUR MOTHER according to Klace

[TeamLexana]

razzy1319 wrote...

raziel3080 wrote...

tankgirly wrote...

Alanosborn1991 wrote...

Can someone please answer my questions

Which one?

The second one, yes, that's basically it. From what we've known, either you saved your mother or your siblings, no middle ground this time.

I think it was mentioned earlier in thread that your sibling leaves for either the templars or circle befoee your mother is kipnapped...as I think you would run into them later and they would know nothing of what happened to her...as well as also being rellay upset over what has happened...

I could be wrong but I thought I saw klace mention something about that...and how he tried to save her...but was still too late... I could be wrong though...the site went to hell right after that...

Yep. I think thats right. YOU CANT CANT CANT SAVE YOUR MOTHER according to Klace

Well I hope they make her more likable before she dies or I won't be sad at all. Momma Hawke pissed me off in the demo, nowhere near as BadAss as Momma Cousland.

[slumlord722]

Using violence like that to force a change is no real change at all, just a switch between the oppressed and the oppressor.

The thing that really gets me most of all is that by doing such a horrible destructive thing, Anders is single-handedly proving the Chantry mantra of "all it takes is one" that they use to oppress mages in the first place.


One mage. One. One blew up an entire cathedral using magic in conjunction with demons.

It's funny - I was ambivalent before - I saw both sides of the argument. The mages don't want to be oppressed, and the Chantry doesn't want rogue mages.

I don't think anything could of convinced me more that all mages need to be kept on a tight leash - cut off from the world and locked away - better than what he did.

And that's the opposite of what he wanted.

[tankgirly]

slumlord722 wrote...

Using violence like that to force a change is no real change at all, just a switch between the oppressed and the oppressor.

The thing that really gets me most of all is that by doing such a horrible destructive thing, Anders is single-handedly proving the Chantry mantra of "all it takes is one" that they use to oppress mages in the first place.


One mage. One. One blew up an entire cathedral using magic in conjunction with demons.

It's funny - I was ambivalent before - I saw both sides of the argument. The mages don't want to be oppressed, and the Chantry doesn't want rogue mages.

I don't think anything could of convinced me more that all mages need to be kept on a tight leash - cut off from the world and locked away - better than what he did.

And that's the opposite of what he wanted.

Reflect a lot on what we have in the real world, that action, no?

[Calla S]

slumlord722 wrote...
Using violence like that to force a change is no real change at all, just a switch between the oppressed and the oppressor.

The thing that really gets me most of all is that by doing such a horrible destructive thing, Anders is single-handedly proving the Chantry mantra of "all it takes is one" that they use to oppress mages in the first place.


One mage. One. One blew up an entire cathedral using magic in conjunction with demons.

It's funny - I was ambivalent before - I saw both sides of the argument. The mages don't want to be oppressed, and the Chantry doesn't want rogue mages.

I don't think anything could of convinced me more that all mages need to be kept on a tight leash - cut off from the world and locked away - better than what he did.

And that's the opposite of what he wanted.

This, exactly. Though it's far more eloquent that I could've managed. It's late, and I have a bad case of the dumb when it hits this hour. Anders wanted freedom for the mages and to be recognized as the man who set the workings in motion, but all he did was show the Maker-fearing people of Thedas what mages are capable of, destroying a Chantry full of innocents to prove a point.

Ugh. I can't believe it. Anders was my second favorite character in Awakening. Justice was my first. This... messes all of that up.

[Dirty Whore]

tankgirly wrote...

slumlord722 wrote...

Using violence like that to force a change is no real change at all, just a switch between the oppressed and the oppressor.

The thing that really gets me most of all is that by doing such a horrible destructive thing, Anders is single-handedly proving the Chantry mantra of "all it takes is one" that they use to oppress mages in the first place.


One mage. One. One blew up an entire cathedral using magic in conjunction with demons.

It's funny - I was ambivalent before - I saw both sides of the argument. The mages don't want to be oppressed, and the Chantry doesn't want rogue mages.

I don't think anything could of convinced me more that all mages need to be kept on a tight leash - cut off from the world and locked away - better than what he did.

And that's the opposite of what he wanted.

Anders aim was not to make things better for mages, but to FORCE A CONFLICT between mages and the establishment...Victory or death, he didn't care, he just wanted the stalemate broken.

at least, thats what he said his motive was.

Modifié par Dirty Whore, 07 mars 2011 - 07:17 .

[TeamLexana]

I'm totally going rival with Anders and offing him when he blows up the chantry. I've killed pixel peeps for less, muwhahahaha.

[leggywillow]

We really, really need some "Goddamnit, Anders" banners.

[TobiTobsen]

Goddamnit Anders. You asked for it! Lawful Neutral justice is coming your way! I AM THE LAW!

[Dirty Whore]

Well, Isabella threatens Holy war with the Qun to save her own ass and Merril causes Dalish Genocide...not a good day for Romance

[TeamLexana]

Maybe if the Chantry was empty but to blow it up when it's full of innocent peeps is just too disturbing to me. I don't want any terrorists in my party. Assassin's, Blood Mages, Qunari, Golems, fine fine, welcome aboard. Terrorists? Oh hells no.

[The Big Nothing]

Anders was the vanguard; he was showing that mages will no longer abide Chantry law.
The Chantry should fear the mages that they have created.

[Dirty Whore]

and the thing is that after seeing the Grand Cleric in game I must say she is THE ONLY reasonable and actually quite decent woman in the whole game!

Modifié par Dirty Whore, 07 mars 2011 - 07:24 .

[mordy_was_here]

TeamLexana wrote...

Maybe if the Chantry was empty but to blow it up when it's full of innocent peeps is just too disturbing to me. I don't want any terrorists in my party. Assassin's, Blood Mages, Qunari, Golems, fine fine, welcome aboard. Terrorists? Oh hells no.

Yep, kinda how I feel at the moment. You want to blow up an empty Chantry to prove that you can do it, fine. Don't go killing innocents to prove a point.

Meh, I'll wait until I've seen the whole thing is played out to decide whether or not I'm going to kill him, but even my mages will be put out with that display.

[Giga Drill BREAKER]

tankgirly wrote...

slumlord722 wrote...

Using violence like that to force a change is no real change at all, just a switch between the oppressed and the oppressor.

The thing that really gets me most of all is that by doing such a horrible destructive thing, Anders is single-handedly proving the Chantry mantra of "all it takes is one" that they use to oppress mages in the first place.


One mage. One. One blew up an entire cathedral using magic in conjunction with demons.

It's funny - I was ambivalent before - I saw both sides of the argument. The mages don't want to be oppressed, and the Chantry doesn't want rogue mages.

I don't think anything could of convinced me more that all mages need to be kept on a tight leash - cut off from the world and locked away - better than what he did.

And that's the opposite of what he wanted.

Reflect a lot on what we have in the real world, that action, no?

Do you sleep?


Also when was the last summary?

[slumlord722]

Dirty **** wrote...

and the thing is that after seeing the Grand Cleric in game I must say she is THE ONLY reasonable and actually quite decent woman in the whole game!

Which is probably why she dies. Tends to happen in real life, too.

[tankgirly]

DinoSteve wrote...

tankgirly wrote...

slumlord722 wrote...

Using violence like that to force a change is no real change at all, just a switch between the oppressed and the oppressor.

The thing that really gets me most of all is that by doing such a horrible destructive thing, Anders is single-handedly proving the Chantry mantra of "all it takes is one" that they use to oppress mages in the first place.


One mage. One. One blew up an entire cathedral using magic in conjunction with demons.

It's funny - I was ambivalent before - I saw both sides of the argument. The mages don't want to be oppressed, and the Chantry doesn't want rogue mages.

I don't think anything could of convinced me more that all mages need to be kept on a tight leash - cut off from the world and locked away - better than what he did.

And that's the opposite of what he wanted.

Reflect a lot on what we have in the real world, that action, no?

Do you sleep?


Also when was the last summary?

I live hereB)

The last summary was on 230.