1208 réponses à ce sujet

[GreenClover]

Oh, back to the topic, I say NO anyway

Modifié par GreenClover, 28 février 2011 - 09:44 .

[Ryzaki]

Upsettingshorts wrote...

Ryzaki wrote...

I mean compare this pic:

to the other image.

Why?  We've seen multiple screenshots of similar people and places that have changed wildly from build to build.  It proves nothing one way or the other.  

So somehow this pic of the final build...isn't comparable to a game of the final build that a reviewer got? 

[mesmerizedish]

Maclimes wrote...

ishmaeltheforsaken wrote...

Maclimes (is his avatar Batman? no? my logic is irrefutable)

Wait ... what? Do you think me and "My Avatar is Batman" are connected? The only connection I have with him (her?) is occasionally calling him a troll.

No, in one of his threads a while back, you asked some question and my answer was "Because his avatar is NOT Batman." You said that that logic was hard to argue with

[elirian_19]

Curse whoever made that in the TOOLSET. Curse you for getting hopes up!

[upsettingshorts]

Ryzaki wrote...

So somehow this pic of the final build...isn't comparable to a game of the final build that a reviewer got? 

What build is this from?  Are we certain that what the reviewer saw and this particular screen are from the same build, or just an event confirmed as existing by the reviewer?  Are they one in the same?  Where has this been said?

Modifié par Upsettingshorts, 28 février 2011 - 09:45 .

[Chagrinned Goat]

While overall that screenshot is good, there are a lot of little things that stand out when you look. I want it to be real, but I have significant doubts.

I'll go with my first guess. You can put me down for "Not all bi", Ishmael. I'll be pleased if I'm wrong, though.

Modifié par Chagrinned Goat, 28 février 2011 - 09:45 .

[LilyasAvalon]

Not all. If we had a different elfin female romance option, than maybe. But Merill doesn't strike me off as being bisexual.

[Ryzaki]

Upsettingshorts wrote...

Ryzaki wrote...

So somehow this pic of the final build...isn't comparable to a game of the final build that a reviewer got? 

What build is this from?  Are we certain that what the reviewer saw and this particular screen are from the same build, or just an event confirmed as existing by the reviewer?  Are they one in the same?  Where has this been said?

It hasn't which makes this more likely to be fake. 

[upsettingshorts]

Ryzaki wrote...

It hasn't which makes this more likely to be fake. 

Why? 

The only scenario of fakery that makes sense to me is that someone made a really convincing fake in DAO's toolset, and I don't buy it. 

Modifié par Upsettingshorts, 28 février 2011 - 09:45 .

[ViSeiRa]

Upsettingshorts wrote...

Ryzaki wrote...

So somehow this pic of the final build...isn't comparable to a game of the final build that a reviewer got? 

What build is this from?  Are we certain that what the reviewer saw and this particular screen are from the same build, or just an event confirmed as existing by the reviewer?  Are they one in the same?  Where has this been said?

The only scenario of fakery that makes sense to me is that someone made a really convincing fake in DAO's toolset, and I don't buy it. 

You're trying so hard , if at one point Bioware fixed the clipping issue then I doubt it'd be present in the final build sent to reviewers.

[tenshi_no_hone]

My vote is for not.

[TheGunslinger]

All Bi!
I want to romance Merrill as a female.

[mesmerizedish]

ViSeirA wrote...

Upsettingshorts wrote...

Ryzaki wrote...

So somehow this pic of the final build...isn't comparable to a game of the final build that a reviewer got? 

What build is this from?  Are we certain that what the reviewer saw and this particular screen are from the same build, or just an event confirmed as existing by the reviewer?  Are they one in the same?  Where has this been said?

The only scenario of fakery that makes sense to me is that someone made a really convincing fake in DAO's toolset, and I don't buy it. 

You're trying so hard , if at one point Bioware fixed the clipping issue then I doubt it'd be present in the final build sent to reviewers.

I don't mean to intrude, but I must say that I find it amusing that y'all think that Shorts is the one who's "trying so hard."

[upsettingshorts]

ViSeirA wrote...
You're trying so hard

That's what I think of the people reaching at minor issues to prove its fakery, when exactly the same minor issues have existed in many screenshots of multiple builds of Dragon Age 2.  Granted, I've admitted I want to believe.  I expect others are so invested in their own predictions that they want to disbelieve.  We'll see, anyway.

ViSeirA wrote...
if at one point Bioware fixed the clipping issue then I doubt it'd be present in the final build sent to reviewers.

Not necessarily.

Modifié par Upsettingshorts, 28 février 2011 - 09:47 .

[MorningBird]

Updated Poll Results:

54% No

45% Yes

Updated MorningBird Results:

*still laughing*

[ViSeiRa]

ishmaeltheforsaken wrote...

ViSeirA wrote...

Upsettingshorts wrote...

Ryzaki wrote...

So somehow this pic of the final build...isn't comparable to a game of the final build that a reviewer got? 

What build is this from?  Are we certain that what the reviewer saw and this particular screen are from the same build, or just an event confirmed as existing by the reviewer?  Are they one in the same?  Where has this been said?

The only scenario of fakery that makes sense to me is that someone made a really convincing fake in DAO's toolset, and I don't buy it. 

You're trying so hard , if at one point Bioware fixed the clipping issue then I doubt it'd be present in the final build sent to reviewers.

I don't mean to intrude, but I must say that I find it amusing that y'all think that Shorts is the one who's "trying so hard."

No, No, No... you didn't see Shorts in the 4Chan thread, that's just him being him 

[Katsaurs]

Oh god deep down I feel I'm so very very wrong but...

Put me down for all are. ALL I SAY!

Modifié par Katsaurs, 28 février 2011 - 09:50 .

[Calla S]

All bi. The different heights/bone structure in the two women would be almost impossible to repeat in the DA:O Toolset, and it doesn't look photoshopped to that extent, despite some oddities like pixelation and jaggy lines.

[Maclimes]

ishmaeltheforsaken wrote...

Maclimes wrote...

ishmaeltheforsaken wrote...

Maclimes (is his avatar Batman? no? my logic is irrefutable)

You have an INSANE memory for the off-handed comments of strangers on the internet. I salute you.

Wait ... what? Do you think me and "My Avatar is Batman" are connected? The only connection I have with him (her?) is occasionally calling him a troll.

No, in one of his threads a while back, you asked some question and my answer was "Because his avatar is NOT Batman." You said that that logic was hard to argue with

You have an INSANE memory of the off-handed comments of total strangers on the internet. I salue you!

:happy:

Modifié par Maclimes, 28 février 2011 - 09:51 .

[upsettingshorts]

ViSeirA wrote...
No, No, No... you didn't see Shorts in the 4Chan thread, that's just him being him

True enough.  Bad logic is bad logic even if the conclusion end up being correct.   That's why I don't really care if I end up right or not. 

[Ryzaki]

Upsettingshorts wrote...

Ryzaki wrote...

It hasn't which makes this more likely to be fake. 

Why? 

The only scenario of fakery that makes sense to me is that someone made a really convincing fake in DAO's toolset, and I don't buy it. 

I do. People do strange things to screw with people's heads. 

[Calla S]

Hahaha, no, the avatar isn't of me. I'm glad you approve, though!

[Ryzaki]

And Merril's skin color doesn't look right. Why is she so pale in the offical pic but so dark in the other one?

[MorningBird]

Ryzaki wrote...

And Merril's skin color doesn't look right. Why is she so pale in the offical pic but so dark in the other one?

Lighting.

[Tarahiro]

They're all bi