141 réponses à ce sujet

[scottelite]

My eyes are burning from the cynicism.

[Kronner]

Funny and kinda true

Modifié par Kronner, 28 février 2011 - 06:34 .

[Super_Cat]

Seems more like playful jabs then hate.

Modifié par Super_Cat, 28 février 2011 - 06:35 .

[Typical Forum Sycophant]

Sums up were BioWare went horribly wrong...you don't Scale DOWN, you try to outdo your previous attempts.

 [inappropriate image removed]

Modifié par Stanley Woo, 28 février 2011 - 06:38 .

[Drowsy0106]

Super_Cat wrote...

Seems more like playful jabs then hate.

Indeed

[FearMonkey]

Saibh wrote...
Dragon Age Origins did not have better graphics. You say what you want about thinking they should be better, but claiming DAO had better graphics is utter lunacy.

Here's a screenshot from Dragon Age: Origins:

http://h-5.abload.de...05-14-13mun.jpg

Look at the skeletons on the ground. All the bones are individually modeled and there are no repeating patterns anywhere.

Now compare that to this Dragon Age 2 screenshot:

http://bioware.files...2011/02/077.jpg

Now look at these skeletons in the lower left. The skeletons are all really low-res with crappy textures and there are a bunch of repeating skull/ribcage pieces all over the place.



That's the kind of thing you'd see on the N64, not a PC with these system requirements:

Recommended:
CPU: Intel Core 2 Quad 2.4 GHz Processor or equivalent
CPU: AMD Phenom II X3 Triple core 2.8 GHz or equivalent
RAM: 2GB (4 GB Vista and Windows 7)
Video: ATI 3850 512 MB or greater
Video: NVIDIA 8800GTS 512 MB or greater

Modifié par FearMonkey, 28 février 2011 - 06:43 .

[Veex]

I got the resounding sense of "meh." Taking quotes out of context is the new cool I guess, or the old cool, just coming back in fashion?

[Typical Forum Sycophant]

FearMonkey wrote...

Saibh wrote...
Dragon Age Origins did not have better graphics. You say what you want about thinking they should be better, but claiming DAO had better graphics is utter lunacy.

Here's a screenshot from Dragon Age: Origins:

http://h-5.abload.de...05-14-13mun.jpg

Look at the skeletons on the ground. All the bones are individually modeled and there are no repeating patterns anywhere.

Now compare that to this Dragon Age 2 screenshot:

http://bioware.files...2011/02/077.jpg

Now look at these skeletons in the lower left. The skeletons are all really low-res with crappy textures and there are a bunch of repeating skull/ribcage pieces all over the place.



That's the kind of thing you'd see on the N64, not a PC with these system requirements:

Recommended:
CPU: Intel Core 2 Quad 2.4 GHz Processor or equivalent
CPU: AMD Phenom II X3 Triple core 2.8 GHz or equivalent
RAM: 2GB (4 GB Vista and Windows 7)
Video: ATI 3850 512 MB or greater
Video: NVIDIA 8800GTS 512 MB or greater

all you have to do is compare the darkspawn from DAO and DA2 and you can see the..."improvements"...

[John Epler]

I think 'Brother, why didn't you.. roll mage?!?' is my line of the day.

[iamrawn]

FearMonkey wrote...

Saibh wrote...
Dragon Age Origins did not have better graphics. You say what you want about thinking they should be better, but claiming DAO had better graphics is utter lunacy.

Here's a screenshot from Dragon Age: Origins:

http://h-5.abload.de...05-14-13mun.jpg

Look at the skeletons on the ground. All the bones are individually modeled and there are no repeating patterns anywhere.

Now compare that to this Dragon Age 2 screenshot:

http://bioware.files...2011/02/077.jpg

Now look at these skeletons in the lower left. The skeletons are all really low-res with crappy textures and there are a bunch of repeating skull/ribcage pieces all over the place.



That's the kind of thing you'd see on the N64, not a PC with these system requirements:

Recommended:
CPU: Intel Core 2 Quad 2.4 GHz Processor or equivalent
CPU: AMD Phenom II X3 Triple core 2.8 GHz or equivalent
RAM: 2GB (4 GB Vista and Windows 7)
Video: ATI 3850 512 MB or greater
Video: NVIDIA 8800GTS 512 MB or greater

Haha, wow. Looks like that Saibh person got, what's the word? Oh yeah, PWNED!

[JamesX]

I like the comic strip it is funny.

[Smilehigh]

It's funny only until you stop and think how true it actually is. Then it's kinda sad.

[Lacan2]

XD

FearMonkey wrote...

Here's a screenshot from Dragon Age: Origins:

http://h-5.abload.de...05-14-13mun.jpg

Look at the skeletons on the ground. All the bones are individually modeled and there are no repeating patterns anywhere.

Now compare that to this Dragon Age 2 screenshot:

http://bioware.files...2011/02/077.jpg

Now look at these skeletons in the lower left. The skeletons are all really low-res with crappy textures and there are a bunch of repeating skull/ribcage pieces all over the place.



That's the kind of thing you'd see on the N64, not a PC with these system requirements:

Recommended:
CPU: Intel Core 2 Quad 2.4 GHz Processor or equivalent
CPU: AMD Phenom II X3 Triple core 2.8 GHz or equivalent
RAM: 2GB (4 GB Vista and Windows 7)
Video: ATI 3850 512 MB or greater
Video: NVIDIA 8800GTS 512 MB or greater

LOL wtf happened there? It looks like the days before normal mapping with just flat polygons.

Modifié par Lacan2, 28 février 2011 - 06:49 .

[MorrigansLove]

iamrawn wrote...

FearMonkey wrote...

Saibh wrote...
Dragon Age Origins did not have better graphics. You say what you want about thinking they should be better, but claiming DAO had better graphics is utter lunacy.

Here's a screenshot from Dragon Age: Origins:

http://h-5.abload.de...05-14-13mun.jpg

Look at the skeletons on the ground. All the bones are individually modeled and there are no repeating patterns anywhere.

Now compare that to this Dragon Age 2 screenshot:

http://bioware.files...2011/02/077.jpg

Now look at these skeletons in the lower left. The skeletons are all really low-res with crappy textures and there are a bunch of repeating skull/ribcage pieces all over the place.



That's the kind of thing you'd see on the N64, not a PC with these system requirements:

Recommended:
CPU: Intel Core 2 Quad 2.4 GHz Processor or equivalent
CPU: AMD Phenom II X3 Triple core 2.8 GHz or equivalent
RAM: 2GB (4 GB Vista and Windows 7)
Video: ATI 3850 512 MB or greater
Video: NVIDIA 8800GTS 512 MB or greater

Haha, wow. Looks like that Saibh person got, what's the word? Oh yeah, PWNED!

Haha, agreed.

[Maelora]

Unfunny nerds are unfunny.

[tmp7704]

JohnEpler wrote...

I think 'Brother, why didn't you.. roll mage?!?' is my line of the day.

Should've pressed A.

Speaking of which, the A-A-A-Awesome was my favourite.

[RealityEngine]

 The old SA thread is pretty funny too. It has golden **** like this post.

[RealityEngine]

Edit: doublepost.

Modifié par RealityEngine, 28 février 2011 - 06:58 .

[lv12medic]

FearMonkey wrote...

Saibh wrote...
Dragon Age Origins did not have better graphics. You say what you want about thinking they should be better, but claiming DAO had better graphics is utter lunacy.

Here's a screenshot from Dragon Age: Origins:

http://h-5.abload.de...05-14-13mun.jpg

Look at the skeletons on the ground. All the bones are individually modeled and there are no repeating patterns anywhere.

Now compare that to this Dragon Age 2 screenshot:

http://bioware.files...2011/02/077.jpg

I think a fairer comparison would be to either show an interior screenshot of DA2 or an exterior screenshot from DA:O, especially around Redcliffe by the lake (seems about the same color pallete).

The skeletons are funny though.  The DA:O ones ribs are spaced ridiculously far apart and the DA2 ones look like they were made from Dr. Frankentein's Playdough machine.

[Saibh]

FearMonkey wrote...

Here's a screenshot from Dragon Age: Origins:

http://h-5.abload.de...05-14-13mun.jpg

Look at the skeletons on the ground. All the bones are individually modeled and there are no repeating patterns anywhere.

Now compare that to this Dragon Age 2 screenshot:

http://bioware.files...2011/02/077.jpg

Now look at these skeletons in the lower left. The skeletons are all really low-res with crappy textures and there are a bunch of repeating skull/ribcage pieces all over the place.

Let me understand this, did you take the most detailed shot in Origins  Awakening you can? Because that's probably the most detailed area.

I mean, do you really want me to pull out a bunch of ugly screenshots from DAO?  To "prove" my point? That's confirmation bias.

The skeletons are no worse, and no better. You zoomed in as close as you could possibly get. The DAO skeleteons look just as bad.

No repeat patterns, huh?



I mean, what is up with those gigantic eye sockets, that look like they've been scared? What's up with the beak? No skeleton in Thedas should look like that.

Modifié par Saibh, 28 février 2011 - 07:01 .

[Aoba]

Saibh wrote...

Catsith wrote...

DA2's pretty much the laughing stock of the internet at this point.

Then you can go ahead and leave, then, so you're not lumped in with us idiots!

Quote of the day:

"We're idiots, but we're their idiots." - Bioware Fans

I was never more proud of us as a fanbase. We deserve cake! LOTS OF CAKE! GO CAKE! WHOOHOO!

[Melca36]

Whats the average age of the posters there? 18-23?

[Zkyire]

Guys, if you fight, they'll lock it. Just enjoy it for what it is.

[metalfenix]

System Requirements:

MINIMUM

-486 Intel processor or 100% compatible
-4MB RAM
-MS-DOS 5.0 or higher
-8MB hard drive space
-256-color VGA graphics card
-CD-ROM drive

RECOMMENDED

-486/33MHz
-1MB video card
-Sound Blaster or 100% compatible sound card
-Double-speed CD-ROM drive

LOL, I need to upgrade my PC to meet the minimum requirements

Modifié par metalfenix, 28 février 2011 - 07:05 .

[Saibh]

Melca36 wrote...

Whats the average age of the posters there? 18-23?

That's about the same as here, actually.