Aller au contenu

Photo

Will there ever be a Mass Effect 4?


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
523 réponses à ce sujet

#501
urazoktay

urazoktay
  • Members
  • 25 messages

Revan111 wrote...


What the **** are you talking about seriously WTF. You start talking about how I was wrong about Miranda which I was sorry propably should have reseached that better but everyone I talked to said Miranda died in thier game as well so for me and my freinds to play mass effect 4 we need to start the game again and save Miranda, **** YOU I'm not sitting on my ass for another 30 hours just to save miranda that **** can **** off and also I don't think cerberus will bring her back when the illussive man is just lying there waiting to be resurected and the alliance has lost dozens of amirals and generals so I don't think a rouge cerberus agent is on the top of their bring back to life list and they wouldn't even bring back shepard back to life again because they need to rebuild earth and countless other planets but if shepard was still breathing I guess they would give him top medical support. And then you go off telling me about the indoctronation theory, I all ready know it I think it is a good theory but bioware has denided that theory so all endings are canon no matter what you say. But I have something to ask you did you read all of assassins and my posts because you mainly just call me out on my first and second points and not the other three, you just say "yes his is logical because of the destroy ending and it has Miranda the rest about the space traviling giant squids is not important, now let me tell you about the indoctriantion theory and why it should work but bioware says no to it" I mean you agree with him but not me because I chose synthisis ending and he chose the destroy ending, thats bull**** and you are a ****, ****** and **** combinded into one. 
[/quote

Use your brain a little eh, i won't waste my breathe for a child like you.  Just for the record, if you happened to live somewhere near, i swear i would make your sorry little ... regret all those insults.

İ do not write all those for someone like you, that's the reason you didn't get anything i wrote. İ suspect you ever read them at all...

Modifié par urazoktay, 01 avril 2013 - 06:22 .


#502
urazoktay

urazoktay
  • Members
  • 25 messages
For all you guys, there is always a canon ending to a story that's being told the way Mass effect does.

İt doesn't have to be spoken out loud at this moment. Storytelling and the ideology behind the whole series demands it, hints at it. Break the Cycle... Cycle varies and continues in other forms in a way with Synth or Control.

You just did not have all the control you think you had in the series. Try to grasp it...

No matter what, you always had to oppose Saren ( sythesize ) and İM ( control ) can't you see how it works?

The game never let you to side with Saren or İM, you just have the option of how you oppose them, Kill them via renegade attitude or charm them and make them kill themselves via paragon.

The trick is that. At some certain times you only have the freedom of choice of attitude towards the same resolve.

İt all comes to this. There was no choice other than the "destroy" story wise. İt was hinted to you all the way right from the first game, especially in the third game everything points you to that direction. Legion, Edi, Hackett, Anderson, everyone.

Choosing Control or Synthesize just means that you had been indoctrinated at last and picked the wrong ones and doom the galaxy.

Those two options will never be canon. And if you happen to realize how Mass Effect storytelling works than you can easily understand it's so easy and inevitable for Bioware to make Destroy as canon.

İt's the way how a story continues, if they ever want to expand the universe after the events that took place in ME 3's ending.

Just get it already.

Your choices did not matter at some certain points for the sake of story to continue. Like even you killed the so called Rachni queen it came somehow in the last game. Like whatever you wanted to do you always ignored the way Saren and İM thoughts on matters.

This applies to the end also.

No matter if you were a paragon or renegade, you had just one option to end the story as the narrative dictates throughout the series. Conrol is İM that you never accepted siding with, Synthesize is Saren you always refused to side with.

İf, and  only if that the story itself gave you the option to side with them than you could say yes we had other two options.

Don't just analyze it as a video game, from a storytelling, narrative perspective it surely has a canon ending.

Mass Effect's real form of free choice was always more about the characterization than control over the story.

You had full control on your relations, how you act to people, how you respond to events and indiviuals around you and you had full control of little stories and some real big ones. But it was all about shaping your character, about how you perceive the world, it was reflected to Shepard by those choices. İn a way, you put yourself to the game as who you are.

BUT... you had never have full control where the story goes. İt's main plot was always directed like it should be, like in any other art form of telling a great story.

There is nothing wrong about that.

You believed you would be riding with your crew in Normandy at the end of ME 2 but instead you found yourself on earth, your crew disassambled. You see, story has it's form of linearity to some degree.

So, if you can understand the concept from a narrative perspective you would't be surprised at all that it has a canon ending in reality. Those two other options will be ignored, cause Shepard ignored them regardless of your choices all along the way till the end. Narrative dictated that to you.

Mass Effect was not a full simulation, it was not about shaping everything out there. İt gave you freedom of choice and full control over your characterization and attidude towards individuals and over many minor and major matters but just not over all of them.

Mass Effect was as much as about telling a story ( reagardless of how you shaped it along the way to some degree ) as it is about having full control over your characterization.

Think of it, just don't got stuck with a gamer perspective. Over all it was a great story, and each story has only one ending to it.

İ wouldn't be telling these if we really had full control on everthing, but in fact we never really had it.

Variables yes, we had control over them, but knowing the way story dictates itself, we can assume we only had some degree of control over it.

To tell a great story, to be able to call it an art form, you have to have some degree of control over it and the real trick is to make people believe thay have full control over everything. That's called Bioware magic. [smilie]http://social.bioware.com/images/forum/emoticons/wink.png[/smilie] That's why people got frustrated and enraged towards Bioware. Lol this alone proves their succes, they really did make believe people had full control over everything. 

Been done otherwise it would be a simulation instead, which Mass Effect simply isn't to full extend. İt has a driven main plot with only one real logical ending to it. And it was hinted to you all the way.[smilie]http://social.bioware.com/images/forum/emoticons/sideways.png[/smilie]


And despite all anger and frustration towards the ending of ME 3, it was a masterpiece, it's just not easy to grasp, that's all. İt seems otherwise at first but it is just way more complicated than how people perceived it.

You see, everyone can make a return, everthing can be made canon easily for the sake of the story.

But the other choices you made along the way can be included in too. But they also can be ignored.

İt's not that hard really.

You killed the Geth and side with Quarians on rannoch? Oh heck, they can easily be put in another ME game via some explanation just like Rachni. Read below how so?

You didn't cured the genophage? Yep it can be undone easily too. Some others will cure it. 


How? you say, and i say GETH are software in essence, LEGİON told that to you, yes, dead platforms won't make them go extinct at all. Their real life is on GETH consensus if you remember. Other option for them to be able to survive relates to that they are not half organic half synthetic like Reapers and we did not see anything about their extinction in slide shows via Destroy ending, did we?

Remember Crucible was designed to target only the Reapers and them alone.

Reapers were not Synthetics. They were a combination of Syntetic and organic life form. EDİ told you that at the end of ME 2.

All the hints were given really, you just have to pay attention to all those little details given to you throughout your journey. They were always there in conversations, in codex's. 

You just have to find the connections.

Crucible was neer been used before and Starchild -Harbinger- was just tryin to manipulate you by saying all Synthetic life would die if you choose to destroy them. İt was a trap, it was trying to make you to take the Synthesize or control path.

Cause they just cared about SELF PRESERVATİON AS EDİ SAİD TO YOU and they need Sytnthetic and organic life to BREED, FEED, to exist. Reapers were just parasites to Galaxy. Their so called solution to impose order to chaos were proven wrong by you if you could manage to get Gath and the Quarian's make peace.

İn fact, their logic was flawed and they were the real chaos for Galaxy, not a solution to them. And they were not needed at all anymore.


No way Starchild could be sure how Crucible will work. No one ever used it before, but he acts like he knows all the outcomes, and by doing so directing you towards Synth and if not Control endings.

İt's only intention was to drag you out of destroy option. And he made you think he GİVES you the destroy option also. This is just the illusion of free choice, but in reality it's just trying to manipulate you by saying "you have the power to destroy US, but if you do so, you'll destroy others", DON'T DO İT DAMMİT ! :)

You were NEVER given the destroy option in fact. İt was always your only intention destroying the Reapers right from the start. He just makes you believe HE gives you that option. Which is wrong.

You already did everything just to destroy them. You did not do all those things just to turn the life on the whole galaxy into Cybernetic Soulles Reapers or become the new Harbinger losing your organic perception and logic.

You didn't cured the genophage? Yep it can be undone easily too. Some others will cure it. 

Why am i telling all these?

Because it was always like this for some main plot progression in whole series.

And it will continue like this for a sequel if Bioware's intention is to make a sequal.

İ guess it is easy to get the idea how things works in Mass Effect storytelling.

Edi dead? Oops but it was just her body, EDİ was Normandy any one[smilie]http://social.bioware.com/images/forum/emoticons/lol.png[/smilie], EDİ was software in essence just like GETH were.

You see, they just have lots of options, and they did this on purpose. İ think Bioware writers are indeed very talented ones. You just have to look to the hints given throughout the whole series.

No bad writing or loop holes, illlogical situations at all. They are just well hidden or not outspoken, that's it.

When you see how things worked out, you'll all be pleased by their explanations on matters i believe.

Oh these ideas are all for a sequel of course.

Modifié par urazoktay, 01 avril 2013 - 06:11 .


#503
ethos231

ethos231
  • Members
  • 5 messages
I want BW to go more in-depth with the love interest in the next game. I cant play another Mass Effect without my Liara by my side, i just cant.

More in-depth as in giving it a more freeroam/roleplaying feel to it, like you can take them to dinner and go on dates and possibly have a wedding in it where Shepard proposes and we finally get our little blue children after the wedding, i would love that. When i spent at least 2-3 hours today spending my time looking at GIFs and picture where Liara was reunited with Shepard after what happened in ME3, most of those GIFs and pictures i saw was just amazing, i wanted everything that those had to be in the game, some of them were so amazing and beautiful that shepard just deserves a happy ending.

#504
master of assassins

master of assassins
  • Members
  • 9 messages
bioware seriously needs to change the ending instead of leaving shepard hanging dry bioware should change the ending to if you choose control or synthesis shepard's crew from 1 to 3 have a funeral in his honor or if you pick destroy he gets patched up and when he wakes up his love interest is by his bedside and they get married and have kids since they wont be making another mass effect game with shepard they have to give shepard the best possible ending to his story like the saying goes go big or go home and bioware decided to go home instead of going big your a big franchise act like it and make damn good high quality games where the fans talk about it for a long time instead of complaining

#505
Revan111

Revan111
  • Members
  • 5 messages

urazoktay wrote...

Revan111 wrote...


What the **** are you talking about seriously WTF. You start talking about how I was wrong about Miranda which I was sorry propably should have reseached that better but everyone I talked to said Miranda died in thier game as well so for me and my freinds to play mass effect 4 we need to start the game again and save Miranda, **** YOU I'm not sitting on my ass for another 30 hours just to save miranda that **** can **** off and also I don't think cerberus will bring her back when the illussive man is just lying there waiting to be resurected and the alliance has lost dozens of amirals and generals so I don't think a rouge cerberus agent is on the top of their bring back to life list and they wouldn't even bring back shepard back to life again because they need to rebuild earth and countless other planets but if shepard was still breathing I guess they would give him top medical support. And then you go off telling me about the indoctronation theory, I all ready know it I think it is a good theory but bioware has denided that theory so all endings are canon no matter what you say. But I have something to ask you did you read all of assassins and my posts because you mainly just call me out on my first and second points and not the other three, you just say "yes his is logical because of the destroy ending and it has Miranda the rest about the space traviling giant squids is not important, now let me tell you about the indoctriantion theory and why it should work but bioware says no to it" I mean you agree with him but not me because I chose synthisis ending and he chose the destroy ending, thats bull**** and you are a ****, ****** and **** combinded into one. 
[/quote

Use your brain a little eh, i won't waste my breathe for a child like you.  Just for the record, if you happened to live somewhere near, i swear i would make your sorry little ... regret all those insults.

İ do not write all those for someone like you, that's the reason you didn't get anything i wrote. İ suspect you ever read them at all...


FYI I did read  your comment and it was not really keeping to what I was saying I said some people might have chosen synthisis or control and this thread is for Mass effect 4 and one of the most famous things about mass effect is importing charaters from the last game and playing as them occasionally having choices from the last game pop up like you saved the rachni or you killed the rachni queen and like you said the story will come up with ways to continue the story like wreav instead of wrex but thats only because they didn't want to isolate new players not because of whatever you said. So bioware are going to put in a import shepard and whatever ending you chose is going to be in the new game bioware dosn't care if fans like you are looking into it to much and saying that ending is not canon they don't give a **** as far as they are concered shepards story is done they are going to move on, the only one I could see them saying is non-canon is the sythisis ending because that is going to be hard to make a game out of and the refusal ending because that one went against everything shepard had been working towards.

#506
urazoktay

urazoktay
  • Members
  • 25 messages

Revan111 wrote...

urazoktay wrote...

Revan111 wrote...


What the **** are you talking about seriously WTF. You start talking about how I was wrong about Miranda which I was sorry propably should have reseached that better but everyone I talked to said Miranda died in thier game as well so for me and my freinds to play mass effect 4 we need to start the game again and save Miranda, **** YOU I'm not sitting on my ass for another 30 hours just to save miranda that **** can **** off and also I don't think cerberus will bring her back when the illussive man is just lying there waiting to be resurected and the alliance has lost dozens of amirals and generals so I don't think a rouge cerberus agent is on the top of their bring back to life list and they wouldn't even bring back shepard back to life again because they need to rebuild earth and countless other planets but if shepard was still breathing I guess they would give him top medical support. And then you go off telling me about the indoctronation theory, I all ready know it I think it is a good theory but bioware has denided that theory so all endings are canon no matter what you say. But I have something to ask you did you read all of assassins and my posts because you mainly just call me out on my first and second points and not the other three, you just say "yes his is logical because of the destroy ending and it has Miranda the rest about the space traviling giant squids is not important, now let me tell you about the indoctriantion theory and why it should work but bioware says no to it" I mean you agree with him but not me because I chose synthisis ending and he chose the destroy ending, thats bull**** and you are a ****, ****** and **** combinded into one. 
[/quote

Use your brain a little eh, i won't waste my breathe for a child like you.  Just for the record, if you happened to live somewhere near, i swear i would make your sorry little ... regret all those insults.

İ do not write all those for someone like you, that's the reason you didn't get anything i wrote. İ suspect you ever read them at all...


FYI I did read  your comment and it was not really keeping to what I was saying I said some people might have chosen synthisis or control and this thread is for Mass effect 4 and one of the most famous things about mass effect is importing charaters from the last game and playing as them occasionally having choices from the last game pop up like you saved the rachni or you killed the rachni queen and like you said the story will come up with ways to continue the story like wreav instead of wrex but thats only because they didn't want to isolate new players not because of whatever you said. So bioware are going to put in a import shepard and whatever ending you chose is going to be in the new game bioware dosn't care if fans like you are looking into it to much and saying that ending is not canon they don't give a **** as far as they are concered shepards story is done they are going to move on, the only one I could see them saying is non-canon is the sythisis ending because that is going to be hard to make a game out of and the refusal ending because that one went against everything shepard had been working towards.


Bro, i want you to read this without a biased attitude towards the ideas, just try to see it this way once, give it a chance, you don't have to of course, but there are some valid points i made if you really want to get them.

Only way to make a canon ending is for them to pick DESTROY not SYTHESİZE...

Synthesize means every life in the Galaxy becomes cybernetic reapers in the end. No DİVERSİTY, no real SOUL, no variety of thoughts, ideology, philosophy, essentially all it does is that. Even the cultrures becomes extinct in a way. A Krogan feels and acts no different than a Salarian in the end.


İT İS impossible for Sythesize to be made canon, if ME universe is to continue from where we left it. İt's nothing but to doom the Galaxy, to make everyone one single being in essence. İt opposes the main idea of Mass Effect as a whole : UNİTY THROUGH DİVERSİTY. Sythesize is just UNİTY THROUGH BRAİNWASHİNG via ARTİFİCİALLY ALTERİNG the DNA of each species. İT İS UNNATURAL, İT İS FORCED UPON, İT İS A MACHİNE LOGİC FAKE SOLUTİON. İt is the SALVATİON of REAPERS and DOOM of all REAL life in the GALAXY. Even DOOM for GETH and EDİ.

Reapers were never alive, never felt this the way organics or Geth, Edi felt. You' re doing them a great favor by choosing Synthesize at the cost of all Sythetic and Organic life losing their essence...

İt is NOT an upgrade like Starchild told you to organics or Sythetics, all life in the Galaxy needs nothing from them, instead Reapers being parasites, they need all organic or sythtetic life in order to HAVE A PURPOSE for being.

İf you take what Starcihild told you as the whole truth this only means you had been indoctrinated via machine logic at last. By doing so you oppose everything you fight for right from the beginning. Synthesize SAREN, Control İM dammit! :)

How can't you see that is beyond my comprehension. İt is simple as that.

Starchild talks with you in confidence but in fact it was damned freaked out. İt was trying to find a new purpose for Reapers to stay alive, no they were never really needed at all. Their solution was flawed right from the beginning of the cycle.

THEİR SOLUTİON'S ONLY İNTENTİON WAS TO GİVE THEM PURPOSE FOR BEİNG. THE WHOLE İDEA OF PROTECTİNG ORGANİCS FROM SYNTHETİCS WAS ALWAYS A PREDİCTİON ABOUT SYNTHETİCS WOULD DESTROY WHOLE ORGANİC LİFE AT SOME POİNT,  NOTHİNG MORE THAN THAT, THEY NEVER GAVE LİFE İN THE GALAXY THE CHANCE TO SOLVE THİS PROBLEM BY THEMSELVES. SOLUTİON WAS ONLY FOR SELF PRESERVATİON OF THE REAPERS, THEY WERE NO CLEANSİNG FİRE AS THEY CALL THEMSELVES NOR NATURAL, THEY HAD NOTHİNG TO DO WİTH LAWS OF EVOLUTİON, İN FACT THEY WERE AN İNSULT TO İT, A VİOLATİON TO İT.

THEY WERE FEEDİNG AND BREEDİNG ALL THİS TİME, İN ALL THİS ENDLESS CYCLE, OVER ORGANİCS AND SYNTHETİCS.


Geth and EDİ mentioned several times that they rather die than become united with Reapers. Geth are a free people and they want to find their own path thus rejecting any kind of REAPER influence on them.

Remember what SOVEREİGN said? You use OUR tech, you evolve along the paths we desire. And this time they want Synthesize, if not, control, better than to go extinct for Reapers right?

Starchild was Harbinger, and they were just desperate, afraid, never saw crucible in front of them before, never saw an organic just seconds away from destroying them once and for all. 

People really need to think about this, you weren't the one who was doomed at the end of the game in fact, Reapers and Harbinger were. He just tried to manipulate you with his so called perfect machine logic.

Guess what, even GETH has ORGANİC perspective, even EDİ, Reapers full machine logic and perception of things were flawed right from the beginning. 

The İRONY is they were the chaos all along, not order.

Just put some thoughts in it before trying to oppose everything i said. 

Shepard will return, either remembered via destroying the reapers or as the main protagonist. You'll see.

SHEPARDS LEGACY OR EVEN MAYBE HİS STORY WİLL CONTİNUE, THE ONLY THİNG THAT REALLY ENDED WAS THE REAPER STORY WİTH THE TRİLOGY.

AND İT ONLY REALLY ENDS VİA DESTROY. That's why DESTROY will be made canon if they ever want to expand the story where ME 3 left, believe me. With Synthesize you have no reason to tell a story, every one İS SAME, every one becomes some FORM OF REAPER. 

İ understand what you said but heed my words dammit! What you chose at the end didn't matter like the way you believe it did.

At certain times story dictates itself, it was always like this in ME series. The whole idea was to BREAK THE CYCLE no matter the cost right from the beginning.


By choosing Sythesize or Control you aren't breaking anything, you're just modifying the cycle, finding another lame excuse for Reapers to exist.

They can not be made CANON. And will never be nevertheless. Mass Effect has a driven story, and if it ever to be continued, no way it would be via control or sythesize believe me bro.



Just try to read all my posts without some kind a fury, anger and prejudice towards me. Oh by the way, some text was written with caps lock on, i just wanted to say them out loud, no other intentions otherwise.

Take care, and try to keep a friendly attitude this time no matter what you think about what i've been writing down.

We all love Mass Effect, in fact i'm in love with it to put it right.:)

İ

Modifié par urazoktay, 02 avril 2013 - 07:38 .


#507
master of assassins

master of assassins
  • Members
  • 9 messages
urazoktay does make valid points about synthesis and control your just doing the reapers bidding and dooming yourself and the entire galaxy and making it impossible to make another mass effect game with synthesis everyone is the same so there wouldn't be any kind of conflict what so ever and with control if there was some kind of conflict shepard would send some reapers to the conflict and end it before it gets out of hand so destroy by logic has to be the only real ending for there to be another mass effect game and like urazoktay said it goes against everything shepard stands for

#508
Revan111

Revan111
  • Members
  • 5 messages

urazoktay wrote...
Bro, i want you to read this without a biased attitude towards the ideas, just try to see it this way once, give it a chance, you don't have to of course, but there are some valid points i made if you really want to get them.

Only way to make a canon ending is for them to pick DESTROY not SYTHESİZE...

Synthesize means every life in the Galaxy becomes cybernetic reapers in the end. No DİVERSİTY, no real SOUL, no variety of thoughts, ideology, philosophy, essentially all it does is that. Even the cultrures becomes extinct in a way. A Krogan feels and acts no different than a Salarian in the end.


İT İS impossible for Sythesize to be made canon, if ME universe is to continue from where we left it. İt's nothing but to doom the Galaxy, to make everyone one single being in essence. İt opposes the main idea of Mass Effect as a whole : UNİTY THROUGH DİVERSİTY. Sythesize is just UNİTY THROUGH BRAİNWASHİNG via ARTİFİCİALLY ALTERİNG the DNA of each species. İT İS UNNATURAL, İT İS FORCED UPON, İT İS A MACHİNE LOGİC FAKE SOLUTİON. İt is the SALVATİON of REAPERS and DOOM of all REAL life in the GALAXY. Even DOOM for GETH and EDİ.

Reapers were never alive, never felt this the way organics or Geth, Edi felt. You' re doing them a great favor by choosing Synthesize at the cost of all Sythetic and Organic life losing their essence...

İt is NOT an upgrade like Starchild told you to organics or Sythetics, all life in the Galaxy needs nothing from them, instead Reapers being parasites, they need all organic or sythtetic life in order to HAVE A PURPOSE for being.

İf you take what Starcihild told you as the whole truth this only means you had been indoctrinated via machine logic at last. By doing so you oppose everything you fight for right from the beginning. Synthesize SAREN, Control İM dammit! :)

How can't you see that is beyond my comprehension. İt is simple as that.

Starchild talks with you in confidence but in fact it was damned freaked out. İt was trying to find a new purpose for Reapers to stay alive, no they were never really needed at all. Their solution was flawed right from the beginning of the cycle.

THEİR SOLUTİON'S ONLY İNTENTİON WAS TO GİVE THEM PURPOSE FOR BEİNG. THE WHOLE İDEA OF PROTECTİNG ORGANİCS FROM SYNTHETİCS WAS ALWAYS A PREDİCTİON ABOUT SYNTHETİCS WOULD DESTROY WHOLE ORGANİC LİFE AT SOME POİNT,  NOTHİNG MORE THAN THAT, THEY NEVER GAVE LİFE İN THE GALAXY THE CHANCE TO SOLVE THİS PROBLEM BY THEMSELVES. SOLUTİON WAS ONLY FOR SELF PRESERVATİON OF THE REAPERS, THEY WERE NO CLEANSİNG FİRE AS THEY CALL THEMSELVES NOR NATURAL, THEY HAD NOTHİNG TO DO WİTH LAWS OF EVOLUTİON, İN FACT THEY WERE AN İNSULT TO İT, A VİOLATİON TO İT.

THEY WERE FEEDİNG AND BREEDİNG ALL THİS TİME, İN ALL THİS ENDLESS CYCLE, OVER ORGANİCS AND SYNTHETİCS.


Geth and EDİ mentioned several times that they rather die than become united with Reapers. Geth are a free people and they want to find their own path thus rejecting any kind of REAPER influence on them.

Remember what SOVEREİGN said? You use OUR tech, you evolve along the paths we desire. And this time they want Synthesize, if not, control, better than to go extinct for Reapers right?

Starchild was Harbinger, and they were just desperate, afraid, never saw crucible in front of them before, never saw an organic just seconds away from destroying them once and for all. 

People really need to think about this, you weren't the one who was doomed at the end of the game in fact, Reapers and Harbinger were. He just tried to manipulate you with his so called perfect machine logic.

Guess what, even GETH has ORGANİC perspective, even EDİ, Reapers full machine logic and perception of things were flawed right from the beginning. 

The İRONY is they were the chaos all along, not order.

Just put some thoughts in it before trying to oppose everything i said. 

Shepard will return, either remembered via destroying the reapers or as the main protagonist. You'll see.

SHEPARDS LEGACY OR EVEN MAYBE HİS STORY WİLL CONTİNUE, THE ONLY THİNG THAT REALLY ENDED WAS THE REAPER STORY WİTH THE TRİLOGY.

AND İT ONLY REALLY ENDS VİA DESTROY. That's why DESTROY will be made canon if they ever want to expand the story where ME 3 left, believe me. With Synthesize you have no reason to tell a story, every one İS SAME, every one becomes some FORM OF REAPER. 

İ understand what you said but heed my words dammit! What you chose at the end didn't matter like the way you believe it did.

At certain times story dictates itself, it was always like this in ME series. The whole idea was to BREAK THE CYCLE no matter the cost right from the beginning.


By choosing Sythesize or Control you aren't breaking anything, you're just modifying the cycle, finding another lame excuse for Reapers to exist.

They can not be made CANON. And will never be nevertheless. Mass Effect has a driven story, and if it ever to be continued, no way it would be via control or sythesize believe me bro.



Just try to read all my posts without some kind a fury, anger and prejudice towards me. Oh by the way, some text was written with caps lock on, i just wanted to say them out loud, no other intentions otherwise.

Take care, and try to keep a friendly attitude this time no matter what you think about what i've been writing down.

We all love Mass Effect, in fact i'm in love with it to put it right.:)

İ




You know what I'm sick of fighting with you, you seem like a nice and intelligent person who stands by his beliefs can we just agree that the ending was just bull**** and not the right way to end mass effect 3. What do you say truce? 
BTW I do agree with you on the sythisis ending that basicly turning the whole universe into the one thing they didn't want to turn into. And also what is your opinion on the refuse ending because I don't think you have mentioned it yet?

#509
urazoktay

urazoktay
  • Members
  • 25 messages

Revan111 wrote...


You know what I'm sick of fighting with you, you seem like a nice and intelligent person who stands by his beliefs can we just agree that the ending was just bull**** and not the right way to end mass effect 3. What do you say truce? 
BTW I do agree with you on the sythisis ending that basicly turning the whole universe into the one thing they didn't want to turn into. And also what is your opinion on the refuse ending because I don't think you have mentioned it yet?


Yes, i agree, there is no need for Mass Effect lovers like us to fight, thank you for your compliments. İn fact i am open to other ideas, and i believe there may be much to realize for me in ME universe.

Regarding the ending, my only complain about it might be it did not felt like really ended. İt was more like we have so much to do afterwards. ( in destroy ending at least )

But it is an open door for possible future story continuation i believe, so i am kind a ok with that.

Ending atmosphere of ME 3 is just heavy and dramatic. And i am ok with that too, beacuse it was like that right from the beginning of ME 3.

İn a way it was always hinted to us that when Reapers arrive it would be a desperate war with them. Hope of survival was always hinted to be slim to none. Sovereigh told you that in ME 1, Harbinger at the end of ME 2 ( Human, you changed nothing...)

So it was no surprise for me how heavy the atmosphere was in ME 3 really. İt was meant to be like that right from the beginning. 

Remember how hard it was to stop only one capital reaper ship in ME 1...

İ quess a lot of people couldn't handle the dramatic and hopeless atmosphere of ME 3 properly, i can't blame them, but it was meant to be that way, it shouldn't be a surprise to anyone.

Other  than that it would be nice to see more fight on London with our war assets.

Where was Major Kirrahe?, Aralakh company, and many more we acquired the support of along the way.

Fleet battle was satisfying for me. But as you know,no matter how epic it was for me, as a whole ( talking about last hours of ME3 , right from London ) it could be done so much better. But it had to be at least double the scope of London to the Citadel path in order to achieve this.

İ wish i saw all my war assets was doing something in game and via cutscenes.

Other than that it was a masterpiece in my eyes, everything in it. But as i said Mass Effect as a whole was so epic to an extent that it would probably take maybe even more than 5 months to end it like we all kind a wish they did. 

Cinematography, drama, music, diologs ( all this in EC ) concept was just crafted brilliantly as i see it.

Unlike people tend to believe, the ending to ME 3 was really bold, has nothing to do with simple choices really, has nothing to do with cliche's in my eyes. 

All i can say about this is, maybe it could have been better, but i was so into it and was so shocked with the ending it made me cry.

And i believe it is just not fair to call it a bad ending, it was just not easy for many to handle, that's it.

İt was devastating, overwhelming but truly heart touching also. İf you come to think of it, Mass Effect was always about making hard choices and trying to deal with the emotional burden that comes with them... Right from the first game... You felt depressed and guilty when you had to sacrifice Ash or Kaidan... Mass Effect had it's dramatic approach right from the beginning.

İf you see it that way, even if you can't accept a sappy ending you can understand why it was like that.

But, if you ask me...

İ GİVE MİRANDA MY PROMİSE DAMMİT! İ give her a promise for the very first time! Just take me out of that pile of rubble and unite me with her, with Garrus, with wrex, with Normandy!

DAMMİT!

Even so, i saw my Shep being alive, my crew not believing me being dead, my Miranda waiting for me gazing at the stars...

İ was given hope...

High ems Destroy ending is the only ending with some kind of real happiness and hope in it.

And like you said i am kind of a person who stands by his beliefs, my belief regarding Mass Effect was  "holding the line, keeping the hope till the end" and i got that hope in the end. Shed some tears, felt kind a sappy at the ending.

İ am really emotionally attached to Mass Effect as a whole.

And the hope of Shepard finding his LI, uniting with his crew on Normandy was given to me in the end.

İt just brought tears in my eyes. İ love Mass Effect, i just can't judge it relating to how they did not show our war assets doing some real things in game via real time and or via cutscenes.

Yes, it lacks those things, i admit it, but it just can't change my passion for the last hours of ME 3.

And also the way the ending was structured was pure epic, if you can see the whole picture and find the connections. 

İt just lacks definition but in my eyes it is not a negative thing. İ prefer to find and realize those little things rather then been given via many explanations.

İ really tried so hard to grasp it as a whole after the ending, i played it several times looking for clues. And it grew on me in time.

İ am still in awe by the ending of ME 3 ( EC )

İ recalled what İM and Saren said before, EDİ, Legion, Garrus did and said before, what others said before throughout the whole series and i started to grasp the whole idea of the ending. İt had really complex structure, people believe that it was idiotically simple but they were wrong. 

İt is so deep that it seems dull and hollow at first sight.

Just realizing at the end, how Reaper on Rannoch told us  " finish your war, we will be there in the end..." send shivers to my body. 

And you start to realize who the heck was that starchild, and what was he trying to do... This is just one example, i ve been writing them down lately...

When all those pieces come together, the ending to ME3 becomes a masterpiece...

İf you pay enough attention to dialogs and other things in the series, you can see that there were so many connections to the endgame.

İ just admire and give my respect to the writers of ME trilogy. 

But i can relate to you really. İt overwhelmed me too and i really couldn't shake that feeling off for about a week. İ felt so depressed after the ending.

But in my eyes it was pure beauty. Regarding your thoughts on the ending being not the right way to conclude ME Trilogy's story, i believe it wasn't the end for that story at all.

So in a way i have hopes for the story to continue in the future somehow, this makes me shake some depression off my soul i might add.

My belief is that Shepard - at some point- will be remembered via high ems destroy ending, with variables regarding our choices or even might become the main protagonist once more and continue his journey.

This thought just makes me feel kind a settled with the ending.

But if Bioware is not to mention anything about his legacy or make another game with him in the future, then i will surely say it was not a proper way to end this epic trilogy.

İt just deserves so much more closure and a little continuation to it if this trilogy is to really end.

As you see, my guess and my hope is that, that wasn't really an ending to Shepards story. İ believe we will be either remembering him via his doings or maybe even continue his story. This may happen as it was like in Halo, after some spinoff or a prequel maybe. But i believe Bioware will return to Shepard once more eventually, this way or that way.

For refusal ending, i wrote something about it on another thread. İ may simply say it is a thing nor a paragon neither renegade Shepard would do. İt's just out of character for Shepard. By choosing it ( remember Shepard has no clue in the end how Liara's data could be of any help for the next cycle ) all you do is just letting all organic and synthetic ( nearly all, i know ) life in the Galaxy to go extinct, if you would choose this, why had all the trouble right from the beginning seriously, lol.

You should really let the reapers do their thing then, why bother if you would let them continue the cycle at the end, out of some utter nonsense sense of free will. İt is a pure blinded motive,morality to choose that path. İt is a useless attempt for trying to be a so called idealist.

İt is complete passivism and nothing more. You just let all Asari, Krogan, Turian, Human and the other races to go extinct, that's pure nonsense.

Hell, even the symbol of passivism Gandhi would't choose that lol.
 
İt is not even being about idealistic at all. İt's pure passivism, Shepard is a man of action. No matter what, it makes no sense to choose that path in order to prove some point of false sense of free will.

You are just letting Reapers to continue what they were doing for endless cycless to come by choosing refusal.

And refusal will never be canon for the fact that that it means all those created races for Mass Effect universe can never ever be included in any other "sequel" Mass Effect game.

These are my thoughts on refusal ending.

İt may seem like rebelling against starchild ( Harbinger in fact ) but has no meaning at all. Reapers continue their harvest as they planned, so what's the point, why even bother to play the series really? :crying:

Does it really matter if Liara grew a backbone unlike you and make some preparations, putting all the data together for the other cycle in order to give them a chance of DESTROYİNG the reapers.

Guess what, you could have done it and save this cycle already lol, but instead you did the most dumbest thing ( im not saying this to you you know that right? ) and let them continue their harvest...

READ THİS CAREFULLY

So if you really thought  you did a good thing by choosing refusal, why the heck the other cycle DESTROYED the reapers dammit!:lol:

Lol...Because unlike the ones who tends to think choosing refusal, synth or even control was the right thing to do, the next cycle got smarten up and did the only thing that could be done, took the real path to the only way to break the cycle for real.

They friggin destroyed them.:D

Man, even the end of refusal points you to destroy ending...

Why the heck next cycle never chose to control the reapers or chose synthesize and essentially became reapers in the end.

They just destroyed them.:D

Even the next cycle knew that was their only real salvation, solution to this matter, yet people defend control or synth...:P

You see the references given to you here and there that points you the only option you had right from the beginning?

İf one can't grasp it after all these evidences given to them or been made clear to them afterwards, there is just no way one can realize it onwards i fear.

These are my thoughts on that matter. 

İ am wholeheartedly open to other ideas to convince me otherwise. But i just can't see it happening really. 

İ made myself pretty clear and grounded my thougts, i believe. 

Remember, all those thoughts are related to the continuation of the story after the ending. They are for any possible sequals to come, if they ever come at all.

My belief is what i put forward about the ending of ME 3 is the only logical and coherent way to be able to progress the story afterwards, if this is to be Bioware's intention in the future.

ME's story leads and links to "destroy" ending in numerous ways. Conrol, Synth and Refusal endings were rejected by it in numerous ways, just try to flashback to those moments when they were repeatedly rejected by storytelling via Shepard and other characters. İf there was ever a support for Synth or Control, story would give you the option to side with Saren and İM, instead you never had the option to do so, you rejected them everytime regardless of being a paragon or renegade. So it is important to understand the story as a whole, it is important to understand you had never FULL CONTROL on the narrative, it always had a driven story to a degree, you shaped the rest but not the Reaper WAR plot.

Mass Effect was not a full simulation at all. Your real freedom was shaping your character through some choices, how you treat to people, tons of minor and major matters.

Reaper War being the grand scheme of things, you only really had the option of destroying them, every other option were just there to trick you, instead of being any kind of a solution.

Thinking backwards through the series, i believe anyone can see that crystal clear.

To make predictions about control or synth endings and about their future continuations just makes one miss all those clues, hints, tips given to you in your journey. İt prevents you from fully grasping the true nature of Mass Effect story and leaves you with wild fantasies instead.

Those what i mentioned here had their grounds from the game itself instead of being my minds wild imaginations. No fantasies or wishfull thinking. They are just a combination of facts included in the story itself.

Take care my friend.;)

Modifié par urazoktay, 04 avril 2013 - 01:36 .


#510
Sentibunny

Sentibunny
  • Members
  • 94 messages
I like Synthesis because it's proven in the EC that it brought peace. As for sequels yes it makes sense for Destroy to be canon, but Synthesis has and always will be the best option imo.

#511
master of assassins

master of assassins
  • Members
  • 9 messages
bioware seriously needs to update mass effect 3 ending there is still too many unanswered questions like what happens to shepard's crew after the normandy is repaired and they leave the planet they crashed on and what happens to shepard's love interest that's on some planet waiting for him/her and what happens to shepard after he/she takes a breath on the pile of rubble does someone find him/her and get him/her to a hospital in time to fix him/her up or does he/she die in the pile of rubble cause nobody got to him/her in time and if what bioware says is true about the next mass effect game not being about shepard then they have to answer these questions before they make another mass effect game unless they change their change their minds and make another mass effect game with shepard that will answer all these unanswered questions and bioware needs to pay attention and listen to what we fans are saying and what we want cause without our support and loyalty bioware will go down very fast and they don't want that i wonder if bioware will read this and respond to this and i wonder how many fan support i will get if any

#512
user1234567890

user1234567890
  • Members
  • 30 messages
Omg, are you still on to ME3? O_O

I'd vote for them hiring some actually good writers and do a proper ME story-driven game for once. The atmosphere and the dialog was off-mark even in the ME3 demo... I won't dive too deep here, but I still love the ME universe. It's like a cool story to 'play' (yes, I know the choices have to be railed, more or less, but I don't care; it was asum derp!).

#513
urazoktay

urazoktay
  • Members
  • 25 messages
You'd vote for them hiring some actually good writers AND therefore do a PROPER ME story-driven game FOR ONCE!

Seriously buddy, MASS EFFECT writers, right from the beginning till the end, did an excellent job on writing, on narrative, on storytelling.

İ bet you weren't able to get even a glimpse of this masterfully crafted piece of art if you're saying such things.

And you had to dive very deep in order to grasp Mass Effect as a whole and its real value. Never before in gaming history we came to see such thing.

Mass Effect trilogy is not just best game series ever made, it is also one of the best fictional( it is the best one for me ) universes ever been created, one of the best stories ever been told, and just the most heart touching, full of emotion experience you can hope for. A single novel, a movie, a poem, a game or any form of art have never came close to what Mass Effect trilogy accomplished. And this comes from a guy who got his share of classic literature, some great movies and tons of games all those years.

Just don't play it like it is game, and just don't try to understand it from just a gamer's perspective, it has so much more...

And Mass Effect writers did an excellent job on telling one of the most beatiful and creative stories ever been made, told...

Mass Effect trilogy  touches the hearts of anyone who are willing to let it to do so, it questions nearly every aspect and issues of being human. İt puts your conception of morality to test. 

Mass Effect trilogy questions your perception of humanity and give your choices the logical outcomes you deserved.

İt is so much more than a video game, take it seriously, İt simply tries to evolve one's mind, thoughts on matters like public and individual relations, social, psychological issues.

Most people out there treats it like a simple video game, thus they think writers of Mass Effect were bad...

Just unbelievable...

Modifié par urazoktay, 10 avril 2013 - 09:38 .


#514
master of assassins

master of assassins
  • Members
  • 9 messages
this is probably the wrong place to ask but does coalesced editor for me3 work for the 360 version or is it for the pc only

#515
taglag

taglag
  • Members
  • 248 messages
I did not read all the threads here, but I would think they have the engine. The graphics are plenty good, I don't see the need to buff the graphics better just to sell hard ware.

But A new story, and new characters, hopefully characters that can get a retirement home [and actually get to use it], and ride off into the sun set at the end [ Happy Ending ]

But I am fine with the graphics, I just want another nice well though out story like ME1, more evened out relationships for the fem Character, and I wish they would realize girls don't run like men, and they enjoy dancing more, and fix there female animations accordingly, and hopefully and editor, allowing for players to actually create there own story's once they have finished the main game.

Modifié par taglag, 15 avril 2013 - 09:42 .


#516
master of assassins

master of assassins
  • Members
  • 9 messages
I think they will make another mass effect game with shepard as the main player cause if you listen and pay attention at the very end of the game when the old man and boy are talking the boy says to the old man tell me another story about shepard and the old man says alright one more story so with that being said i think the next mass effect game will be about shepard they say its not going to be but i think their just keeping it hush hush and when the game gets revealed we'll find out that it is about shepard cause what the little boy and old man said at the very end of me3

#517
meznaric

meznaric
  • Members
  • 199 messages
They already said that Shepard will not reappear, I don't know why people keep saying they think (s)he will. They also said that the choices made in 1-3 will have an impact in 4. I can entirely imagine that Liara (one of the few guaranteed survivors), Grunt (if he survived) and maybe Wrex could make an appearance in 4 given their species' long lifespans.

Also, the vague and closure free ending of ME3 is potentially a good thing for a sequel as they are leaving the story open for continuation and clarification.

#518
agentN7

agentN7
  • Members
  • 141 messages
They are talking about doing a spin off. I'd rather they killed the game than go down that route. DLC was pushing it, but a full game when we know the fate already ?....no chance your average gamer will buy it. Bioware have turned the title into a limping dog that needs tenderly put down for its own benefit.




http://www.oxm.co.uk...spin-off-games/

Modifié par agentN7, 12 mai 2013 - 01:43 .


#519
Grifter Hawke

Grifter Hawke
  • Members
  • 3 messages
at least is not an ugly prequel :D
but the ilusive man? oh cmon!

#520
Holy_Maker

Holy_Maker
  • Members
  • 9 messages
They can make ME4 starting when Shepard wakes up after party (one day later after victory over collectors), and everything what happend in ME3 was just his bad dream

#521
PHGDAL

PHGDAL
  • Members
  • 47 messages
I really dislike the idea of a prequel. Anything as a prequel will suck for Mass Effect. The game itself is one which takes pride in the choices you make and how you shape the story. What room is there to manoeuvre if you already know how everything turns out?? You'll get another game where your decisions don't matter.

I really like the comments made by urazoktay. I agree with him that a continuation after Mass Effect 3 is certainly possible, bringing back everything we loved about the series (and yes Destroy is the only logical canon ending if there is one).

I originally despised the ending of ME 3 because it didn't let me go back to Rannoch with Tali. I mean come on, not letting Shepard be with his LI after those gruesome battles is just cruel. But I eventually accepted the ending simply because there is still hope they made it out alive and will be together (in a high EMS Destroy ending).

Continuing the series in another game for me HAS to come after this trilogy. Any other game will be horrible, no RPG element if you're forced to follow the story already written for each of those past wars.
What I don't understand is why Bioware is focusing so much on wars. Seriously, this game is not supposed to be an Action game! It's an RPG. I don't know about you guys, but I would be very happy continuing Shepard's story after ME3 and having no "galaxy saving missions", only the basic Spectre stuff.
I mean, can you imagine an open world ME game where you go to any planet you wish (no main story line to force you to specific systems all the time) and stop evil people (help them if you're renegade).
Something like a GTA-styled ME would also be perfect. The one thing that pissed me off about the Citadel DLC was Tali going "If that's what it takes for you to take me somewhere nice" after the casino mission. I would love to be able to take her out to do stuff (similar to the GTA - dating missions where you can go to them whenever you feel like it and spend time with them).

I feel that even though ME3 was a great game overall it lacked a lot of RPG-styled elements.
And frankly, every game/universe needs a symbol. The symbol for Halo is MasterChief, he hasn't died yet, why does Shepard have to die? In fact, I think EA and Bioware is effectively crippling their franchise by killing off Shepard. At least for me, there is no Mass Effect without Shepard, Garrus, and Tali.

If this game franchise is so much about choice, why can't it let the player choose whether to continue as Shepard or not?
For example, continue the story after the destruction of the Reapers.
If you don't import a game - you start a new character, a new hero who takes Shepard's actions as an inspiration to becoming great.
If you do import a ME 3 save, you let the player CHOOSE - continue with Shepard as though he survived the battle of Earth and he can help rebuild, OR you start with a new character as well and simply take the past events and character level from the save.

People also complain that Bioware couldn't continue the story. Now that's just insulting to them. I think they're perfectly capable of continuing it, here are some ideas:
- Krogan attempt to get revenge for the Genophage, despite Wrex and Bakara being against the revenge idea, they state throughout ME3 that Wrex might not be able to keep all other clans in check. There could be Krogan civil war.
- Leviathan (SPOILER in case you don't have the DLC) they say they aren't fighting the Reapers to save Humanity and other species, they are fighting for their own survival and they have always believed they were superior, why not have them be the new enemy? Make the attempt to control the galaxy.
- Using Reaper technology. In Mass Effect 3, the beginning of the game you find many "Reaper Blackstars" where you could use them against Brutes and Harvesters, why weren't these weapons used against the Reapers on Earth? Maybe even Harbinger? At any rate, they could still use Reaper tech salvaged from the remains on the galaxy to improve their technology and weapons (assuming you disagree with the geth self-determination mentality).
-With the point above taken into consideration, mastering Mass Effect field-technology, could allow you to make your own mass relays, allowing you to explore a nearby galaxy maybe? Or even go through the disabled mass relay of the Citadel to the "Reaper Dark Space" and they could find an entire Reaper-civilisation that was out of the range of the Crucible. (A bit far-fetched, and frankly I would prefer the Reapers gone for good but this is still an option).
- What about exploring disabled relays? There were so many that were not activated because of the Council's Treaty. You could be a Spectre in charge of re-activating them (after fixing them assuming they were also damaged) to find new species, expand on the universe we already have.
- Side missions where you can help the Quarians re-acquire their embassy on the citadel? Perhaps even help the Batarians establish peace amongst themselves now that they know what it is like to fight along side each other and then help them get an embassy as well?
-Exploit customisation, make it so that you have an inventory again, it's an RPG element that is missing since ME1, make it so that you can carry loot and then allow you to store your items either in your ship or at a house (allow you to purchase a house wherever you wish, Rannoch with Tali, Palaven with Garrus, Thessia with Liara, and maybe even Earth).
-In light of Shepard's huge contributions to stopping the Reapers, he could be promoted to a higher rank, given a larger ship (since many of us love the Normandy, I'm sure they could also make it a choice, the player could choose to accept or reject the new ship). But even then they could allow us to customise the ship again, like ME2 allowed us to improve the Normandy.
-You can improve the Citadel, it's supposed to be massive yet it seems smaller than my university's classrooms, what's up with that? Sure it could be processor-intensive but you can always make the graphics adjustable to help slow PCs run the game, and since the new Xbox One and the PS4 will be beasts in processing power, you don't even need to worry about them keeping the game back.

There's just so much they can do with what they have already done, why would they just throw away that potential?
I know EA has been voted as the worst company in the world for their money-milking habits, but frankly, EA, if you want money you can damn well make a great game and charge 150 bucks for it. As long as the game delivers a great experience, and it is clear that you did your best to make it a good one, I'll gladly pay. I would even donate, because in my mind I'll pay anyone to keep making great things that I love.

Sorry for the long post, but hopefully people here can give some ideas as well, hope my suggestions don't go to waste.

To Shepard and Tali! (Yes, I'm a Tali-addict, deal with it).

#522
Strafem

Strafem
  • Members
  • 1 messages
We're not done with Leviathan yet. After the Reapers, who's the most dangerous species in the Galaxy?

I say supposedly because who knows if all the Reapers turned up from Dark Space? Maybe there were some stragglers and there's more to come? Maybe there's something else out in Dark Space. Would be a good explanation for why Reapers harvest the cycles' technology... To combat the Dark Space race.

Modifié par Strafem, 04 juin 2013 - 10:01 .


#523
PHGDAL

PHGDAL
  • Members
  • 47 messages

Strafem wrote...

We're not done with Leviathan yet. After the Reapers, who's the most dangerous species in the Galaxy?

I say supposedly because who knows if all the Reapers turned up from Dark Space? Maybe there were some stragglers and there's more to come? Maybe there's something else out in Dark Space. Would be a good explanation for why Reapers harvest the cycles' technology... To combat the Dark Space race.


Bioware could even return to the series' original ending by Drew Karpyshyn, not change the actual ending of the third game, but after the destruction of the Reapers, the new problem the galaxy is faced with could be Dark Energy.

Seriously, Bioware and EA have a lot of possible games that allow Shepard's story to continue. I'm no business-major, but even I know that after killing off a symbol like Shepard the franchise will have problems.

I have no quarrel with seeing some games with different protagonists, but they don't have to completely end Shepard's story to be able to make those games.

Now, I'm sure that despite what many developers have stated, that Shepard's story is over, a company in a capitalist society like ours will be drawn to whatever can acquire money. Continuing Shepard's story is inevitable due to it's money-making opportunities. I would just rather Shepard's continuation be sooner than later. (Don't want to wait many years to find out what happens...)

#524
John Knox

John Knox
  • Members
  • 1 messages
 Mass Effect 4 needs Shepard, without it who knows what might happen. It might turn into another star wars knights of the republic 2 the sith lords. Personally I want to see it go forward with shepard. Shepard is found amongst the ruins of the crucible and helps with the rebuilding of the citadel from earth and goes from there. He finds his loved one ( in my case I choose Tali ) and marries that person. The new enemy to face in the galaxy like mass effect 2 would be mercenary groups and the batarians. Lets say the collectors were not a part of mass effect 2 then your only fighting the mercenary groups. the galaxy once again after lets say a few months of rebuiliding is once again at war withitself. With travel slowed down because the mass effect relays need to be repaired you, these groups (blue suns, eclipse, blood pack and maybe the batarians and rachni) are taking claims to parts of the galaxy where the citadel held a heavy military force until they moved to assist in the battle of earth. I think it would be interesting to see cause just because the Reapers have been destroyed doesnt mean there cant be a Shepard. He fought the geth and assassins in mass effect 1 and mercenaries and protheans in the second one. I  just dont want to see mass effect 4 go down a bad path, theres already so much built into shepards story that its hard to move away from it. Like I said the romance part would be cool too, wouldnt mind a house on rannoch like the apartment on the citadel :P