TallBearNC wrote...
That's why I think people get upset is they think people are homophobic or biphobic. I DO understand people's concerns about story lines being lost, not being immersed.
It's not that they think everyone is homophobic, it's that they want people to be homophobic. That way it is easier for them to play the part of the victim. It's a cop-out and results in discussions devolving into arguments where one side finally throws up their hands stating "You don't agree because you hate gay people!".
Have gay characters in the game. Have bisexual characters in the game. Have straight characters in the game. By all means do that. It's an accurate representation of the kinds of people I will probably run into any time I step out of my front door. Hell, it's an accurate representation of the kinds of people that I have walking in my front door.
I just don't understand this irrational desire to have everyone romance-able by anyone. That makes them less individual characters and more 2 dimensional cardboard cutouts with only a few superficial differences. Maybe 'Male-NPC-A' has absolutely no interest what-so-ever in women, being ultimately more comfortable with other men. Perhaps 'Female-NPC-Y' is able to see a person for who they are and can fall in love without being caught up by their gender.
If you are going to implement a romance system for your game, give it a little more depth and complexity than simply reducing it to a select button combination to get in an any NPC's pants.
Male-Hawke should NOT be able to seduce a lesbian NPC. It's insulting, and screams of chauvinistic statements like "that lesbian just needed the right man to set her straight!".