322 réponses à ce sujet

[Saibh]

Johnsen1972 wrote...

TwistedComplex wrote...

Are you completely ignoring the fact that were in a thread discussing how DA2 got an 8.25/10?

DA2 has, on average, higher scores than DA:O

Are you completly ignoring the fact that DA2 isnt even released yet? How can it have higher scores without been released? You just cant compare it yet. In 1 month maybe.

...Reviews have already come out. Several of them. Don't be silly.

[TwistedComplex]

Johnsen1972 wrote...

TwistedComplex wrote...

Are you completely ignoring the fact that were in a thread discussing how DA2 got an 8.25/10?

DA2 has, on average, higher scores than DA:O

Are you completly ignoring the fact that DA2 isnt even released yet? How can it have higher scores without been released? You just cant compare it yet. In 1 month maybe.

A game doesn't have to be released before it's reviewed

HENCE HOW IT HAS A 94/100 FROM PCGAMER

[Saibh]

moilami wrote...

Disappointed of the score, kids?

We're not even sure if this guy is telling the truth. Don't be condescending, it flatters no one.

[moilami]

Valcutio wrote...

Game informer gives 10s out like they're candy. This isn't good.

Lol, I approve this doom saying. Big time!

I also grant "thread of the week" prize for the OP.

[SorrowAndJoy7]

Does it really matter if it's rpg of the year or not? Does being rpg of the year create +5 enjoyment or something >.>

The year is so stacked it's going to have little to do with which game is better within it's type of rpg and more to do with which type of rpg the majority of reviewers prefer. Such as Open/closed world, Party/solo, Third-Person/First-Person, etc... and of course pure hype and reputation... which is all saying it really doesn't mean anything at all. I doubt Bioware even cares THAT much when they plan to release their two heavy hitters in the same year(whether that actually happens or not we will see)...

[Graunt]

An open world is a type of video game level design concept where a player can freely roam a virtual world.[1]
The term is sometimes used interchangeably with "sandbox" and "free-roaming";[2][3] however, the terms open world and free-roaming describe the game environment itself and allude more to the absence of artificial barriers,[4] in contrast to the invisible walls and loading screens that are common in linear level designs.

The term sandbox refers more to the mechanics of a game and how, as in a physical sandbox, the user is entertained by his ability to play creatively, boundless of artificial structural constraints, and with there being "no right way"[5] of playing the game.

Despite their name, many open world games still enforce restrictions at some points in the game environment,either due to absolute game design limitations or temporary in-game limitations (such as locked areas) imposed by a game's linearity.

So technically no, open world doesn't necessarily mean it's a sandbox game, but in the example of games that have been listed, they are all the same.

Modifié par Graunt, 06 mars 2011 - 11:58 .

[MJRick]

kjdhgfiliuhwe wrote...

Console reviewers are giving it higher scores. No surprise with the amount of work they did to cater to that base. PC reviewers are giving it similar or lower scores, again, no surprise, with the amount of work they did to cater to consoles.

It'll still be an enjoyable game, but it's definitely not going to be rpg of the year in a year that has this many solid rpgs coming out.

Yes we all know ME3 is going to dominate...

[Blacklash93]

Why is everyone assuming this is fake? Even with the gamefaqs thread?

[Johnsen1972]

Ok guys, DA2 is far better then DAO. You got me. But why cant I equip my companions?

[SorrowAndJoy7]

Johnsen1972 wrote...

Are you completly ignoring the fact that DA2 isnt even released yet? How can it have higher scores in average without been released? You just cant compare it yet. Next month maybe. Then we can talk about average reviews. And DAO will win.

Are you basing this off professional reviews or amateur reviews... because basically all Professional reviewers get to play and score it before it is actually released. I have no doubt DA2 will get worse reviews from Amateurs because it will draw the ire of DA:Origins fans who wanted the game to be exactly the same. Something Origins didn't have to worry about because it was the beginning of it's own series.

[TwistedComplex]

Official Xbox Magazine 9/10[22]
PC Gamer UK 94%[23]
PSM 9/10

THEY'RE NOT ALL PERFECT 10s!!

Everyone panic!!!

[CogKeeper]

Official Xbox Magazine 9/10
PC Gamer UK 94%
PSM 9/10
Those are good scores. If you trust the reviewers of course.

[Red_warning]

Any game that scores above 7/10 is a good game, and any game that scores over 8/10 is excellent in my eyes.

[TwistedComplex]

Johnsen1972 wrote...

Ok guys, DA2 is far better then DAO. You got me. But why cant I equip my companions?

Because Bioware

That's why

[SpiderFan1217]

I don't listen to reviewers anymore. Alpha Protocol got two's and I thought it was great.

[Saibh]

Johnsen1972 wrote...

Ok guys, DA2 is far better then DAO. You got me. But why cant I equip my companions?

Why do I always have to agree with my companions in DAO to get anywhere with them?

Modifié par Saibh, 06 mars 2011 - 11:59 .

[Graunt]

Johnsen1972 wrote...

Ok guys, DA2 is far better then DAO. You got me. But why cant I equip my companions?

Because you still can?  Just not armor, but weapons, shields, rings and amulets still work.  

[SpiderFan1217]

TwistedComplex wrote...

Official Xbox Magazine 9/10[22]
PC Gamer UK 94%[23]
PSM 9/10

THEY'RE NOT ALL PERFECT 10s!!

Everyone panic!!!

Quoted for lols!!

Just out of curiosity has DA2 gotten a 10 yet?

[moilami]

This is deffo end of the world now. I mean how do you think I can go to a school when everyone points and laughs at me there saying "he said DA2 would get better reviews than the Witcher 2".

[Saibh]

moilami wrote...

This is deffo end of the world now. I mean how do you think I can go to a school when everyone points and laughs at me there saying "he said DA2 would get better reviews than the Witcher 2".

Yes, yes, we're delusional, you prefer The Witcher, you're still here because you're so much smarter than we are.

[moilami]

I want group hug now!

[Wynne]

Saibh wrote...

 And, yes, the PC version of DAO got low scores.

Uh... what? I'm counting 66 out of 67 positive reviews on Metacritic for DAO. The PC average is higher than the PS3 or Xbox360, too.


Anybody who thought a game besides Skyrim would have a chance at winning major awards is insane. Fair or not, Skyrim is the juggernaut. It will sell better than anything whether it deserves to or not.

[I Like Cats And]

that's honestly what i was kind of expecting/ hoping for. They rated it high enough being objective, which means I'm probally going to rate it higher. And of course it's going to be lower then Origins cause that game was perfection (damn near).

[Scoutyo]

Blacklash93 wrote...

Why is everyone assuming this is fake? Even with the gamefaqs thread?

I don't have any idea either way, but it's always possible that the OP saw the gamefaqs thread (which was created yesterday) and posted here based on that thread. 

The gamefaqs thread is pretty devoid of info too, though.  The OP there just says the score, that they kept comparing the console version to the PC version and that they said the replay value was high.  That could be fake.  

Who knows?  We'll all be making up our own minds in a few days.