74 réponses à ce sujet

[iamrawn]

Seriously?! Gamespot, IGN, Gametrailers? Is EA keeping the review hidden cos it's bad or saink?

[Sam-_-Fisher]

The game comes out tomorrow...

[Cless Godhard]

Heheheh, something is a little wierd, but i will wait untill tomorrow.

[Moaradin]

PCgammer is more reliable than any of those, and theirs is up.

[Naqey]

Sam-_-Fisher wrote...

The game comes out tomorrow...

and reviews never get published before the actual release ? true story

[Sidac]

lol...IGN...AHAHAHAHAHA, Thanks. I needed a laugh.

[Randomjob]

iamrawn wrote...

Seriously?! Gamespot, IGN, Gametrailers? Is EA keeping the review hidden cos it's bad or saink?

I'd be more worried if there WERE early reviews, as they're almost always positive and clearly paid off to allow the review site an early lead on releasing the review.

Just like all media, reviews usually come out on the day off.  Same thing with movies - usually they don't come out until the day the movie is actually out.

[kingjezza]

Moaradin wrote...

PCgammer is more reliable than any of those, and theirs is up.

They are all just one persons opinion at the end of the day. I don't consider the PCGamer review as that reliable personally as I'm not massivly keen on the reviewer who did it.

[Sidac]

Really, you shouldnt consider anyone's review unless they are all 1/10 or something. One person's trash is another person's treasure.

Modifié par Sidac, 07 mars 2011 - 07:38 .

[MorrigansLove]

let's all sing around the campfire and wait until sun up...

[mesmerizedish]

No reviews. EA wouldn't shell out the money for bribes, so all the sites and pubs refused to vet the game.

[the_esherick]

Its not a bad idea to look at the reviews to get a general idea of the quality of the game. However, don't take reviews as the authority of how a game is. Ultimately a reviewer is just one person with an opinion.

[apoc_reg]

We'll I've yet to hear a bad response from those that have played the full build just in reading coments etc etc.

In general im pretty convinced DA2 is gonna be a hell of a game at the end of the day, just one with bitter pills for the purist thrown in!

[Darji]

the_esherick wrote...

Its not a bad idea to look at the reviews to get a general idea of the quality of the game. However, don't take reviews as the authority of how a game is. Ultimately a reviewer is just one person with an opinion.

Same goes for people who played it already. But if you hear the same things over and over again like the same locations with the same layout over and over again  its not really confincing to buy this rushed games (atleast it seems that way) fpr a full price.

positive reviews could change that but not if they are comming out hours after the official release.  And honestly the PC gamer review is full of **** and really reeks like bull****. And the reason they got it out so early was the more as positive review.

[MorrigansLove]

k

[Boss Fog]

ah yes, any review that doesn't match anyone's pre conceived notions of the game must either be..

a) complete BS
OR
a bias review w/ a bribe attached

Somehow I think that even if all the reviews were positive, the nay sayers would still be nay saying.

[Gavinthelocust]

Moaradin wrote...

PCgammer is more reliable than any of those, and theirs is up.

They named Oblivion one of the greatest PC games of all time.
Seriously **** reviewers.

[templar706]

 Ah yes 'a review' a supposed measure of how good quality a video game is.
We have dismissed those claims 
Reviews are just opinions, people have different opinions. There are exceptions, when the game is blatantly amazing or blatantly the worst game ever.

[Darji]

TelvanniWarlord wrote...

ah yes, any review that doesn't match anyone's pre conceived notions of the game must either be..

a) complete BS
OR
a bias review w/ a bribe attached

Somehow I think that even if all the reviews were positive, the nay sayers would still be nay saying.

No but not most reivews thats get out early and have such a high score a bull****. We already know the actions developer take for good reviews and how you can publish your review earlier than others.

Many policies are if you rate it 90 or so you can release it early if not you have to wait.

[Chris Priestly]

iamrawn wrote...

Seriously?! Gamespot, IGN, Gametrailers? Is EA keeping the review hidden cos it's bad or saink?

I love this.

Yes, it IS a big conspiracy. You are SO smart to have caught us. Well done Mulder.

[Saibh]

These are all of the reviews thus far.

Most reviews don't come out until release day.

[randName]

I'm just waiting for Z.punctuation, the rest are moot.

[TheJediSaint]

Well to be fair, Canadians are a crafty lot.

[el-jasho]

Chris Priestly wrote...

iamrawn wrote...

Seriously?! Gamespot, IGN, Gametrailers? Is EA keeping the review hidden cos it's bad or saink?

I love this.

Yes, it IS a big conspiracy. You are SO smart to have caught us. Well done Mulder.

Well I detect sarcasm in your post Chris. Haha im SO smart its unreal

[Boss Fog]

Darji wrote...

TelvanniWarlord wrote...

ah yes, any review that doesn't match anyone's pre conceived notions of the game must either be..

a) complete BS
OR
a bias review w/ a bribe attached


Somehow I think that even if all the reviews were positive, the nay sayers would still be nay saying.

No but not most reivews thats get out early and have such a high score a bull****. We already know the actions developer take for good reviews and how you can publish your review earlier than others.

Many policies are if you rate it 90 or so you can release it early if not you have to wait.

Not the case always; one German review gave the game an 87 and was pretty harsh in it's specifics.