53 réponses à ce sujet

[astrallite]

Leonick91 wrote...

astrallite wrote...

Not sure what you "should" be getting...Bioware's engines have always been harder to run than Crysis >_>

Ok that is one very harsh insult against bioware
Crysis is the most badly optimized game in recent PC history

Crysis is not badly optimized, it's actually one of the best examples of linear GPU scaling.

A single high end card like a 6970 can play Crysis at 1080p at Very High + AA at 35-50fps today. Crossfire or SLI and you get 70% scaling.

Even in the most demanding scenes Crysis stays above 20fps with a high end setup...I've seen Dragon Age 2 craw to single digits quite often.

Crysis is demanding because it's the best looking game on the market...DA2 on the other hand...

Crysis 2 on equal settings (medium and same resolution in both games) perform better than Crysis

Crysis 2 is a console port and only runs on DX9. Crysis and Crysis 2 perform very similarly in DX9 mode.

Modifié par astrallite, 08 mars 2011 - 09:54 .

[XOGHunter246]

I am looking forward to getting my copy on Friday played the demo liked how they have changed the battling makes it more of a challenge. I have to say they really made Archers like gods unlike DAO.

[Yammen]

Better than the demo? It's 10 times worse than the performance on the demo, I can't even play the game..

[Koichireal]

I've got an Phenom 2 955be oc @ 3.6 Ghz, a EVGA superclocked Geforce gtx 580 and 8 gb ram and i cant run it at vhigh T.T.
Settings are 1920x1080, Dx11, High, SSAO of, HQ textures. after i downloaded the beta driver from nvidia it got a bit better (no black textures at vhigh, but still poor)