Aller au contenu

Photo

The Anders Thread: Flash Fic Contest! Details on Pg. 2274


57020 réponses à ce sujet

#34326
highcastle

highcastle
  • Members
  • 1 963 messages

Upsettingshorts wrote...

Oh I understand. I think the difference I'm trying to get across is the idea of commenting as a player on a forum versus perhaps, what it would be reasonable to think if we lived in Thedas.

That probably got confused with the whole "it doesn't matter" part of my post. The idea is, it doesn't matter in the sense that we don't have to pick a side and stick with it. We can move in and out of whatever perspective we want to analyze fiction from at will, be it Anders, or Leliana, or the Divine, or the Templars, or your random Kirkwall citizen because it's not real.

It's possible to do this in real life too, but it takes an uncommon amount of critical thinking skills and a dedication to objectivity that most people are uncomfortable with - and even then I have doubts as to whether any of us are capable of shaking off our biases fully. It's simply easier with fiction - because there are no stakes.

In short, there's nothing really that ought to prevent us from - for example - switching from defending the Templars to defending the mages within the space of a page on a forum thread.


Absolutely. I think that's actually the benefit of fiction. It makes it easier to consider a perspective outside of our norms, especially in a game like DA2 which moves the setting outside reality and thus makes it easier to consider more objectively.

However, I'm not sure I agree with you about there being nothing to prevent us from defending the templars versus the mages. While we're not citizens of Kirkwall facing the threat of either side, both sides represent something in the real world. It's arguable what precisely they represent. I think that depends largely on your individual world view and personal experiences. For me, though, the templars represent a system of oppression that, while it originated from necessity, grew into something else entirely.

I should also mention I'm a criminology major in addition to a lit major (never dual major; the workload will kill you). I see in the templars a lot of the failings of the correctional system. It might have arrisen out of a need to protect society from mages, but in the end it's creating as many problems as it's solving. It doesn't keep mages from turning to forbidden magic. Indeed, it actually provides an environment that fosters the use of illicit techniques and teaches mages to better keep this skills a secret. In the same vein, prisons like Pelican Bay in CA unintentionally teach convicts to be better criminals. The inmates themselves will tell you this, as will the guards. The environment fosters violence and the need for secrecy.

This is starting to take a bit of a tangental turn. What I'm trying to say is that when you attach real world connections to fictional ones, you make the stakes real for you. And while a fictional setting and especially a role playing game gives you the opportunity to see the other side's perspective, it doesn't make that side right or defensible. Some actions are beyond defense. I'm not saying the templars fall into that category. Just the fact we're having this debate means they make some good points to someone. But for me personally, I don't see the merit in defending them either in Thedas or in the real world.

Edit: Top again. Take more m!Hawke/Anders hotness.

Posted Image

Modifié par highcastle, 28 avril 2011 - 02:34 .


#34327
upsettingshorts

upsettingshorts
  • Members
  • 13 950 messages
Fair enough. My major(s) have been, at one time or another, history and political science. I have leveled up quite a bit - so to speak - in moral relativism (and even prescriptive political realism!). In any case, it seems a good point at which to agree to disagree.

Edit:  Because I couldn't find a simple explanation of prescriptive PR in a Google search - for anyone interested in that that means I'll give the short version here.  Basically political realism says that states (like, Germany or France - governments that is) do not operate under a moral imperative but instead pursue rational self-interests.  Descriptive PR basically describe - hence the name - that this is just how governments end up working.  Prescriptive PR goes so far as to say that this is how they should work.  

Modifié par Upsettingshorts, 28 avril 2011 - 02:52 .


#34328
Rinji the Bearded

Rinji the Bearded
  • Members
  • 3 613 messages
The iconoclasm line isn't spoilery considering it was a throw-away line in DA:A.

Upsettingshorts wrote...

That probably got confused with the whole
"it doesn't matter" part of my post. The idea is, it doesn't matter in
the sense that we don't have to pick a side and stick with it.
We can move in and out of whatever perspective we want to analyze
fiction from at will, be it Anders, or Leliana, or the Divine, or the
Templars, or your random Kirkwall citizen because it's not real and we aren't in fact any of these people, nor do we really have anything tangible to do with them.

It's
possible to do this in real life too, but it takes an uncommon amount
of critical thinking skills and a dedication to objectivity that many
people are uncomfortable with - and even then I have doubts as to
whether any of us are capable of shaking off our biases fully. It's
simply easier with fiction - because there are no stakes.

In
short, I don't think there's anything really that ought to prevent us
from - for example - switching from defending the Templars to defending
the mages within the space of a page on a forum thread.


Yes, very true.  I have an extreme bias against organized religion, however, since Thedas is not real, my decisions have no real stake in anything tangible.  I definitely have my own opinions about the Chantry, but I think I can stand back and see why a certain character, Leliana in this case, makes the decisions that she does and etc.  I may not personally like it, but again, this is a fictional world.  I'm not so objective in the real world because I am simply too uncomfortable with it, due to upbringing and all that.

When I first started playing the game I lacked that objectivity, being blindly devoted to the mages, but after finishing it I could definitely approach the topic more objectively.  However due to the nature of forums I don't think that discussions of that nature can happen very often.

highcastle wrote...

I should also
mention I'm a criminology major in addition to a lit major (never dual
major; the workload will kill you). I see in the templars a lot of the
failings of the correctional system. It might have arrisen out of a need
to protect society from mages, but in the end it's creating as many
problems as it's solving. It doesn't keep mages from turning to
forbidden magic. Indeed, it actually provides an environment that
fosters the use of illicit techniques and teaches mages to better keep
this skills a secret. In the same vein, prisons like Pelican Bay in CA
unintentionally teach convicts to be better criminals. The inmates
themselves will tell you this, as will the guards. The environment
fosters violence and the need for secrecy.


As someone who works for a Judge in a criminal court I can agree with that.  I think the justice system tends to recycle the same people over and over again, and it's hard to pinpoint exactly where that problem starts.  Is it because they just lack the ability to change themselves, or is it "the system" that does not support them to do so?  I could think of several cases where either might have been true.

tl;dr DAMNIT ADAM HOWDEN STOP BEING CUTE, WHAT ARE YOU DOING HERE

Modifié par RinjiRenee, 28 avril 2011 - 02:49 .


#34329
highcastle

highcastle
  • Members
  • 1 963 messages
*offers handshake* Much respect for the history major. I was always fascinated by it and considered it for a major before Lit/Criminology grabbed me. The papers and research involved in history are...impressive, to say the least. Not that you don't write a lot in Lit or even CJ. I'm doing my thesis on the correctional system actually, which is probably why I'm seeing so many templars=the-current-state-of-American-prison parallels. I don't even know if the writers intended it, but they're there.

And, er...staying on topic...Andersbutt.

#34330
AnniLau

AnniLau
  • Members
  • 1 478 messages

RinjiRenee wrote...

DAMNIT ADAM HOWDEN STOP BEING CUTE, WHAT ARE YOU DOING HERE


Nooooo, I think he should definitely continue being cute! It's just, Anders' smirk gets so much love here, I figured Adam's at least deserved a mention. :D

#34331
Inzhuna

Inzhuna
  • Members
  • 1 928 messages

highcastle wrote...

Except, historically speaking, localized violent responses don't often end very well. They tend to escalate and feed other resistence movements. For evidence of this, look at what's happening right now in Egypt and Libya. And while Leliana's faith might not be the sole contributing factor for inability to emphathize with the opposition, it still plays a role.

The Chantry is a religion based on domination and crusades. Andraste led one against the Imperium, so now it's the norm for them to go to war against any who challenge their faith. See also: the Dales.

I won't deny that Anders is a radical as well, and that he's just as blind to opposition to his side. This is quite obviously the case. The difference for me is that I agree with his goals (though not his methods), while I don't support the Chantry at all. And that absolutely colors my view on the situation and makes me biased. So...yeah. Sorry about that.


This so much. I'm a pacifist at heart so the idea that revolutionary goals justify mass scale violence doesn't sit well with me. Plus researching for my dissertation I came across a lot of cases in support of peaceful political change through compromise. Violence usually bring the fastest change but that change is never stable, and the situation often goes worse. I just can't see how Anders' actions will bring about positive change for the mages. Hawke was already very powerful, s/he should have used her/his influence to remove Meredith from her position and work to achieve even more from there. But... yeah. That's just me, I realise a lot of people here view blowing up of the Chantry as a necessary evil.

--
Unrelated and off-topic: while catching up, this amused me to no end:

Dunizel wrote...
-snip-
Karazhan has my undying love.
-snip-


Apparently it's some kind of citadel in WoW? Cause that my surname, haha. :o

#34332
berelinde

berelinde
  • Members
  • 8 282 messages

AnniLau wrote...

RinjiRenee wrote...

DAMNIT ADAM HOWDEN STOP BEING CUTE, WHAT ARE YOU DOING HERE


Nooooo, I think he should definitely continue being cute! It's just, Anders' smirk gets so much love here, I figured Adam's at least deserved a mention. :D

Whoa, wait a minute...

Are you telling me that the photograph at the bottom of the last page is the actor who voiced Anders?

Daaaamn! Why do I have to read this shht while I'm at work?

#34333
upsettingshorts

upsettingshorts
  • Members
  • 13 950 messages
Nonviolent actions can work in cases where it isn't theoretically possible/reasonable for your political opponents to simply kill all of you just to be rid of the headache.

I don't think the British would have murdered the entire Indian subcontinent, for example, just to keep the land.

But would the Templars hesitate to end the life of every mage in Thedas under the right set of circumstances? Probably not.

One of my issues with Anders' actions - switching perspectives again, don't mind me - is that no matter how reasonable they may be given the situation in Kirkwall they inevitably ripple throughout all of Thedas. Given that he failed to even predict the consequences of his destruction of the Chantry within the very city he had lived for seven years - given his banter ingame - I really doubt he has even begun to fathom what his actions mean for the known world.

Modifié par Upsettingshorts, 28 avril 2011 - 03:01 .


#34334
highcastle

highcastle
  • Members
  • 1 963 messages

RinjiRenee wrote...

As someone who works for a Judge in a criminal court I can agree with that.  I think the justice system tends to recycle the same people over and over again, and it's hard to pinpoint exactly where that problem starts.  Is it because they just lack the ability to change themselves, or is it "the system" that does not support them to do so?  I could think of several cases where either might have been true.


Ah, don't tell me these things! You'll only encourage me further! :D

On a serious note, it's interesting to hear this from someone who actually works in the real world justice system. One of the downsides to seeing it from academia is that you're outside the system, so it's easier to make high-minded statements like "the system failed them" when you haven't actually seen the system at all. I'm hoping to get some kind of internship either in the courts or in the correctional system itself soon enough to give myself a bit more real world knowledge. So far, the closest I've come is conduct a few interviews with inmates and the guards at the local prison. It's fascinating, but I'm sure I still have an outsider's perspective.

#34335
Herr Uhl

Herr Uhl
  • Members
  • 13 465 messages

Upsettingshorts wrote...

Nonviolent actions can work in cases where it isn't theoretically possible/reasonable for your political opponents to simply kill all of you just to be rid of the headache.

I don't think the British would have murdered the entire Indian subcontinent, for example, just to keep the land.

But would the Templars hesitate to end the life of every mage in Thedas under the right set of circumstances? Probably not.


That the Imperial chantry exists suggests that there are peaceful means to revolt. They didn't fight the chantry, they merely changed, and putting a mage as divine was the thing that made the other parts of the chantry react.

Of course, this is my interpretation of the scant lore that there is on the subject. But I don't think it came to be in a violent revolution.

#34336
Guest_ElleMullineux_*

Guest_ElleMullineux_*
  • Guests

Upsettingshorts wrote...

Nonviolent actions can work in cases where it isn't theoretically possible/reasonable for your political opponents to simply kill all of you just to be rid of the headache.

I don't think the British would have murdered the entire Indian subcontinent, for example, just to keep the land.

But would the Templars hesitate to end the life of every mage in Thedas under the right set of circumstances? Probably not.

One of my issues with Anders' actions - switching perspectives again, don't mind me - is that no matter how reasonable they may be given the situation in Kirkwall they inevitably ripple throughout all of Thedas. Given that he failed to even predict the consequences of his destruction of the Chantry within the very city he had lived for seven years - given his banter ingame - I really doubt he has even begun to fathom what his actions mean for the known world.


I like to think he knew the wider consequences, or at least the effect he hoped they would have. It's the immediate and the personal that he didn't consider as he'd hoped to not be around for them.  Posted Image

#34337
upsettingshorts

upsettingshorts
  • Members
  • 13 950 messages
I basically equate the thought process of Anders to the Liberatores. The Liberatores - self annointed - were the Senators who conspired to murder the tyrant Julius Caesar.

The short version is they assumed that once the tyrant was dead double rainbows would shine out from his corpse and the idealized Roman Republic they all adored would magically be restored.

This didn't happen, many of them ended up dead, and Rome was never a Republic again.

Anders thinks what he's doing will free the mages. And it might, but if A is the status quo, and C is freed mages... I really don't think he thought too much about B. Which is the really uncomfortable and violent bit.

Modifié par Upsettingshorts, 28 avril 2011 - 03:12 .


#34338
Herr Uhl

Herr Uhl
  • Members
  • 13 465 messages

highcastle wrote...

I'm doing my thesis on the correctional system actually, which is probably why I'm seeing so many templars=the-current-state-of-American-prison parallels. I don't even know if the writers intended it, but they're there.


This makes me think of when a lot of people assumed the Qunari to be a patriarcal society due to that Sten was baffled at female warriors. Which is wrong, they're equal opportunity oppressors.

Anywho, it is easy to find parallels if you search for them.

#34339
highcastle

highcastle
  • Members
  • 1 963 messages

ElleMullineux wrote...

Upsettingshorts wrote...


One of my issues with Anders' actions - switching perspectives again, don't mind me - is that no matter how reasonable they may be given the situation in Kirkwall they inevitably ripple throughout all of Thedas. Given that he failed to even predict the consequences of his destruction of the Chantry within the very city he had lived for seven years - given his banter ingame - I really doubt he has even begun to fathom what his actions mean for the known world.


I like to think he knew the wider consequences, or at least the effect he hoped they would have. It's the immediate and the personal that he didn't consider as he'd hoped to not be around for them.  Posted Image


This was my interpretation as well. Anders implies in the Gallows that he knows change won't come fast or easily. The whole "a hundred years from now someone like me will love someone like you and there will be no templars to tear them apart" (paraphrased from memory) seems to say he knows change will a long time coming and hard fought. It's seeing the immediate death toll that rather shocks him. 

And let's also not forget he seems to be thinking of the big picture and the long term. He thinks he'll be dead when he blows up the Chantry. He probably didn't consider the immediate consequences because he never thought he'd see them.

And before I get myself embroiled in another debate, I really have to go work on my final exam. I'm too much of a procrastinator to keep checking this thread. You guys are like the Godfather. Every time I think I'm out, you pull me back in! ;)

Edit: See, making a liar of myself already:

Herr Uhl wrote...

highcastle wrote...

I'm
doing my thesis on the correctional system actually, which is probably
why I'm seeing so many templars=the-current-state-of-American-prison
parallels. I don't even know if the writers intended it, but they're
there.


This makes me think of when a lot of people
assumed the Qunari to be a patriarcal society due to that Sten was
baffled at female warriors. Which is wrong, they're equal opportunity
oppressors.

Anywho, it is easy to find parallels if you search for them.



It's one thing to assume an entire fictional people are one way because of a line in a game. It's another to relate a fictional idea to a real world one. This is the purpose of literary criticism. And to a degree, author intent  doesn't matter. Tolkien may not have intended the WWII or Christian imagery in Lord of the Rings, but both are still present. The subconscious is a marvelous thing, and some of that symbolism may have been inserted unintentionally.

Okay, that's really it. I'm leaving, I swear. Good night, folks!

Modifié par highcastle, 28 avril 2011 - 03:12 .


#34340
Dunizel

Dunizel
  • Members
  • 684 messages

berelinde wrote...

AnniLau wrote...

RinjiRenee wrote...

DAMNIT ADAM HOWDEN STOP BEING CUTE, WHAT ARE YOU DOING HERE


Nooooo, I think he should definitely continue being cute! It's just, Anders' smirk gets so much love here, I figured Adam's at least deserved a mention. :D

Whoa, wait a minute...

Are you telling me that the photograph at the bottom of the last page is the actor who voiced Anders?

Daaaamn! Why do I have to read this shht while I'm at work?

Oh yes, it is, and if you look at some of his post on Twitter , he seems such a nice guy too (with cats too!)!
I have to admit both Howden and Emery are great...I checked a bit Emery on facebook, and he answer to everyone, even changed his profile picture with a portrait made for him by tankgirly...

#34341
AnniLau

AnniLau
  • Members
  • 1 478 messages

berelinde wrote...

AnniLau wrote...

RinjiRenee wrote...

DAMNIT ADAM HOWDEN STOP BEING CUTE, WHAT ARE YOU DOING HERE


Nooooo, I think he should definitely continue being cute! It's just, Anders' smirk gets so much love here, I figured Adam's at least deserved a mention. :D

Whoa, wait a minute...

Are you telling me that the photograph at the bottom of the last page is the actor who voiced Anders?

Daaaamn! Why do I have to read this shht while I'm at work?


Yep. Want to know where to stalk his Twitter too? :P

#34342
Herr Uhl

Herr Uhl
  • Members
  • 13 465 messages

highcastle wrote...

It's one thing to assume an entire fictional people are one way because of a line in a game. It's another to relate a fictional idea to a real world one. This is the purpose of literary criticism. And to a degree, author intent  doesn't matter. Tolkien may not have intended the WWII or Christian imagery in Lord of the Rings, but both are still present. The subconscious is a marvelous thing, and some of that symbolism may have been inserted unintentionally.

Okay, that's really it. I'm leaving, I swear. Good night, folks!


The Qunari thing was to point out that preconceptions changed how people concieved what was not explained. If you've been studying or hearing a lot about a certain situation, you tend to find parallels to that. Which is why **** paralells are so prevalent amongst people. You've been studying the american legal system intently, I doubt that the mostly Canadian team of writers had that in mind when designing it. Of course, this works both ways, and authors may give overtones from personal memory without thinking on it, but I don't think that the american legal system had such an influence on them.

#34343
Sialater

Sialater
  • Members
  • 12 600 messages

Upsettingshorts wrote...

I basically equate the thought process of Anders to the Liberatores. The Liberatores - self annointed - were the Senators who conspired to murder the tyrant Julius Caesar.

The short version is they assumed that once the tyrant was dead double rainbows would shine out from his corpse and the idealized Roman Republic they all adored would magically be restored.

This didn't happen, many of them ended up dead, and Rome was never a Republic again.

Anders thinks what he's doing will free the mages. And it might, but if A is the status quo, and C is freed mages... I really don't think he thought too much about B. Which is the really uncomfortable and violent bit.


In this, you and I agree.  He's an idealist.  Worse, a sexy romantic idealist.  He's also NOT a tactician.

#34344
Sialater

Sialater
  • Members
  • 12 600 messages

Herr Uhl wrote...

highcastle wrote...

It's one thing to assume an entire fictional people are one way because of a line in a game. It's another to relate a fictional idea to a real world one. This is the purpose of literary criticism. And to a degree, author intent  doesn't matter. Tolkien may not have intended the WWII or Christian imagery in Lord of the Rings, but both are still present. The subconscious is a marvelous thing, and some of that symbolism may have been inserted unintentionally.

Okay, that's really it. I'm leaving, I swear. Good night, folks!


The Qunari thing was to point out that preconceptions changed how people concieved what was not explained. If you've been studying or hearing a lot about a certain situation, you tend to find parallels to that. Which is why **** paralells are so prevalent amongst people. You've been studying the american legal system intently, I doubt that the mostly Canadian team of writers had that in mind when designing it. Of course, this works both ways, and authors may give overtones from personal memory without thinking on it, but I don't think that the american legal system had such an influence on them.


Symbolism is in the eye of the beholder.  It's generally meaningless because unless the author states this intent, it's far too subjective.

#34345
signcherie

signcherie
  • Members
  • 292 messages

Herr Uhl wrote...

highcastle wrote...

It's one thing to assume an entire fictional people are one way because of a line in a game. It's another to relate a fictional idea to a real world one. This is the purpose of literary criticism. And to a degree, author intent doesn't matter. Tolkien may not have intended the WWII or Christian imagery in Lord of the Rings, but both are still present. The subconscious is a marvelous thing, and some of that symbolism may have been inserted unintentionally.

Okay, that's really it. I'm leaving, I swear. Good night, folks!


The Qunari thing was to point out that preconceptions changed how people concieved what was not explained. If you've been studying or hearing a lot about a certain situation, you tend to find parallels to that. Which is why **** paralells are so prevalent amongst people. You've been studying the american legal system intently, I doubt that the mostly Canadian team of writers had that in mind when designing it. Of course, this works both ways, and authors may give overtones from personal memory without thinking on it, but I don't think that the american legal system had such an influence on them.


If I was going to write a work of fiction involving a fantasy prison for mages, I would do research into real world prison systems--the best ones and the worst ones. Not necessarily American prisons, but I'm sure there would be similarities between prison systems in various countries. (An admitted point of ignorance for me, I know nothing about prison systems.) I'd be surprised if the writers didn't do this at least to some extent.

And anyway, if the similarities are there, it doesn't matter if the writers intended them or not, does it? It's still a useful point for analyzing the story world and its possibilities.

I guess I'm not quite sure what you're trying to say? Everyone does have different knowledge and experience which they will bring to their interpretation of a literary work. That doesn't make their interpretations wrong. It makes the possibilities richer. I, personally, find highcastle's insight extremely valuable in forming an understanding of Anders and the mage situation in general. It's another perspective for me to examine what the writers have given us.

*hopes that makes sense*

#34346
kromify

kromify
  • Members
  • 1 292 messages

signcherie wrote...

If I was going to write a work of fiction involving a fantasy prison for mages, I would do research into real world prison systems--the best ones and the worst ones. Not necessarily American prisons, but I'm sure there would be similarities between prison systems in various countries. (An admitted point of ignorance for me, I know nothing about prison systems.) I'd be surprised if the writers didn't do this at least to some extent.

*hopes that makes sense*


look up the zimbardo experiment from the 60's. it's pretty famous and might give you an insight

#34347
Guest_ElleMullineux_*

Guest_ElleMullineux_*
  • Guests
To bring everything squarely back to the pretty... (and seeing as I finish in 45 minutes - and can go home and carry on playing again)! Is there any fan art with his hair down? It must be gloriously chin length and sexy. I need proof for the train ride home. Posted Image

#34348
Anarya

Anarya
  • Members
  • 5 552 messages
Facetome 6 after a bit of a hiatus.

#34349
Dunizel

Dunizel
  • Members
  • 684 messages

Anarya wrote...

Facetome 6 after a bit of a hiatus.

Guest star Jethann XD

Facetome is so awesome, thank you <3

Modifié par Dunizel, 28 avril 2011 - 03:58 .


#34350
Anarya

Anarya
  • Members
  • 5 552 messages
I heart Jethann!