1 They both have lofty goals
2 They have both dealt with daemons spirits In Anders case he has become possessed by justice and yet in some way feels he can tell Merrill that she is a fool for trusting a demon and that justice is in some way different. To which Merrill tells Anders “there's no such thing as a good spirit” this makes sense as a demon spirit is the embodiment of a human trait or emotion. And if you think about it any single emotion can be destructive if it becomes dominant in someone’s personality weather that be love, hate,faith or a sense of justice.
3 there actions can both end in the loss of innocent life the only difference is that there is no way to prevent the loss of life when it comes down to Anders. And also Merrill didn't intend for any of it to happen the way it did where as Anders had every intermission of doing what he
did and even lied to Hawke in order to get his/her help.
This is not meant as a dig and as I do like him but this is just how I see it so what do you all thing how do you see things differently or do you agree? Please don't dismiss this as a Anders bashing or in turn make this into a Merrill bashing This is just my point of view I'd like to get yours and read you arguments for and against.
Thank you
Modifié par christrek1982, 09 mai 2011 - 08:42 .





Retour en haut




