ademska wrote...
i bet he is terrible at wicked grace
Even the dog is better at playing cards than Anders. Varric said it- so...it must be true yes?
ademska wrote...
i bet he is terrible at wicked grace
Totally wish I could offer the ancestral basement for apostate housing/clinic expansion. Though I was rather surprised to learn that it does double duty as a hellmouth in the Arwegian Aspect thingy in Act 3. Talk about lack of consistency. The floorplan isn't even the same!ReiSilver wrote...
Does anyone else wish they could invite Anders to use the Hawke estate basement when they're not romancing him? I played a Hawke who was just-friends with Anders, with no interest in him romantically, but it just seemed weird to me when back in act 1 the Hawke Estate basement was pretty huge, if Hawke didn't want Anders moving into his bedroom there was still all that space he could use. My Hawke would have totally been ok with that, helping a friend and fellow apostate out when the Templars are worrying him.
In fact there would probably have been room for half the companions to room in the Hawke Estate... and then we could have a sitcom!
ejoslin wrote...
ipgd wrote...
It's not that much of a shocker. I mean, he spent 3 years trying to not bang Hawke and telegraphs his clingy dependancy in a big way. Just imagine him as that 15 year old girl who loses her virginity to a guy who doesn't call her back and that's Anders's emotional state after you refuse him there.Addai67 wrote...
It's very understandable he'd be hurt. I was expecting something like "you're probably right, you should stay away from me." The YOU BETRAYED ME was quite a shocker. I deliberately chose the line that said "I'm not ready" rather than "lol sucker, see you." And really there was no discussion of moving in prior to that, you only just slept together the first time. Although granted, all Hawke's lines were pretty much "we'll be together forever and ever!"
I should just shut up now.
I took him asking to move in so completely differently than what is being discussed here. To me it seemed both manipulative and sleazy. IIRC (and it's been a few months since I played) it went something like,
"I love you. I've spent three years aching for you every night! Really sweetheart, I mean it! Ummm, btw baby, I'm having some issues with my place at the moment and I really can't stay there so I need another place to crash. Can I move in with you?" This is a sleazy guy move that more than one friend of mine has fallen for. And his reaction if you turn him down is totally in line with it being sleazy rather than loving.
And unfortunately, the women I know who have fallen for that really sounded kind of the same as Hawke did when talking about their new man :/
Modifié par CulturalGeekGirl, 14 juin 2011 - 03:20 .
Modifié par LT123, 14 juin 2011 - 03:22 .
CulturalGeekGirl wrote...
BLUFFING IS UNJUST.
Yeah, I think I'm back around to the "I just don't like the game period" conclusion. I said upthread that I had to wink at some things with Fenris, though found his romance more tolerable due to the personality difference- I can take standoffish better than clingy. But really none of the romances appeal to me that much.SurelyForth wrote...
Addai67 wrote...
It's very understandable he'd be hurt. I was expecting something like "you're probably right, you should stay away from me." The YOU BETRAYED ME was quite a shocker. I deliberately chose the line that said "I'm not ready" rather than "lol sucker, see you." And really there was no discussion of moving in prior to that, you only just slept together the first time. Although granted, all Hawke's lines were pretty much "we'll be together forever and ever!"
I should just shut up now.
Although I should also shut up, too, I won't. LOL
He basically gives you one last out before he sleeps with you- you can send him away before sex. If you turn him away then, he takes it well.
And you're acting like these things are meant to be taken at face value. Him asking to move in immediately after sex is a game mechanic...he and Merrill move in (because what Hawke with a heart would leave them in their hovels for three years?) and BW was too cheap to give them another conversation to work it out. The fact that they don't officially show up until Act 3 makes it clear that it's supposed to be viewed as a more natural progression than it actually is in game.
Also, I guess I'm childish/weird because I really don't mind Anders asking to move in there, and Fenris blowing Hawke off and refusing to talk about it FOR THREE YEARS makes me want to punch him a little.
CulturalGeekGirl wrote...
@Hill-Hurwitz, LT123, pretty much everyone who has said something nice to me here.
Thanks all. I always mean to actually respond to people who say nice things, but then I think "first, I'll write this two line response to another post" and then it's 11:45pm and where did all the time go?
Also, thanks everyone here for all the great fanfic. Seriously, now I think the version of Anders who exists in game is just a seed for an even awesomer one who lives in the collective unconscious of all Anders fans... that guy is usually a bit more of an obviously smooth transition from Awakening Anders, too.
I've cleaned out three of the major posters here... read everything Anders-related in their various libraries, so I'm on the hunt again. I'm extremely picky (which is why my friend could never get me to read any other fanfiction), but so many people write Anders so well and hrrrng.
You guys are my second favorite thread on the Bioware Boards (sorry, the Garrus thread will always be my first love.)
Modifié par LT123, 14 juin 2011 - 03:49 .
Modifié par beckaliz, 14 juin 2011 - 03:58 .
ademska wrote...
maxernst wrote...
To be honest, he doesn't trust Merrill completely and avoided using her in Kirkwall in Act One. The problem with Anders is not that I'm afraid he'll be found out by the Templars as Anders, it's that he clearly warns you that he's not always able to stay under control. My Hawke is not about to go wandering around town with somebody who might go into a psychotic killing spree at the sight of Templars. And as far as my Hawke is concerned, his killing the mage proves that distrust was justified.
The other problem is that while Anders says he doesn't know where he ends and Justice begins and implies that it's different from simple posession, I can't see any evidence of that. From the viewpoint of an external observer, his behavior isn't any different from Connor's, except that Anders is in control more often than Connor. When Justice takes over, Anders has no memory of what has transpired, and the mage killing in Act 2 suggests to me that Justice's understanding of what goes on when Anders is in control is pretty sketchy, as well. That doesn't really suggest to me two personalities that are integrated and in communication.
okay, but think about it this way: over the course of the six years hawke knows anders, until the chantry climax he only definitively loses control, like not subject to interpretation, once. twice, if you rival him in a romance following the Justice quest. that's one, possibly two instances in the entire six years hawke knows him.
every other instance of justice emerging (that is to say, anders turning kind of blue) is very subject to interpretation. you see it as justice taking control, but many other people on this board including myself consider that their dialogue lines are recorded in tandem. they speak in symbolic unison, and justice's goals are anders' goals.
connor, on the other hand, is possessed and cannot control his actions. he does not want to hurt his family or the staff, and the demon forces him to. he is actively against what's going on in his head. anders is objectively not. you can make arguments for justice being corrupted to various degrees, but it is decidedly not comparable to connor's situation.
He knows she's not one of the templars. Because she calls him a demon when he gets his glowy thing on, even after he saved her, he assumes she's "brainwashed" and lashes out in a rage.maxernst wrote...
But if they're in tandem all the time, why does Justice not understand that the mage is not one of the Templars?
maxernst wrote...
ademska wrote...
okay, but think about it this way: over the course of the six years hawke knows anders, until the chantry climax he only definitively loses control, like not subject to interpretation, once. twice, if you rival him in a romance following the Justice quest. that's one, possibly two instances in the entire six years hawke knows him.
every other instance of justice emerging (that is to say, anders turning kind of blue) is very subject to interpretation. you see it as justice taking control, but many other people on this board including myself consider that their dialogue lines are recorded in tandem. they speak in symbolic unison, and justice's goals are anders' goals.
connor, on the other hand, is possessed and cannot control his actions. he does not want to hurt his family or the staff, and the demon forces him to. he is actively against what's going on in his head. anders is objectively not. you can make arguments for justice being corrupted to various degrees, but it is decidedly not comparable to connor's situation.
But if they're in tandem all the time, why does Justice not understand that the mage is not one of the Templars? Since Anders admits to having more and more frequent memory blackouts, I think the most likely explanation is that he has no direct knowledge of what's going on in our world except when Anders eyes glow blue. By the end, I think he's inexorably sliding toward Connor's condition. He may be allowing the posession, but it's still posession. I think it's ironic that someone who fought so hard for freedom is surrendering control of his own body.
And as far as over six years, it only happens twice goes...well, it happens on the very first day my Hawke meets him. And frankly, finding out that somebody I've just met has this uncontrollable vengeful spirit that pops out sometimes doesn't inspire me to spend more time with him. So my Hawke has no idea how often it really happens. It's happened both times that he's seen him in the presence of the Templars. Yes, I realize nothing happens if you take him to the Gallows Courtyard or the Chantry, but that's metagaming knowledge--Iain wasn't about to take the risk.
Modifié par ademska, 14 juin 2011 - 04:10 .
SurelyForth wrote...
ejoslin wrote...
I took him asking to move in so completely differently than what is being discussed here. To me it seemed both manipulative and sleazy. IIRC (and it's been a few months since I played) it went something like,
"I love you. I've spent three years aching for you every night! Really sweetheart, I mean it! Ummm, btw baby, I'm having some issues with my place at the moment and I really can't stay there so I need another place to crash. Can I move in with you?" This is a sleazy guy move that more than one friend of mine has fallen for. And his reaction if you turn him down is totally in line with it being sleazy rather than loving.
And unfortunately, the women I know who have fallen for that really sounded kind of the same as Hawke did when talking about their new man :/
Except he only says that he's spent three years aching for Hawke after she says he can move in. Before he asks, he just says that he loves her and that she should have a normal life with someone else. Hardly laying it on thick.
Of course, I don't see any artifice in the build up of his relationship, nor do I think for a second that he's not legitimately in love with Hawke well before he makes a move. If you choose the sandwich line, it's clear he's a little uneasy asking because he realizes how it will come across, but he does it anyway (as if compelled by ****ty writing meant to cover several conversations in one!)
And, seriously, if he was just using Hawke he probably would have made a move sooner...certainly before Fenris and Isabela could stake their claims. He hardly makes the whole thing easy...how many times can you fling yourself at him before he gives in? And the fact that he waits until after you've seen him kill/almost kill Ella is, like I said before, a pretty clear indication that he wanted ALL the cards out on the table, even the horribly unflattering ones. It's like...the anti-manipulation at that point.
But, as I've said before, I get no whiff of manipulation from him at all until Act 3, and it's clear that he's so absolutely horrible at lying it makes me even more confident that he means everything he's said up until that point.
Modifié par ejoslin, 14 juin 2011 - 04:11 .
He does, but he's extremely obvious about it, in a way that makes me assume he really is being sincere in Act 2 and manipulation is not the principle item on the agenda. I mean, I'm sure he's aware shacking up with Hawke would be beneficial to him, and it's probably does contribute to the chastity belt coming off to some degree, but if it were the main reason or even a particularly big reason, I think he would act much differently than he does in that scene.ejoslin wrote...
Act 3 definitely has him trying to use Hawke's feeling to get him/her to do what he wants. He says "I love you," there as a way to manipulate, not to express his feelings.
Modifié par ipgd, 14 juin 2011 - 04:22 .
Modifié par cmessaz, 14 juin 2011 - 04:23 .
ademska wrote...
@CGG
well, not to apple polish, and i've not been lurking here THAT long all things considered, but your posts are some of the most insightful things i've ever read. you can't imagine my surprise when, after scouring the WASTELAND of discussion and fic boards that is this terrible, abysmal fandom, the place i expected to be one of the worst cesspits was actually full of both thoughtful and delightful debate
really, it's a whole bevy of batman people here.
what kinda fic are you generally into? i might have some recs, at the very least.
Modifié par Miri1984, 14 juin 2011 - 04:39 .
CulturalGeekGirl wrote...
all the awesome words
Modifié par ademska, 14 juin 2011 - 04:48 .
ipgd wrote...
Addai67 wrote...
It's very understandable he'd be hurt. I was expecting something like "you're probably right, you should stay away from me." The YOU BETRAYED ME was quite a shocker. I deliberately chose the line that said "I'm not ready" rather than "lol sucker, see you." And really there was no discussion of moving in prior to that, you only just slept together the
first time. Although granted, all Hawke's lines were pretty much "we'll be together forever and ever!"
I should just shut up now. [smilie]../../../images/forum/emoticons/cool.png[/smilie]
It's not that much of a shocker. I mean, he spent 3 years trying to not bang Hawke and telegraphs his clingy dependancy in a big way. Just imagine him as that 15 year old girl who loses her virginity to a guy who
doesn't call her back and that's Anders's emotional state after you refuse him there.
CulturalGeekGirl wrote...
I also agree that a guy asking to move in too early is less offputting for me personally than a guy not being willing to talk about a thing for three years.
If you won't talk about a thing for... a month, at that point I'm pretty much going to have decided that you're not interested anymore. If you come back to talk to me later, and I happen to be single at the time, then OK. That's fine, I'm forgiving.
ReiSilver wrote...
Does anyone else wish they could invite Anders to use the Hawke estate basement when they're not romancing him?
Modifié par Sarielle, 14 juin 2011 - 04:49 .