I was having a thought earlier today that ties in with this whole Alistair/Anders thing.
If you're a non-Cousland Warden who is romancing Alistair, and you either make him King or refuse to kill Loghain (in order to have him die on the Archdemon, naturally), you're pretty much doing what Anders does at the end of DA2, minus the unfortunate lying bit. You're deciding that some ideal (namely having a good and compassionate ruler) is more important than love. Sure I know Anora is a decent ruler, but if s*** is going down on the scale we're looking at, Alistair is going to be better for everyone who isn't rich and powerful. Anora has little interest in helping anyone who doesn't directly benefit her.
My Mahariel did the "becoming the consort" thing, but I feel like long distances and absences (especially with the expansions) would cause them to drift apart. (Also, if Anders had been romanceable in Awakenings, she would have climbed that like a tree.)
My Amell let Loghain live and kill the Archdemon, just in case the DR turned out to be a "bad plan." She felt that having everyone she cared about alive and no old gods around would be better than any of the alternatives.
In cases where Alistair is the one who breaks off the romance, he's also doing something similar to Anders: sacrificing love for duty.
It just made me realize that a lot of female Wardens have direct experience with the "sacrifice romantic ideals for the greater good," thing, while most Hawkes don't; the dialogue options don't even really give you the ability to be that kind of person. I think that's why I've become somewhat fascinated with Anders and the Warden. I may also have to make a Mage revolutionary Hawke for Anders now; previously my mage was the only one loyal to Fenris.
The big sticking point here is the lie about the potion. Though that doens't seem to be what people are most likely to consider the most unforgiveable or odious part of what happens in act 3, it's the one thing that annoys me. Not that Anders should have told the truth, I understand why he didn't. Rather, he should have given Hawke the chance not to ask any questions, simply stating "I need these ingredients for a project, I'm not entirely sure that it will work, so I'd rather not tell you what it is yet." That way, a mage-sympathetic Hawke can help him without having to endure the false hope of the lie. I understand why they had him lie as the default, and he was probably half trying to get Hawke to hate him, in order to distance himself. It still gets me a little bit, but most of my Hawkes are much less broken up about the whole lie thing than the average player seems to be... perhaps because I had it spoiled for me beforehand. Also, possibly because my Anders-rivalmancing rogue Hawke is also a pathological liar.
And yes, once you're past that, there's still the question of the bomb itself, I suppose. I just can't get that worked up about it in the context of a world like Thedas, especially when I have the perspective of an elf. Lots of people die in a war, more die in a blight, and hundreds of thousands have died at the Chantry's hands. The numbers involved here seem so small; tragic, but I'm not keeling over about it.
Modifié par CulturalGeekGirl, 20 juin 2011 - 08:40 .