Ryzaki wrote...
Then that's your point. Not that Anders breaks up with Hawke *just* for listening to a demon. Otherwise Anders should have a "no relationship" point in Act 1. Where you can listen to a demon. Or even during Seb's quest where again Hawke can have a conversation with a demon.
And again Hawke can deal with a demon before that with no consequences. It's about dealing with *that* demon and the circumstances of the deal that lead to the breakup. (Unless dealing with act 1 demon means one can't romance Anders.)
excuse me while i slam my face into a door or a pot of coffee. i'm not sure which would be more productive for arguing this. or, rather,
not arguing this since it
doesn't ****ing matter.
I'm inclined to believe killing Anders and involving someone innocet (Feyrniel) in said deal had far more to do with him breaking up with Hawke than just Hawke talking to a demon. I don't see Anders as detesting Merrill as much as he thinks she's foolishly following the advice of something that she can't control. I see more expasperation and irritation in his dealing with Merrill than hate. Similar to a templar Hawke I are inclined to believe that as long as Hawke doesn't harm anyone other than him/her self Anders will try to get him/her to see the light.
Now Justice might go off the wall just becase Hawke's talking to a demon but I'm inclined to believe Anders is reasonable enough to realize that demons can give useful information if one isn't naive enough to fall for their tricks. And positive enough to try to get Hawke to stop dealing with demons anyway he can.
He flips his lid with Feynriel because it's a horrible act to him.
i never said anders would detest a blood mage hawke, in fact i think upthread i said it wouldn't diminish his feelings at all. only that he would find himself unable to enter into a relationship at all. if anders breaks it off after night terrors, he still expresses jealousy toward other love interests and overall trust in hawke, so clearly his feelings aren't diminished.
as to the rest, i can't have a productive discussion with you because i view justice and anders as
janders, a colloid being (thx ippy), thus i interpret janders' motivations completely differently than you do. our views are too diametrically opposed to have a discussion make any kind of rational sense without a billion caveats, unfortunately.
...Okay? Not sure what this has to do with what I'm saying.
you said you believed being a blood mage didn't preclude the possibility of a rivalmance. i disagree, and elaborated politely on why i think so. it was sort of, you know, my whole argument.
Modifié par ademska, 07 juillet 2011 - 11:32 .
Lol!
Anders seems to affect major events of the games even when he isn't trying! Lol!
Retour en haut
That's like sayin someone's allergic to cheese because they couldn't eat cheesecake and saying them eating a cheeseburger with no problems is irrevalant. 
LOL 
