it's not as dichotomous as all that. ipgd has explained in general terms that 'justice' is a scapegoat for bad actions and 'anders' is the personality to which janders likes to align himself, but people (even merged beings) are more complex than that.KnightofPhoenix wrote...
Ah I see, I never read that. Thanks!
The theory makes sense, but there is still the issue of Anders succumbing to his Justice aspect on rivalry. If he pretty much "designed" it to be wrong, then how would he sucumb to it if it has no power on its own and he still thinks it's wrong? Is it because of depression that is pressuing him to succumb to his other aspect? In essence, what makes his Justice aspect stronger than his Anders aspect?
And sorry for not paying closer attention to your posts vis-a-vis this subject before, and I appreciate you taking the time to explain.
janders speaks regularly of how 'his' (anders') anger and rage corrupted justice, which is a less black and white dispersement of blame. as hawke influences janders' opinion of himself on friend vs rivalry, the way he perceives the differences between 'anders' and 'justice' are bound to change accordingly. on the rival path, he views 'justice' as a force to fight against, an embodiment of everything 'anders' must avoid becoming, while on the friend path he more likely just doesn't differentiate between the two, and if he does, then he doesn't view 'justice' as wholly terrible.





Retour en haut






