CulturalGeekGirl wrote...
The problem is that I've seen the Karl thing used as a sexuality kudgel on poor girls who say "I think of Anders in my personal playthrough as straight, even though I'm cool with the idea of him being gay or bisexual as well." I'm of the opinion that it's perfectly valid for them to think that, and it's perfectly possible that Anders considers himself straight if he is romancing a female Hawke. If Karl was his first but after that he's dated primarily women, it's not unreasonable for him to consider himself straight at this point.
If they deny Karl's existence, then they're wrong. But if they look at Karl and say "sure that happened, but if on a playthrough with F!Hawke Anders doesn't see fit to mention it, it may be because he doesn't consider it as vital a part of his sexuality when he's interested in a F!Hawke, and I should be free to interpret it that way." I know a lot of people whose perception of their sexuality alters greatly based on whomever they're attracted to at the time. If you want to say that he tells your F!Hawke about it off-camera then great, but other girls should be free to interpret it the other way, if they'd like.
A lot of the time that's what they want to say, they just can't vocalize it, because they're not me. They just want to say that Anders has presented himself as straight to them in their headcanon and I don't see why that's incorrect. In fact, it's explicitly stated as not being incorrect by Gaider. So I have to be the "flexible sexuality's advocate."
all of this is all well and good, but i spent an entire day in a thread arguing with 5-6 other people that karl does, in fact,
actually exist in playthroughs where he's not mentioned. or, well, that his relationship with anders existed.
i get that you want to give these people the benefit of the doubt, but it seems like you're positing that most of the people against whom i would use gaider's statement understand the concept of sexual identity... instead of, you know, just wanting to wash the gay off him or argue some bull**** about "subjective sexuality".
and given that, when i extended that subjective sexuality argument to include feynriel not existing at all when his quest isn't done, one of the buttheads i was arguing with actually AGREED??
then i think you're giving them
far too much credit.
edit: my words are incomprehensible because my friends are screaming at an n64 so
tl;dr: people are idiots who actually argue that because they didn't see it, it didn't happen.
Modifié par ademska, 10 juillet 2011 - 03:39 .