I find it funny that, as someone who loves Fenders and... Anderstair? I'm arguing in favor of not always assuming Anders is completely bisexual. But here I am.
The thing is, I have frequently seen people who DO have the reasonable middle-ground opinions in the bisexuality arguments... probably because I'm
actively looking for them. I've seen dozens of girls (and yes, it seems like it's usually girls) who are trying to be open-minded while also trying to codify their own opinions get positively
flayed alive there.
I've also never had a girl who I pegged as open-minded reject my "Ok, so do you see him as primarily interested in women despite Karl? Basically, rounds up to straight?" suggestion. It's a nice compromise and everybody keeps their
skin. The problem is I've never seen it brought up except by me... it's always "If you do not admit he is bisexual you are an ignorant homophobe!" When I'm in the bisexuality threads (which I probably ever won't be again, for exactly this reason) the people on both extreme sides often attack mercilessly anyone who doesn't agree with them 100%, without bothering to err on the side of interpreting posts by new posters generously. It's what I call the "angry letters from both sides" phenomenon, and it almost got me to quit the Bioware boards a while ago.
The problem is that by haranguing the girls who are fine with the idea of bisexuality but think of their own Anders as straight, you're pushing the people who are
most likely to develop nuanced views out of the debate. I've found it's very easy to educate them about flexible sexualities, and have them accept that explanation. A compromise where they acknowledge Karl but can still reconcile it with the perception of Anders' sexuality they developed in Awakening is the ideal solution, for me. And who knows, maybe three years from now they'll be more comfortable with the idea in general.
If you go up to a girl who prefers to think of her own Anders as straight, and pat her gently on the shoulder and say "Sure, he can have slept with Karl and still identify as straight" you may have helped her take her first baby step toward having a nuanced view on sexuality. I've never seen the "your interpretation is a stupid stretch that obviously belies your underlying homophobia" approach
help anyone at all.
ademska wrote...
i basically feel like gaider's statement:
and also because a player who prefers to think of Anders as straight is welcome to do so
is followed with a silent, "but they'd be wrong," or at the very least, "but this is a willful interpretation and bid at ignorance for the sake of roleplay". feel free to correct me, mr. gaider.
perhaps it makes me pigheaded, and i'm not condoning jumping down the throat of that one girl you mentioned, but i have great difficulty seeing any real reason for diminishing the impact of anders' sexuality statement that isn't threaded in unfortunate implications. your posited explanation of anders forgoing sex with men after his escape, and then, if hawke is female, simply not falling back into that view of sexuality is totally fine on its own, but anyone who wants to rationalize anders as straight in the first place is incredibly suspect.
what real reason can you have for that, honestly? you can't just will away aspects of a character because you don't like them or find them inconsistent, and either of those reasons is... well, just awful
I don't see that implied "but they'd be wrong" coda to Gaider's statement. I'm very uncomfortable saying "but this is what he obviously meant." I think he meant exactly what he said, no more, no less. I think his words were probably chosen very carefully, so as NOT to explicitly state that people who think of Anders as straight are wrong.
As for why someone might prefer not to think of someone as bisexual, but rather "straight with an exception" or "rounds up to straight," well, scientifically-speaking, bisexuality is a complicated and controversial topic. Let's just say there's a lot of interesting research on it that I am not going to discuss with a ten foot lecturn. At this point I've just decided to handwave and say "sexuality may work differently on a fundamental level in Thedas," to avoid having to discuss the most recent psychological research on bisexuality. Let's just say this: it is very complicated and nobody agrees how it really works, at least in men. (Female bisexuality is slightly more well understood, strangely enough.)
The concept of bisexuality as a set, established,
unchangeable sexual identity is one that makes me shrug, and I find it frustrating that it's become a catch-all into which anyone who does not have an utterly black or white sexuality is forced. I've also known far more "rounds up to _____" or "____, with an exception" people than I've known people who strongly identify as bisexual. Most of the bisexuals I know personally have associated themselves with some other sexuality at some point in their life. There's some research that may support this, indicating that many people who classify themselves as bisexual considered themselves gay or straight at another point in their life.
I don't think that Kaidan falling for Shepard necessarily makes him strictly bi, either. I use this argument to counter those who believe that making existing LIs bi in ME is a crazy bad thing. When people argue that liking one member of the same sex makes you gay, I'll explain that having characters be Shepardsexual could mean they were always bi, or it could simply put them in the "____, with an exception" category, which is actually the form of queer sexuality I've encountered most frequently in the real world. In fact, it's acknowledged to the point that it's become a cultural memetic joke.... most dudes have that "one dude I'd sleep with" exception for David Bowie, or George Clooney, or Johnny Depp, or whoever. Why can't Kaidan have it for Shep? Garrus already has his "not Xenosexual, but with an exception" sexuality for Femshep, after all.
Attributing "awful" motivations to everyone with a certain opinion will only divide the lines and diminish understanding. I find the most useful way to have a debate is to assume the LEAST awful possible motivation for whatever the person believes, and leave it up to them to contradict that assumption. Now if someone comes in asking for a "no gay" button, you can definitely assume they're not going to be open-minded. But if it's just some girl who is probably fairly young (and possibly not very educated about the sexual spectrum), who prefers to think of a character in a certain way, being a little generous will help the cause of tolerance in the long run, I think.
Modifié par CulturalGeekGirl, 10 juillet 2011 - 09:33 .