EDIT: Top? Whatever, because I'm a terrible person... TERRORISM!
Modifié par YamiSnuffles, 12 juillet 2011 - 08:18 .
Modifié par YamiSnuffles, 12 juillet 2011 - 08:18 .
Modifié par CulturalGeekGirl, 12 juillet 2011 - 08:19 .
Guest_Queen-Of-Stuff_*
Upsettingshorts wrote...
The point I'm trying to make is this:
Terrorism is a tactic. It is a method of asymmetric warfare utilized to bring about political change that has no regard for, or deliberately targets noncombatants. Anders utilized this tactic in support of - depending on your position - a sympathetic cause. Why is that important? Because it shows how Anders and Justice have changed due to prolonged contact with each other, it demonstrates how far the struggle between mages and the Templars has escalated, it raises the stakes of the conflict to such a height that Hawke must choose between supporting the police state or terrorism - both reprehensible outcomes that highlight the tragedy of the conflict, and overall deeply effect the severity of the implications of the narrative.
To then say that what Anders did wasn't terrorism chucks all that in the waste bin, and for what purpose? So we can feel better about supporting him? Why should we? If his cause is ultimately just, than the ends justify the means - and we ought make no apologies - including denials - for what he had to do to see it through.
CulturalGeekGirl wrote...
Read any of the linguistic scholarship on the term and the consensus is that it's no more than a political cudgel that can realistically be applied to any violence a person does not approve of, if you use broader definitions.
Modifié par Upsettingshorts, 12 juillet 2011 - 08:27 .
beckaliz wrote...
@KoP: It depends on how much butter. And if it's real butter or movie theater butter. Movie theater butter is nauseating.But real butter is yummy.
CulturalGeekGirl wrote...
Well since nobody is contributing anything to the sexuality discussion, I'll explain why I'm so tired of the other one.
yukidama wrote...
I don't understand the link between not liking Fenris and not liking dominant women. Sometimes I wonder if you're just saying things to drum up conflict where there is none.
Guest_Queen-Of-Stuff_*
Upsettingshorts wrote...
beckaliz wrote...
@KoP: It depends on how much butter. And if it's real butter or movie theater butter. Movie theater butter is nauseating.But real butter is yummy.
That's because movie theater butter isn't butter. It's hydrogenated soybean oil.
/worked at a movie theater
Patriciachr34 wrote...
yukidama wrote...
I don't understand the link between not liking Fenris and not liking dominant women. Sometimes I wonder if you're just saying things to drum up conflict where there is none.
Just to give me a frame of reference for your comment, what do you consider a dominant woman? Is it tha a woman who fills a predominatly male role; or a woman who controls a relationship?
Modifié par yukidama, 12 juillet 2011 - 08:32 .
The woman who put in the ball gag and is now crushing my genitals with her heels, of course.Patriciachr34 wrote...
Just to give me a frame of reference for your comment, what do you consider a dominant woman? Is it tha a woman who fills a predominatly male role; or a woman who controls a relationship?
Guest_Queen-Of-Stuff_*
beckaliz wrote...
Upsettingshorts wrote...
beckaliz wrote...
@KoP: It depends on how much butter. And if it's real butter or movie theater butter. Movie theater butter is nauseating.But real butter is yummy.
That's because movie theater butter isn't butter. It's hydrogenated soybean oil.
/worked at a movie theater
Eew. ;_;
yukidama wrote...
I don't understand the link between not liking Fenris and not liking dominant women. Sometimes I wonder if you're just saying things to drum up conflict where there is none.
Modifié par CulturalGeekGirl, 12 juillet 2011 - 08:41 .
LOL! You're scary sometimes.ipgd wrote...
The woman who put in the ball gag and is now crushing my genitals with her heels, of course.Patriciachr34 wrote...
Just to give me a frame of reference for your comment, what do you consider a dominant woman? Is it tha a woman who fills a predominatly male role; or a woman who controls a relationship?
yukidama wrote...
Patriciachr34 wrote...
yukidama wrote...
I don't understand the link between not liking Fenris and not liking dominant women. Sometimes I wonder if you're just saying things to drum up conflict where there is none.
Just to give me a frame of reference for your comment, what do you consider a dominant woman? Is it tha a woman who fills a predominatly male role; or a woman who controls a relationship?
I'm not the one arguing about dominant women, you'd better ask CGG what she means instead. I guess she's applying the terms using dom/sub from BDSM subculture?
that's the same **** they put in half&half, isn't it?Upsettingshorts wrote...
That's because movie theater butter isn't butter. It's hydrogenated soybean oil.
/worked at a movie theater
ademska wrote...
that's the same **** they put in half&half, isn't it?Upsettingshorts wrote...
That's because movie theater butter isn't butter. It's hydrogenated soybean oil.
half cream half nasty crap
Modifié par Upsettingshorts, 12 juillet 2011 - 08:45 .
Modifié par beckaliz, 12 juillet 2011 - 08:45 .
ademska wrote...
that's the same **** they put in half&half, isn't it?Upsettingshorts wrote...
That's because movie theater butter isn't butter. It's hydrogenated soybean oil.
/worked at a movie theater
half cream half nasty crap