You would spend like a bajillion hours doing some argumentative/logical essay and then turn it in. Then he we would be like alright.. next assignment is to take that argument and argue AGAINST it. I was all *facepalm* but it taught a great lesson about argumentation and discussion. That being that internalizing arguments, personalizing points, and closing your eyes to the other side of things is a mistake.
off topic rant over---
So basically what we are saying is that Hawke is "stuck" waiting to react to something. Not technically "doing" something, but knowing that a catastrophic event is inevitable and now he/she must react, but before the event Hawke is well.. helpless to do anything worth substance. Still, my theory stands that Hawke is no more than a windswept pawn in all this. Sure she/he can REACT now, but there was apparently no way to prevent it, to act sooner, to even have a plan in motion for "doing" something. By doing something I figured that meant Hawke had some grand scheme or plan of action to implement to make things better or easier or just.. go down less badly. If doing something is just reacting, well even a Hawke who was as passive as a doormat would now be forced to react to the situation.
Things spiraling out of control and you are just a spectator waiting for a chance to react to... something (which your not exactly sure of until end game.) I just think it is a failure on Hawke's part to control the situation. Mostly because you aren't allowed to. Trying to kick Meredith out of power ends badly, Trying to disuade Anders ends badly, doing nothing and not picking sides still ends badly, choosing sides and still ends badly. I'm reminded of an old hard determinism theory about choice... "choo choo my fate is laid out for me, and so when the time comes when I'm presented a choice I simply react or remain passive."
These are so not personal btw, just theories.
DOH! edit for T.O.P.

by pikkatze on DA
Modifié par Arquen, 13 juillet 2011 - 02:51 .





Retour en haut





